California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 149 — Transportation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 81, Statutes of 2021.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Wildlife Conservation Law of 1947 establishes the Wildlife Conservation Board in the Department of Fish and Wildlife and permits the board to authorize the acquisition of real property, rights in real property, water, or water rights for wildlife conservation purposes. Existing law requires the department, when authorized by the board, to construct facilities that are suitable for the purpose for which the real property or rights in real property or water, or water rights were acquired. This bill would authorize the board to name a nonvehicular wildlife crossing, which the bill would define as a structure that allows animals to cross human-made barriers safely, if at least 25% of the funding to construct the crossing derives from a state source. The bill would require the board to consult with the Department of Transportation or other appropriate entities on the design of lettering and placement of any sign that displays the name of a nonvehicular wildlife crossing. The bill would authorize the board to adopt criteria to implement these provisions. (2) Existing law authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to assume the responsibilities of the United States Secretary of Transportation under the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other federal environmental laws for any railroad, public transportation, or multimodal project undertaken by state agencies, as specified. Existing law provides that the State of California consents to the jurisdiction of the federal courts with regard to the compliance, discharge, or enforcement of these responsibilities. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2022. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2025. (3) Existing law provides for the allocation of revenues from various charges to transit operators and local transportation agencies that meet specified requirements, including, as applicable, requirements related to operating costs, fare box ratios, and revenues, as specified. Existing law excludes certain costs, including startup costs for new services, from the definition of "operating costs" for those and related purposes. Existing law exempts those entities, for fiscal years 2019–20, 2020–21, and 2021–22, as specified, from penalties or other provisions that would reduce the amount of revenues allocated as a result of failing to meet those requirements. This bill would exclude additional specified costs from the definition of "operating costs" for those purposes. The bill would extend those entities' exemptions through the 2022–23 fiscal year, as specified. The bill, until July 1, 2026, would exempt from specified requirements related to fare box ratios and eligibility standards an operator for a fiscal year in which the operator expended from local funding, as defined, an amount for transit operations not less than the amount the operator expended from local funding for transit operations during the 2018–19 fiscal year. The bill would require the Department of Transportation, on or before November 30, 2025, to submit a report to the Legislature on the revenue vehicle hours, ridership, and passenger mile impacts on the services offered by these exempted operators. The bill, for purposes of meeting certain ratios of fare revenues to operating costs, would authorize an operator to calculate all free and reduced transit fares at their current full retail value, and to include federal grant funds as local funds for those purposes. (4) Existing law requires transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, transit development boards, and operators to triennially undergo performance audits to evaluate their efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of operation. This bill would require the Department of Transportation, in consultation with transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and transit development boards, on or before November 30, 2021, to review the requirements for, and submit a report to the Legislature on, those performance audits to identify opportunities for streamlining and to make them more effective. (5) The Vehicle License Fee Law, in addition to any other fee imposed on a vehicle by that law or by the Vehicle Code, imposes a transportation improvement fee on each vehicle and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation to transit agencies pursuant to specified formulas. Existing law restricts the expenditure of moneys under this program to (A) transit capital projects or services to maintain or repair a transit operator's existing transit vehicle fleet or existing transit facilities; (B) the design, acquisition, and construction of new vehicles or facilities that improve existing transit services; or (C) transit services that complement local efforts for repair and improvement of local transportation infrastructure. Existing law authorizes the recipient transit agency to instead expend funds apportioned for the 2019–20 to 2021–22, inclusive, fiscal years under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes a specified declaration. This bill would authorize a recipient transit agency to additionally expend funds apportioned for the 2022–23 fiscal year under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes that specified declaration. By expanding the purposes for which continuously appropriated funds may be used, the bill would make an appropriation. If the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes this declaration, the bill would exempt the recipient transit agency from certain procedural, reporting, and accounting requirements of the State of Good Repair Program with respect to the receipt and expenditure of those funds. (6) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with possession and control of the state highway system and associated property, and requires the department to improve and maintain state highways, as defined. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into an agreement to accept funds, materials, equipment, or services for maintenance or roadside enhancement, including the cleanup and abatement of litter, of a section of a state highway. This bill would authorize the department, upon the completion of a scheduled cleanup and abatement of litter pursuant to one of these agreements entered into with an individual, organization, agency, or business that has been issued an Adopt-A-Highway permit, to provide a $250 stipend to the individual, organization, agency, or business. This bill would establish the Clean California Local Grant Program of 2021, to be administered by the department, to provide funding, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to allocate grants to local and public agencies, among other entities, for purposes of beautifying and cleaning up local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. The bill would require the department to develop guidelines, including project selection criteria and program evaluation metrics, that include, but are not limited to, a process for allocating no less than 50% of the program funds to projects that benefit underserved communities, to be defined by the department, and requirements for local matching of funds of no more than 50% of the total project cost. The bill would require the guidelines to also include specified project types eligible for funding, a limitation of $5,000,000 maximum per grant award, and a prohibition on grants that fund projects that displace persons experiencing homelessness. The bill would authorize the department to allow, and develop guidelines for, advance payments to public agency grant applicants if certain conditions are met. This bill would establish the Clean California State Beautification Program of 2021 to provide funding, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of beautifying and cleaning up state highways. The bill would require the department to develop project selection criteria and program evaluation metrics and identify eligible projects. The bill would require the department to include in its project selection criteria specified components, including, but not limited to, the potential for a project to enhance and beautify public spaces, the benefit to underserved communities, to be defined by the department, and project types eligible for funding, such as greening and landscaping projects, gateway community identification projects, and enhanced infrastructure safety measures. The bill would, consistent with applicable department policies and guidelines, prohibit program funds from being used to displace persons experiencing homelessness. (7) The State Contract Act generally provides for a contracting process by state agencies for public works of improvement pursuant to a competitive bidding process, under which bids are awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, with specified alternative procurement procedures authorized in certain cases. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to use job order contracting to construct projects funded pursuant to the Clean California State Beautification Program of 2021, referenced above. The bill would require the department to establish a procedure to prequalify job order contractors and to establish specified documents for each job order contract, as provided. The bill would delegate to the department the authority necessary to carry out the purchase of vehicles, equipment, or other products as needed to implement the department's supplemental Fleet Acquisition Plan Fiscal Year 2021–22 for the acquisition of 269 medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and equipment to support litter abatement. The bill would require, as part of the 2022–23 and 2023–24 budgets, the department to report to the Legislature on these two programs, including, but not limited to, the vehicles and equipment purchased, cubic yards of litter collected, and any other important project or program outcomes. (8) Existing law prohibits the Department of Transportation, until July 1, 2021, from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery, as outlined in the department's Indirect Cost Recovery Proposal. Existing law requires the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead until July 1, 2021. This bill would extend those provisions until January 1, 2023. (9) Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program and, after certain allocations for the program are made, requires the remaining funds available for the program to be allocated 50% for maintenance of the state highway system or for purposes of the state highway operation and protection program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. Before receiving an apportionment of funds under the program from the Controller in a fiscal year, existing law requires a city or county to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. In order to receive an allocation or apportionment of these funds, existing law requires the city or county to annually expend a certain minimum amount from its general fund for street, road, and highway purposes. This bill would provide that cities and counties are not required to comply with the annual minimum expenditure requirements in the 2019–20 fiscal year. The bill would require the Controller to adjust the annual minimum expenditure requirements in the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years in proportion to any decrease in taxable sales within the applicable city or county between specified fiscal years. Under a specified circumstance, the bill would authorize a city or county to petition the Controller to use transient occupancy tax revenues, in lieu of taxable sales, for purposes of making these adjustments. (10) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue to a person a driver's license as applied for when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license. Existing law requires the license to state specified information, including the true name, age, and mailing address of the licensee and a brief description and engraved picture or photograph of the licensee for the purpose of identification. Existing law authorizes the department to issue an identification card to any person attesting to their true full name, correct age, and other identifying data as certified by the applicant for the identification card. This bill would authorize the department to establish a pilot program to evaluate the use of optional mobile or digital alternatives to driver's licenses and identification cards, subject to certain requirements, including, but not limited to, the voluntary participation of persons in the program and a limitation on the percentage of licensed drivers that can participate in the program. The bill would require the department, in developing and implementing the use of digital driver's licenses and identification cards, to ensure the protection of personal information and include specified security features that protect against unauthorized access to information. The bill would require the department, if it conducts the pilot program, to submit a report to the Legislature, no later than July 1, 2026, that includes specified information. The bill would also require the department, as part of the 2022–23 budget, to report to the Legislature on the status of the pilot program, as provided. (11) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 81, Statutes of 2021.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2204.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 2202.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 2202.)

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1759.).

  9. Senate Rule 29 suspended. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 1750.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (June 30).

  12. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 1658.)

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  14. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 1627.)

  15. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 18. Page 486.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Ordered to second reading.

  20. Withdrawn from committee.

  21. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 432.)

  22. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  27. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23000
Democratic 12001
Republican 4000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Min — Yea
Pan — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Newman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Not Voting
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25001
Unaffiliated 44000
Republican 9000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gray — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Chau — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Republican 3000
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 17001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Pan — Yea
Min — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Newman — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 18 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25200
Unaffiliated 31704
Republican 0901
Total 561805
% of votes cast 71%23%0%6%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Kamlager — Not Voting
Quirk — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Smith — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 149 do?
(1) The Wildlife Conservation Law of 1947 establishes the Wildlife Conservation Board in the Department of Fish and Wildlife and permits the board to authorize the acquisition of real property, rights in real property, water, or water rights for wildlife conservation purposes. Existing law requires the department, when authorized by the board, to construct facilities that are suitable for the purpose for which the real property or rights in real property or water, or water rights were acquired. This bill would authorize the board to name a nonvehicular wildlife crossing, which the bill would define as a structure that allows animals to cross human-made barriers safely, if at least 25% of the funding to construct the crossing derives from a state source. The bill would require the board to consult with the Department of Transportation or other appropriate entities on the design of lettering and placement of any sign that displays the name of a nonvehicular wildlife crossing. The bill would authorize the board to adopt criteria to implement these provisions. (2) Existing law authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to assume the responsibilities of the United States Secretary of Transportation under the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other federal environmental laws for any railroad, public transportation, or multimodal project undertaken by state agencies, as specified. Existing law provides that the State of California consents to the jurisdiction of the federal courts with regard to the compliance, discharge, or enforcement of these responsibilities. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2022. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2025. (3) Existing law provides for the allocation of revenues from various charges to transit operators and local transportation agencies that meet specified requirements, including, as applicable, requirements related to operating costs, fare box ratios, and revenues, as specified. Existing law excludes certain costs, including startup costs for new services, from the definition of "operating costs" for those and related purposes. Existing law exempts those entities, for fiscal years 2019–20, 2020–21, and 2021–22, as specified, from penalties or other provisions that would reduce the amount of revenues allocated as a result of failing to meet those requirements. This bill would exclude additional specified costs from the definition of "operating costs" for those purposes. The bill would extend those entities' exemptions through the 2022–23 fiscal year, as specified. The bill, until July 1, 2026, would exempt from specified requirements related to fare box ratios and eligibility standards an operator for a fiscal year in which the operator expended from local funding, as defined, an amount for transit operations not less than the amount the operator expended from local funding for transit operations during the 2018–19 fiscal year. The bill would require the Department of Transportation, on or before November 30, 2025, to submit a report to the Legislature on the revenue vehicle hours, ridership, and passenger mile impacts on the services offered by these exempted operators. The bill, for purposes of meeting certain ratios of fare revenues to operating costs, would authorize an operator to calculate all free and reduced transit fares at their current full retail value, and to include federal grant funds as local funds for those purposes. (4) Existing law requires transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, transit development boards, and operators to triennially undergo performance audits to evaluate their efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of operation. This bill would require the Department of Transportation, in consultation with transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and transit development boards, on or before November 30, 2021, to review the requirements for, and submit a report to the Legislature on, those performance audits to identify opportunities for streamlining and to make them more effective. (5) The Vehicle License Fee Law, in addition to any other fee imposed on a vehicle by that law or by the Vehicle Code, imposes a transportation improvement fee on each vehicle and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation to transit agencies pursuant to specified formulas. Existing law restricts the expenditure of moneys under this program to (A) transit capital projects or services to maintain or repair a transit operator's existing transit vehicle fleet or existing transit facilities; (B) the design, acquisition, and construction of new vehicles or facilities that improve existing transit services; or (C) transit services that complement local efforts for repair and improvement of local transportation infrastructure. Existing law authorizes the recipient transit agency to instead expend funds apportioned for the 2019–20 to 2021–22, inclusive, fiscal years under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes a specified declaration. This bill would authorize a recipient transit agency to additionally expend funds apportioned for the 2022–23 fiscal year under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes that specified declaration. By expanding the purposes for which continuously appropriated funds may be used, the bill would make an appropriation. If the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes this declaration, the bill would exempt the recipient transit agency from certain procedural, reporting, and accounting requirements of the State of Good Repair Program with respect to the receipt and expenditure of those funds. (6) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with possession and control of the state highway system and associated property, and requires the department to improve and maintain state highways, as defined. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into an agreement to accept funds, materials, equipment, or services for maintenance or roadside enhancement, including the cleanup and abatement of litter, of a section of a state highway. This bill would authorize the department, upon the completion of a scheduled cleanup and abatement of litter pursuant to one of these agreements entered into with an individual, organization, agency, or business that has been issued an Adopt-A-Highway permit, to provide a $250 stipend to the individual, organization, agency, or business. This bill would establish the Clean California Local Grant Program of 2021, to be administered by the department, to provide funding, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to allocate grants to local and public agencies, among other entities, for purposes of beautifying and cleaning up local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. The bill would require the department to develop guidelines, including project selection criteria and program evaluation metrics, that include, but are not limited to, a process for allocating no less than 50% of the program funds to projects that benefit underserved communities, to be defined by the department, and requirements for local matching of funds of no more than 50% of the total project cost. The bill would require the guidelines to also include specified project types eligible for funding, a limitation of $5,000,000 maximum per grant award, and a prohibition on grants that fund projects that displace persons experiencing homelessness. The bill would authorize the department to allow, and develop guidelines for, advance payments to public agency grant applicants if certain conditions are met. This bill would establish the Clean California State Beautification Program of 2021 to provide funding, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of beautifying and cleaning up state highways. The bill would require the department to develop project selection criteria and program evaluation metrics and identify eligible projects. The bill would require the department to include in its project selection criteria specified components, including, but not limited to, the potential for a project to enhance and beautify public spaces, the benefit to underserved communities, to be defined by the department, and project types eligible for funding, such as greening and landscaping projects, gateway community identification projects, and enhanced infrastructure safety measures. The bill would, consistent with applicable department policies and guidelines, prohibit program funds from being used to displace persons experiencing homelessness. (7) The State Contract Act generally provides for a contracting process by state agencies for public works of improvement pursuant to a competitive bidding process, under which bids are awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, with specified alternative procurement procedures authorized in certain cases. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to use job order contracting to construct projects funded pursuant to the Clean California State Beautification Program of 2021, referenced above. The bill would require the department to establish a procedure to prequalify job order contractors and to establish specified documents for each job order contract, as provided. The bill would delegate to the department the authority necessary to carry out the purchase of vehicles, equipment, or other products as needed to implement the department's supplemental Fleet Acquisition Plan Fiscal Year 2021–22 for the acquisition of 269 medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and equipment to support litter abatement. The bill would require, as part of the 2022–23 and 2023–24 budgets, the department to report to the Legislature on these two programs, including, but not limited to, the vehicles and equipment purchased, cubic yards of litter collected, and any other important project or program outcomes. (8) Existing law prohibits the Department of Transportation, until July 1, 2021, from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery, as outlined in the department's Indirect Cost Recovery Proposal. Existing law requires the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead until July 1, 2021. This bill would extend those provisions until January 1, 2023. (9) Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program and, after certain allocations for the program are made, requires the remaining funds available for the program to be allocated 50% for maintenance of the state highway system or for purposes of the state highway operation and protection program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. Before receiving an apportionment of funds under the program from the Controller in a fiscal year, existing law requires a city or county to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. In order to receive an allocation or apportionment of these funds, existing law requires the city or county to annually expend a certain minimum amount from its general fund for street, road, and highway purposes. This bill would provide that cities and counties are not required to comply with the annual minimum expenditure requirements in the 2019–20 fiscal year. The bill would require the Controller to adjust the annual minimum expenditure requirements in the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years in proportion to any decrease in taxable sales within the applicable city or county between specified fiscal years. Under a specified circumstance, the bill would authorize a city or county to petition the Controller to use transient occupancy tax revenues, in lieu of taxable sales, for purposes of making these adjustments. (10) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue to a person a driver's license as applied for when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license. Existing law requires the license to state specified information, including the true name, age, and mailing address of the licensee and a brief description and engraved picture or photograph of the licensee for the purpose of identification. Existing law authorizes the department to issue an identification card to any person attesting to their true full name, correct age, and other identifying data as certified by the applicant for the identification card. This bill would authorize the department to establish a pilot program to evaluate the use of optional mobile or digital alternatives to driver's licenses and identification cards, subject to certain requirements, including, but not limited to, the voluntary participation of persons in the program and a limitation on the percentage of licensed drivers that can participate in the program. The bill would require the department, in developing and implementing the use of digital driver's licenses and identification cards, to ensure the protection of personal information and include specified security features that protect against unauthorized access to information. The bill would require the department, if it conducts the pilot program, to submit a report to the Legislature, no later than July 1, 2026, that includes specified information. The bill would also require the department, as part of the 2022–23 budget, to report to the Legislature on the status of the pilot program, as provided. (11) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 149?
AB 149 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 149?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 149?
Track AB 149 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 149

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 149

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →