California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 1089 — Credit services organizations.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Credit Services Act of 1984, defines and regulates the activities of credit services organizations. Existing law generally defines a credit services organization as a person who, for payment, performs specified credit-related services, such as improving a buyer's credit record and obtaining loans. Existing law requires credit services organizations to obtain a surety bond, as specified, before conducting business and requires that they register with the Department of Justice, subject to a fee of $100. Existing law requires that credit services be provided pursuant to a written contract, which is required to contain specified provisions, and requires the credit services organization to provide a prescribed information statement before the execution of the contract. Existing law requires the contract to contain a notice informing the buyer that the contract can be canceled within 5 days from the date the contract is signed. Existing law prohibits, among other things, a credit services organization from receiving money before full and complete performance of the service the organization has agreed to perform and prohibits failing to perform the agreed-upon services within 6 months. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes a buyer of services who is injured by a credit services organization's violation of the act, or its breach of contract, to bring an action for damages or injunctive relief, as specified. Existing law also authorizes any person, including a consumer credit reporting agency, to bring an action, as specified, for a violation of these provisions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions to, instead, require the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, commencing on January 1, 2023, to license, regulate, and oversee credit services organizations. The bill would, beginning on January 1, 2022, require the department to take all action necessary in order to be prepared to perform these duties commencing January 1, 2023, including, but not limited to, the adoption of necessary regulations. The bill would prohibit the public disclosure of specific information provided by a licensee to the department. This bill would prohibit a person from engaging in credit services in this state without a license and would also require the person to comply with specified requirements, and the reporting, examination, and other oversight requirements issued or mandated by the department. The bill would require a person applying for a license to, among other things, pay an application fee, sign the application under penalty of perjury, and submit to a criminal background check by the department. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require each licensee to, among other things, file reports with the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation under oath, maintain a surety bond, and pay to the department its pro rata share of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred in the administration of these provisions, as estimated by the department. The bill would authorize the department to enforce these provisions by, among other things, adopting regulations, performing investigations, suspending or revoking a license, issuing orders and claims for relief, and enforcing the provisions, as specified. The bill would revise information that must be provided to a consumer before a credit service contract is executed, including a notice regarding the filing of complaints with the department and would require the Attorney General and the department to maintain an internet website for this purpose. This bill would replace the term "buyer" with the term "consumer" for purposes of describing a person utilizing the services of a credit services organization and would prescribe other definitions in this regard. The bill would require a credit services organization to provide a consumer a monthly statement showing each service performed for a consumer, as specified, and would require the organization to perform services agreed upon within 180 days of contracting for those services. The bill would require the information statement and contract to inform the consumer that the contract can be canceled before midnight on the 5th working day after execution of the document it. This bill would extend prohibitions on counseling a consumer to make untrue statements to other specified parties. Among other things, the bill would prohibit a credit services organization from submitting a dispute to a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer more than 180 days after the disputed account has been removed, or from failing to provide along with its first written communication to a credit reporting agency or data furnisher sufficient information to investigate a dispute of an account. The bill would require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit services organization to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. This bill would require a credit services organization to redact specified information in certain written communications. The bill would require a credit services organization to maintain certain information on file for 4 years. The bill would require the department to maintain an internet website, as specified. The bill would prescribe statutory penalties that may be imposed on a credit services organization that willfully and knowingly violates these provisions. Because the bill would change the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the department to periodically increase the amount of the fee it is authorized to charge for licensure, regulation, and oversight of licensees, but the amount of the fee would be prohibited from exceeding that which is reasonable and necessary to satisfy the department's costs in complying with its duties to license, regulate, and oversee licensees. The bill would create the Credit Repair Services Licensing Fund, the monies in which shall be available to the department upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit service organization, and that also has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain the credit services organization's name and address, to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 22).

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  9. Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and P. & C.P.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  11. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 32 Yea · 6 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 20101
Republican 1501
Total 32602
% of votes cast 80%15%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Not Voting
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Not Voting
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2000
Democratic 8000
Republican 0100
Total 10100
% of votes cast 91%9%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Min — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 64 Yea · 8 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 47000
Unaffiliated 15302
Republican 2506
Total 64808
% of votes cast 80%10%0%10%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Essayli — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Not Voting
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 9001
Unaffiliated 2100
Republican 0102
Total 11203
% of votes cast 69%13%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Not Voting
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Not Voting
Sanchez, Kate Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7000
Unaffiliated 1001
Republican 0002
Total 8003
% of votes cast 73%0%0%27%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Maienschein — Yea
Essayli — Not Voting
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Not Voting
Sanchez, Kate Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2000
Democratic 4000
Republican 1100
Total 7100
% of votes cast 88%13%0%0%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Santiago — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6001
Unaffiliated 2100
Republican 0001
Total 8102
% of votes cast 73%9%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Chau — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6001
Unaffiliated 3000
Republican 1001
Total 10002
% of votes cast 83%0%0%17%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Burke — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1089 do?
Existing law, the Credit Services Act of 1984, defines and regulates the activities of credit services organizations. Existing law generally defines a credit services organization as a person who, for payment, performs specified credit-related services, such as improving a buyer's credit record and obtaining loans. Existing law requires credit services organizations to obtain a surety bond, as specified, before conducting business and requires that they register with the Department of Justice, subject to a fee of $100. Existing law requires that credit services be provided pursuant to a written contract, which is required to contain specified provisions, and requires the credit services organization to provide a prescribed information statement before the execution of the contract. Existing law requires the contract to contain a notice informing the buyer that the contract can be canceled within 5 days from the date the contract is signed. Existing law prohibits, among other things, a credit services organization from receiving money before full and complete performance of the service the organization has agreed to perform and prohibits failing to perform the agreed-upon services within 6 months. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes a buyer of services who is injured by a credit services organization's violation of the act, or its breach of contract, to bring an action for damages or injunctive relief, as specified. Existing law also authorizes any person, including a consumer credit reporting agency, to bring an action, as specified, for a violation of these provisions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions to, instead, require the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, commencing on January 1, 2023, to license, regulate, and oversee credit services organizations. The bill would, beginning on January 1, 2022, require the department to take all action necessary in order to be prepared to perform these duties commencing January 1, 2023, including, but not limited to, the adoption of necessary regulations. The bill would prohibit the public disclosure of specific information provided by a licensee to the department. This bill would prohibit a person from engaging in credit services in this state without a license and would also require the person to comply with specified requirements, and the reporting, examination, and other oversight requirements issued or mandated by the department. The bill would require a person applying for a license to, among other things, pay an application fee, sign the application under penalty of perjury, and submit to a criminal background check by the department. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require each licensee to, among other things, file reports with the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation under oath, maintain a surety bond, and pay to the department its pro rata share of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred in the administration of these provisions, as estimated by the department. The bill would authorize the department to enforce these provisions by, among other things, adopting regulations, performing investigations, suspending or revoking a license, issuing orders and claims for relief, and enforcing the provisions, as specified. The bill would revise information that must be provided to a consumer before a credit service contract is executed, including a notice regarding the filing of complaints with the department and would require the Attorney General and the department to maintain an internet website for this purpose. This bill would replace the term "buyer" with the term "consumer" for purposes of describing a person utilizing the services of a credit services organization and would prescribe other definitions in this regard. The bill would require a credit services organization to provide a consumer a monthly statement showing each service performed for a consumer, as specified, and would require the organization to perform services agreed upon within 180 days of contracting for those services. The bill would require the information statement and contract to inform the consumer that the contract can be canceled before midnight on the 5th working day after execution of the document it. This bill would extend prohibitions on counseling a consumer to make untrue statements to other specified parties. Among other things, the bill would prohibit a credit services organization from submitting a dispute to a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer more than 180 days after the disputed account has been removed, or from failing to provide along with its first written communication to a credit reporting agency or data furnisher sufficient information to investigate a dispute of an account. The bill would require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit services organization to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. This bill would require a credit services organization to redact specified information in certain written communications. The bill would require a credit services organization to maintain certain information on file for 4 years. The bill would require the department to maintain an internet website, as specified. The bill would prescribe statutory penalties that may be imposed on a credit services organization that willfully and knowingly violates these provisions. Because the bill would change the definition of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the department to periodically increase the amount of the fee it is authorized to charge for licensure, regulation, and oversight of licensees, but the amount of the fee would be prohibited from exceeding that which is reasonable and necessary to satisfy the department's costs in complying with its duties to license, regulate, and oversee licensees. The bill would create the Credit Repair Services Licensing Fund, the monies in which shall be available to the department upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit service organization, and that also has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain the credit services organization's name and address, to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1089?
AB 1089 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 1089?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1089?
Track AB 1089 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1089

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1089

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →