California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 192 — Better for Families Tax Refund.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 51, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes various forms of relief for low-income Californians, including certain tax benefits and public assistance programs. This bill would authorize the Controller to make a one-time Better for Families Tax Refund payment to each qualified recipient, as defined, of an applicable amount, as specified, in a form and manner determined by the Franchise Tax Board, in order to provide relief to Californians. This bill would create the Better for Families Tax Refund Fund, a new fund in the State Treasury, for the purposes of making the above-described payment, and would continuously appropriate that fund. This bill would, except as provided, make Better for Families Tax Refund payments, as specified, automatically exempt from a garnishment order, as defined, and would require a financial institution to employ a certain procedure to identify a deposit exempt pursuant to that provision. The bill would prohibit a financial institution that attempts to comply with those provisions in good faith from being subject to liability, as specified. (2) Existing law requires the Controller to state an account with persons that receive funds or property belonging to the state and fail to properly render account thereof to the state, and persons that fail to pay to the State Treasury any money belonging to the state. Existing law requires the Controller to offset delinquent accounts against personal income tax refunds. This bill would, before January 1, 2027, prohibit the Controller from offsetting delinquent accounts with the one-time payments authorized by this bill. (3) Existing law authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to issue an order to specified financial institutions, persons, and entities, including an officer or department of the state, to withhold and remit liquid assets of a delinquent taxpayer in order to satisfy the tax obligations of that taxpayer. This bill would, before January 1, 2027, prohibit the board from issuing an order to withhold and remit any amounts from the one-time payments authorized by this bill for liabilities owed by the eligible recipient pursuant to specified provisions. (4) The Personal Income Tax Law imposes a tax on individual taxpayers measured by the taxpayer's taxable income for the taxable year, but, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, allows various exclusions from gross income. This bill would exclude Better for Families Tax Refund payments authorized by this bill from the gross income of recipients for personal income tax purposes. (5) Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure, as defined to include exclusions from income, to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax credit will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. The bill would provide findings to comply with the additional information requirement for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (6) Existing law limits the collection and use of taxpayer information and provides that any unauthorized use of this information is punishable as a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2025, the Franchise Tax Board to provide tax returns or return information necessary for the Controller to make specified payments, and makes the information received by the Controller subject to limitation on the collection and use of that information. This bill would extend the above authorization to January 1, 2027, and provide, until January 1, 2027, the board the same authorization to disclose return or return information to the Controller to make payments to qualified recipients pursuant to the bill and to any third-party vendor with an existing contract for services relating to the distribution of payments to qualified recipients to provide services relating to the distribution of those payments. The bill would make the information provided to the Controller and a third-party vendor subject to the limitation on the collection and use of that information. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) The California Constitution generally prohibits the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and each local government from exceeding the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior fiscal year, adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population, and prescribes procedures for making adjustments to the appropriations limit. The California Constitution excludes certain specified appropriations as exempt from this total annual limit, including tax refunds. This bill would provide that the appropriations made by the bill are appropriations for purposes of refunding state tax liability incurred by Californians during the 2021–22 fiscal year, are not subject to the annual appropriations limit set by the California Constitution. The bill would make related findings and declarations. (8) This bill would make findings and declarations related to a gift of public funds. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 51, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  6. Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4526.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 27).

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  14. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 18. Page 507.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Withdrawn from committee.

  20. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 432.)

  21. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  24. Read first time.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  26. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 74 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32000
Unaffiliated 34005
Republican 8001
Total 74006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Smith — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Not Voting
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20003
Democratic 12001
Republican 4000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Newman — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Min — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Glazer — Not Voting
Borgeas — Not Voting
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Not Voting
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7003
Democratic 5001
Republican 2001
Total 14005
% of votes cast 74%0%0%26%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Skinner — Yea
Min — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Newman — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Roth — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Pan — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 18 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25200
Unaffiliated 31704
Republican 0901
Total 561805
% of votes cast 71%23%0%6%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Smith — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Kamlager — Not Voting
Quirk — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 192 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes various forms of relief for low-income Californians, including certain tax benefits and public assistance programs. This bill would authorize the Controller to make a one-time Better for Families Tax Refund payment to each qualified recipient, as defined, of an applicable amount, as specified, in a form and manner determined by the Franchise Tax Board, in order to provide relief to Californians. This bill would create the Better for Families Tax Refund Fund, a new fund in the State Treasury, for the purposes of making the above-described payment, and would continuously appropriate that fund. This bill would, except as provided, make Better for Families Tax Refund payments, as specified, automatically exempt from a garnishment order, as defined, and would require a financial institution to employ a certain procedure to identify a deposit exempt pursuant to that provision. The bill would prohibit a financial institution that attempts to comply with those provisions in good faith from being subject to liability, as specified. (2) Existing law requires the Controller to state an account with persons that receive funds or property belonging to the state and fail to properly render account thereof to the state, and persons that fail to pay to the State Treasury any money belonging to the state. Existing law requires the Controller to offset delinquent accounts against personal income tax refunds. This bill would, before January 1, 2027, prohibit the Controller from offsetting delinquent accounts with the one-time payments authorized by this bill. (3) Existing law authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to issue an order to specified financial institutions, persons, and entities, including an officer or department of the state, to withhold and remit liquid assets of a delinquent taxpayer in order to satisfy the tax obligations of that taxpayer. This bill would, before January 1, 2027, prohibit the board from issuing an order to withhold and remit any amounts from the one-time payments authorized by this bill for liabilities owed by the eligible recipient pursuant to specified provisions. (4) The Personal Income Tax Law imposes a tax on individual taxpayers measured by the taxpayer's taxable income for the taxable year, but, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, allows various exclusions from gross income. This bill would exclude Better for Families Tax Refund payments authorized by this bill from the gross income of recipients for personal income tax purposes. (5) Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure, as defined to include exclusions from income, to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax credit will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. The bill would provide findings to comply with the additional information requirement for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (6) Existing law limits the collection and use of taxpayer information and provides that any unauthorized use of this information is punishable as a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2025, the Franchise Tax Board to provide tax returns or return information necessary for the Controller to make specified payments, and makes the information received by the Controller subject to limitation on the collection and use of that information. This bill would extend the above authorization to January 1, 2027, and provide, until January 1, 2027, the board the same authorization to disclose return or return information to the Controller to make payments to qualified recipients pursuant to the bill and to any third-party vendor with an existing contract for services relating to the distribution of payments to qualified recipients to provide services relating to the distribution of those payments. The bill would make the information provided to the Controller and a third-party vendor subject to the limitation on the collection and use of that information. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) The California Constitution generally prohibits the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and each local government from exceeding the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior fiscal year, adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population, and prescribes procedures for making adjustments to the appropriations limit. The California Constitution excludes certain specified appropriations as exempt from this total annual limit, including tax refunds. This bill would provide that the appropriations made by the bill are appropriations for purposes of refunding state tax liability incurred by Californians during the 2021–22 fiscal year, are not subject to the annual appropriations limit set by the California Constitution. The bill would make related findings and declarations. (8) This bill would make findings and declarations related to a gift of public funds. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 192?
AB 192 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 192?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 192?
Track AB 192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 192

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 192

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →