Public safety.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 177 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 177.
You're tracking AB 177
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 177 — Public safety.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2021.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a presiding judge of a superior court to request that the Chairperson of the Judicial Council order the court to take certain actions when war, an act of terrorism, public unrest or calamity, epidemic, natural disaster, or other substantial risk to the health and welfare of court personnel or the public, or the danger thereof, threatens the orderly operation of the courts or makes court facilities unsafe, including, but not limited to, holding court sessions anywhere within the county, transferring civil cases to another county, or extending the time periods for bringing an action to trial, as specified. Existing law further authorizes the Chairperson of the Judicial Council to issue an order of their own accord authorizing multiple courts to implement some or all of that relief if the chairperson determines that emergency conditions threaten the orderly operation of superior court locations in more than one county, or render presence in, or access to, affected facilities unsafe. By executive order, the Governor authorized the Judicial Council or its Chairperson to take action, via emergency order or statewide rule, necessary to maintain the safe and orderly operation of the courts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as specified. This bill would, until January 31, 2022, provide the Judicial Council and its Chairperson with continuing emergency authority, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to submit a report to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2023, on the use of remote technology in civil actions by the trial courts, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to convene a working group for the purpose of recommending a statewide framework for remote civil court proceedings that addresses equal and fair access to justice, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to submit a report with the working group's recommendations to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2023. (2) Existing law requires a fee for the transcription for an original ribbon or printed copy of a court transcript to be $0.85 for each 100 words, and for each copy purchased at the same time by the court, party, or other person purchasing the original to be $0.15 for each 100 words. Existing law also requires a fee for the first copy to any court, party, or other person who does not simultaneously purchase the original to be $0.20 for each 100 words, and for each additional copy, purchased at the same time, to be $0.15 for each 100 words. This bill would increase those fees, as specified, including an increase to $1.13 for each 100 words of transcription for original ribbon or printed copy and $0.20 for each copy purchased at the same time by the court, party, or other person purchasing the original. The bill would specifically prohibit a trial court from unilaterally changing its practice and policy as to the number of words or folios on a typical transcript page. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2024, to report to the Legislature recommendations to increase uniformity in transcription rate expenditures in California. (3) Existing law authorizes a court reporter to charge an additional 50% for special daily service for transcription in civil cases. This bill would delete the reference to civil cases, resulting in an authorization for the reporter to charge an additional 50% for special daily service for transcription in all cases. (4) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations, as specified. This bill would require that tool to allow a defendant, a designee of the defendant, or the defendant's attorney, to, upon certification, access the online tool. (5) Existing law imposes various fees contingent upon a criminal arrest, prosecution, or conviction for the cost of administering the criminal justice system, including lab fees, drug testing, and incarceration, among others. This bill would, on January 1, 2022, repeal the authority to collect many of these fees, among others. The bill would make the unpaid balance of many court-imposed costs unenforceable and uncollectible and would require any portion of a judgment imposing those costs to be vacated. (6) Existing law imposes, as specified, a $25 administrative screening fee to be collected from each person arrested and released on their own recognizance, and a $10 citation processing fee to be collected from each person cited and released by any peace officer in the field or at a jail facility, for any criminal offense other than an infraction. This bill would repeal the authority to collect this fee and would make any unpaid balance unenforceable and uncollectible and would require any portion of a judgment imposing this fee to be vacated. (7) This bill would appropriate $25,000,000 in the 2021–22 fiscal year, and $50,000,000 in the 2022–23 fiscal year and each year thereafter, from the General Fund to the Controller for allocation pursuant to a schedule provided by the Department of Finance to counties to backfill revenues lost from the repeal of fees in this bill, as provided, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would make other conforming changes. (8) This bill would incorporates additional changes to Section 1203.4a of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1281 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1281 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 1203.9 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 898 to be operative only if this bill and AB 898 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/21 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2021
- Enrolled 09/13/21 - Enrolled pdf September 13, 2021
- Amended 09/05/21 - Amended Senate pdf September 05, 2021
- Amended 02/18/21 - Amended Assembly pdf February 18, 2021
- Introduced 01/08/21 - Introduced pdf January 08, 2021
- AB177 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2021.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 3057.).
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 19. Page 3049.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 2579.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (September 7).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
(Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2303.)
-
Senate rules suspended.
-
Joint Rule 61 suspended. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2302.)
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 18. Page 500.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 432.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 17 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 19 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 56 | 18 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 23% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Kamlager | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 177 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes a presiding judge of a superior court to request that the Chairperson of the Judicial Council order the court to take certain actions when war, an act of terrorism, public unrest or calamity, epidemic, natural disaster, or other substantial risk to the health and welfare of court personnel or the public, or the danger thereof, threatens the orderly operation of the courts or makes court facilities unsafe, including, but not limited to, holding court sessions anywhere within the county, transferring civil cases to another county, or extending the time periods for bringing an action to trial, as specified. Existing law further authorizes the Chairperson of the Judicial Council to issue an order of their own accord authorizing multiple courts to implement some or all of that relief if the chairperson determines that emergency conditions threaten the orderly operation of superior court locations in more than one county, or render presence in, or access to, affected facilities unsafe. By executive order, the Governor authorized the Judicial Council or its Chairperson to take action, via emergency order or statewide rule, necessary to maintain the safe and orderly operation of the courts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as specified. This bill would, until January 31, 2022, provide the Judicial Council and its Chairperson with continuing emergency authority, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to submit a report to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2023, on the use of remote technology in civil actions by the trial courts, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to convene a working group for the purpose of recommending a statewide framework for remote civil court proceedings that addresses equal and fair access to justice, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to submit a report with the working group's recommendations to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2023. (2) Existing law requires a fee for the transcription for an original ribbon or printed copy of a court transcript to be $0.85 for each 100 words, and for each copy purchased at the same time by the court, party, or other person purchasing the original to be $0.15 for each 100 words. Existing law also requires a fee for the first copy to any court, party, or other person who does not simultaneously purchase the original to be $0.20 for each 100 words, and for each additional copy, purchased at the same time, to be $0.15 for each 100 words. This bill would increase those fees, as specified, including an increase to $1.13 for each 100 words of transcription for original ribbon or printed copy and $0.20 for each copy purchased at the same time by the court, party, or other person purchasing the original. The bill would specifically prohibit a trial court from unilaterally changing its practice and policy as to the number of words or folios on a typical transcript page. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2024, to report to the Legislature recommendations to increase uniformity in transcription rate expenditures in California. (3) Existing law authorizes a court reporter to charge an additional 50% for special daily service for transcription in civil cases. This bill would delete the reference to civil cases, resulting in an authorization for the reporter to charge an additional 50% for special daily service for transcription in all cases. (4) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations, as specified. This bill would require that tool to allow a defendant, a designee of the defendant, or the defendant's attorney, to, upon certification, access the online tool. (5) Existing law imposes various fees contingent upon a criminal arrest, prosecution, or conviction for the cost of administering the criminal justice system, including lab fees, drug testing, and incarceration, among others. This bill would, on January 1, 2022, repeal the authority to collect many of these fees, among others. The bill would make the unpaid balance of many court-imposed costs unenforceable and uncollectible and would require any portion of a judgment imposing those costs to be vacated. (6) Existing law imposes, as specified, a $25 administrative screening fee to be collected from each person arrested and released on their own recognizance, and a $10 citation processing fee to be collected from each person cited and released by any peace officer in the field or at a jail facility, for any criminal offense other than an infraction. This bill would repeal the authority to collect this fee and would make any unpaid balance unenforceable and uncollectible and would require any portion of a judgment imposing this fee to be vacated. (7) This bill would appropriate $25,000,000 in the 2021–22 fiscal year, and $50,000,000 in the 2022–23 fiscal year and each year thereafter, from the General Fund to the Controller for allocation pursuant to a schedule provided by the Department of Finance to counties to backfill revenues lost from the repeal of fees in this bill, as provided, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would make other conforming changes. (8) This bill would incorporates additional changes to Section 1203.4a of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1281 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1281 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 1203.9 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 898 to be operative only if this bill and AB 898 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors AB 177?
- AB 177 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
- What is the current status of AB 177?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 177?
- Track AB 177 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 177
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 177
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →