AB 772 — Workers' compensation: domestic terrorism.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes a system of workers' compensation in which an employer is required to provide medical treatment and compensation, among other benefits, in the event an employee is injured as a result of their employment. Existing law prescribes the ways in which an employer, except the State, is require to secure compensation for their injured employees. This bill would clarify that an employer is not limited in its ability to insure against an act of domestic terrorism or to provide benefits in excess of those required by existing law following an act of terrorism. Existing law requires the employer to provide medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment that is reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. Existing law requires every employer to establish a utilization review process, and defines "utilization review" as utilization review or utilization management functions that prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review and approve, modify, delay, or deny, based in whole or in part on medical necessity to cure and relieve, treatment recommendations by physicians, prior to, retrospectively, or concurrent with providing medical treatment services. This bill would clarify that when an employer approves a request for medical treatment from a treatment provider, without modification, the employer has completed utilization review under the law. Existing law establishes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, which has jurisdiction to adjudicate claims relating to workers' compensation. Existing law creates the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, who has specified powers and duties relating to the workers' compensation trial process. Existing law requires the administrative director to establish a priority calendar for specified issues requiring an expedited hearing, such as entitlement to medical treatment, a medical treatment appointment or medical-legal examination, or entitlement to temporary disability indemnity payments. This bill would require that if a claim for injury resulting from a domestic terror attack is set for expedited hearing on the priority calendar, that claim be heard before any others. Existing law requires that a claim for workers' compensation be made within a year of the date of injury, the payment of indemnity, or the provision of medical treatment, whichever is later. This bill would exempt from that provision claims alleging injury from the December 2, 2015, attack on the Inland Regional Center in the City of San Bernardino, and instead allow claims based on that attack to be filed until January 1, 2025.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/25/21 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 25, 2021
- Introduced 02/16/21 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2021
- AB772 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- James C. Ramos · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ramos, James C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alanis, Juan | Republican | Yea |
| Sanchez, Kate | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 772 do?
- Existing law establishes a system of workers' compensation in which an employer is required to provide medical treatment and compensation, among other benefits, in the event an employee is injured as a result of their employment. Existing law prescribes the ways in which an employer, except the State, is require to secure compensation for their injured employees. This bill would clarify that an employer is not limited in its ability to insure against an act of domestic terrorism or to provide benefits in excess of those required by existing law following an act of terrorism. Existing law requires the employer to provide medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment that is reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. Existing law requires every employer to establish a utilization review process, and defines "utilization review" as utilization review or utilization management functions that prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review and approve, modify, delay, or deny, based in whole or in part on medical necessity to cure and relieve, treatment recommendations by physicians, prior to, retrospectively, or concurrent with providing medical treatment services. This bill would clarify that when an employer approves a request for medical treatment from a treatment provider, without modification, the employer has completed utilization review under the law. Existing law establishes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, which has jurisdiction to adjudicate claims relating to workers' compensation. Existing law creates the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, who has specified powers and duties relating to the workers' compensation trial process. Existing law requires the administrative director to establish a priority calendar for specified issues requiring an expedited hearing, such as entitlement to medical treatment, a medical treatment appointment or medical-legal examination, or entitlement to temporary disability indemnity payments. This bill would require that if a claim for injury resulting from a domestic terror attack is set for expedited hearing on the priority calendar, that claim be heard before any others. Existing law requires that a claim for workers' compensation be made within a year of the date of injury, the payment of indemnity, or the provision of medical treatment, whichever is later. This bill would exempt from that provision claims alleging injury from the December 2, 2015, attack on the Inland Regional Center in the City of San Bernardino, and instead allow claims based on that attack to be filed until January 1, 2025.
- Who sponsors AB 772?
- AB 772 is sponsored by Ramos, James C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 772?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 772?
- Track AB 772 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 772
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 772
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →