AB 2926 — Employee obligations: exclusivity options.
Last action — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, except as specified, prohibits enforcement of a personal service contract beyond 7 years from the commencement of service under the contract. Under existing law, an employee who is a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords is prohibited from invoking this provision without first giving written notice to the employer that the employee, from and after a specified date, will no longer render service under the contract by reason of the above provision. Existing law specifies that a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords may still pursue an action for certain damages. This bill would eliminate that provision requiring an employee who is a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords to give written notice and would also repeal the provisions related to damages. This bill would instead prohibit a contract for the exclusive personal services of a music talent, as defined, from containing a term that includes option periods that extend more than 9 months after the initial commercial release of the applicable music product. The bill would authorize a music talent, if their option has not been formally exercised within that time period, to terminate at any time their personal services agreement by sending notice to the contracting party. The bill, if a music talent willingly renegotiates an existing recording contract with a record company, would deem a new 7-year period to commence on the execution date of such renegotiated recording contract, if it meets prescribed criteria. This bill, except under prescribed circumstances, would prohibit a contract for the personal or professional services of an employee from prohibiting an employee from working for multiple employers. This bill would prohibit the waiver of any of its provisions in an individual contract negotiation, a collective bargaining agreement, or other agreement. The bill would provide that it applies to existing and future recording agreements and employment contracts. The bill would provide that it voids any provision in a contract that would deprive an employee or recording artist of its protections.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/18/22 - Introduced Current pdf February 18, 2022
- AB2926 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Ash Kalra · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Kalra, Ash Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2926 do?
- Existing law, except as specified, prohibits enforcement of a personal service contract beyond 7 years from the commencement of service under the contract. Under existing law, an employee who is a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords is prohibited from invoking this provision without first giving written notice to the employer that the employee, from and after a specified date, will no longer render service under the contract by reason of the above provision. Existing law specifies that a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords may still pursue an action for certain damages. This bill would eliminate that provision requiring an employee who is a party to a contract to render personal services in the production of specified phonorecords to give written notice and would also repeal the provisions related to damages. This bill would instead prohibit a contract for the exclusive personal services of a music talent, as defined, from containing a term that includes option periods that extend more than 9 months after the initial commercial release of the applicable music product. The bill would authorize a music talent, if their option has not been formally exercised within that time period, to terminate at any time their personal services agreement by sending notice to the contracting party. The bill, if a music talent willingly renegotiates an existing recording contract with a record company, would deem a new 7-year period to commence on the execution date of such renegotiated recording contract, if it meets prescribed criteria. This bill, except under prescribed circumstances, would prohibit a contract for the personal or professional services of an employee from prohibiting an employee from working for multiple employers. This bill would prohibit the waiver of any of its provisions in an individual contract negotiation, a collective bargaining agreement, or other agreement. The bill would provide that it applies to existing and future recording agreements and employment contracts. The bill would provide that it voids any provision in a contract that would deprive an employee or recording artist of its protections.
- Who sponsors AB 2926?
- AB 2926 is sponsored by Kalra, Ash (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2926?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2926?
- Track AB 2926 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2926
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2926
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →