California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 152 — COVID-19 relief: supplemental paid sick leave.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 736, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, also known as GO-Biz, to serve the Governor as the lead entity for economic strategy and the marketing of California on issues relating to business development, private sector investment, and economic growth. Existing law prescribes the duties and functions of the Director of the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. This bill would establish the California Small Business and Nonprofit COVID-19 Relief Grant Program within GO-Biz to assist qualified small businesses or nonprofits that are incurring costs for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave. The bill would require GO-Biz to provide grants to qualified small businesses or nonprofits, as defined. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, entitles an employee who works in California for the same employer for 30 or more days within a year from the commencement of employment to paid sick days. Under existing law, an employee accrues paid sick days at a rate of not less than one hour per every 30 hours worked, subject to certain use, accrual, and yearly carryover limitations. Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner to enforce the act and provides for procedures, including investigation and hearing, and for remedies and penalties. Existing law, beginning January 1, 2022, and until September 30, 2022, provides for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for covered employees who are unable to work or telework due to certain reasons related to COVID-19, as specified, and entitles a covered employee to 40 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as prescribed. Existing law additionally entitles a covered employee to take up to 40 more hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the covered employee, or a family member for whom the covered employee is providing care, tests positive for COVID-19. Existing law provides that the total number of hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave to which a covered employee is entitled to under these provisions is in addition to any paid sick leave available under the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, and in addition to prior COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave the employee was entitled to, as specified. Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner to enforce these COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave provisions. With respect to the provisions relating to the COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as specified above, existing law specifies that an employer does not have any obligation to provide additional COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the employee refuses to provide documentation of a test result. Existing law authorizes the employer to require the covered employee, if that employee tests positive, to submit to another test on or after the fifth day after the first positive test and provide documentation of those results. Existing law requires the employer to provide that test at no cost to the employee. This bill would additionally specify an employer has no obligation to provide additional COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the employee refuses to submit to the above-mentioned tests, as specified. The bill would authorize the employer to require, if the diagnostic test is positive, the employee to submit to a second diagnostic test within no less than 24 hours. The bill would require the employer to provide both tests at no cost to the employee. The bill would extend those provisions from September 30, 2022, to December 31, 2022. (3) Existing law, beginning January 1, 2022, and until September 30, 2022, provides for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for specified in-home supportive service providers and waiver personal care service providers, as defined, who are unable to work due to certain reasons related to COVID-19. Under existing law, a provider is entitled to COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for the same reasons as a covered employee. Existing law entitles a provider to up to 40 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as prescribed, among other things. This bill would extend those provisions from September 30, 2022, to December 31, 2022. (4) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in conformity with federal income tax law, generally define "gross income" as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provide various exclusions from gross income. This bill would exclude, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2030, from gross income grant allocations received by a taxpayer pursuant to the California Small Business and Nonprofit COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Relief Grant Program, as specified. The bill would set forth procedures for recapturing grant amounts if GO-Biz determines that the grantee has failed to meet the criteria for a qualified small business or nonprofit. (5) This bill would state that its provisions are severable. (6) This bill would also make findings and declarations related to a gift of public funds. (7) This bill would make an appropriation of $10,000 from the General Fund to the Labor Commissioner for purposes of implementing the changes made to the provisions relating to COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave described above. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 736, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 0.).

  7. Senate rules suspended. (Ayes 31. Noes 9.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 29).

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  13. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Senate Rule 29 suspended. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 1658.)

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4. Page 1691.) (June 28).

  16. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 1627.)

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  18. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 18. Page 487.)

  22. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  23. Ordered to second reading.

  24. Withdrawn from committee.

  25. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 432.)

  26. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  31. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32000
Unaffiliated 38001
Republican 9000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Wood — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mayes — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18005
Republican 1003
Democratic 13000
Total 32008
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Borgeas — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Glazer — Yea
Pan — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Newman — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Min — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8002
Democratic 6000
Republican 1002
Total 15004
% of votes cast 79%0%0%21%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Newman — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Roth — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Min — Yea
Pan — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 12 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6102
Democratic 6000
Republican 0300
Total 12402
% of votes cast 67%22%0%11%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Min — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Newman — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Melendez — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 18 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25200
Unaffiliated 31704
Republican 0901
Total 561805
% of votes cast 71%23%0%6%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Smith — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Kamlager — Not Voting
Quirk — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 152 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, also known as GO-Biz, to serve the Governor as the lead entity for economic strategy and the marketing of California on issues relating to business development, private sector investment, and economic growth. Existing law prescribes the duties and functions of the Director of the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. This bill would establish the California Small Business and Nonprofit COVID-19 Relief Grant Program within GO-Biz to assist qualified small businesses or nonprofits that are incurring costs for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave. The bill would require GO-Biz to provide grants to qualified small businesses or nonprofits, as defined. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, entitles an employee who works in California for the same employer for 30 or more days within a year from the commencement of employment to paid sick days. Under existing law, an employee accrues paid sick days at a rate of not less than one hour per every 30 hours worked, subject to certain use, accrual, and yearly carryover limitations. Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner to enforce the act and provides for procedures, including investigation and hearing, and for remedies and penalties. Existing law, beginning January 1, 2022, and until September 30, 2022, provides for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for covered employees who are unable to work or telework due to certain reasons related to COVID-19, as specified, and entitles a covered employee to 40 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as prescribed. Existing law additionally entitles a covered employee to take up to 40 more hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the covered employee, or a family member for whom the covered employee is providing care, tests positive for COVID-19. Existing law provides that the total number of hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave to which a covered employee is entitled to under these provisions is in addition to any paid sick leave available under the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, and in addition to prior COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave the employee was entitled to, as specified. Existing law requires the Labor Commissioner to enforce these COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave provisions. With respect to the provisions relating to the COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as specified above, existing law specifies that an employer does not have any obligation to provide additional COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the employee refuses to provide documentation of a test result. Existing law authorizes the employer to require the covered employee, if that employee tests positive, to submit to another test on or after the fifth day after the first positive test and provide documentation of those results. Existing law requires the employer to provide that test at no cost to the employee. This bill would additionally specify an employer has no obligation to provide additional COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave if the employee refuses to submit to the above-mentioned tests, as specified. The bill would authorize the employer to require, if the diagnostic test is positive, the employee to submit to a second diagnostic test within no less than 24 hours. The bill would require the employer to provide both tests at no cost to the employee. The bill would extend those provisions from September 30, 2022, to December 31, 2022. (3) Existing law, beginning January 1, 2022, and until September 30, 2022, provides for COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for specified in-home supportive service providers and waiver personal care service providers, as defined, who are unable to work due to certain reasons related to COVID-19. Under existing law, a provider is entitled to COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave for the same reasons as a covered employee. Existing law entitles a provider to up to 40 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave, as prescribed, among other things. This bill would extend those provisions from September 30, 2022, to December 31, 2022. (4) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in conformity with federal income tax law, generally define "gross income" as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provide various exclusions from gross income. This bill would exclude, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2030, from gross income grant allocations received by a taxpayer pursuant to the California Small Business and Nonprofit COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Relief Grant Program, as specified. The bill would set forth procedures for recapturing grant amounts if GO-Biz determines that the grantee has failed to meet the criteria for a qualified small business or nonprofit. (5) This bill would state that its provisions are severable. (6) This bill would also make findings and declarations related to a gift of public funds. (7) This bill would make an appropriation of $10,000 from the General Fund to the Labor Commissioner for purposes of implementing the changes made to the provisions relating to COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave described above. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 152?
AB 152 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 152?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 152?
Track AB 152 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 152

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 152

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →