California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

AB 2782 — Mobilehome parks: change of use: rent control.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 35, Statutes of 2020.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, requires the management of a mobilehome park to comply with notice and specified other requirements in order to terminate a tenancy in a mobilehome park due to a change of use of the mobilehome park, including giving homeowners at least 15 days' written notice that the management will be appearing before a local governmental board, commission, or body to request permits for the change of use. This bill would instead require the management to give homeowners at least 60 days' written notice that the management will be appearing before a local governmental board, commission, or body to obtain local approval for the intended change of use of the mobilehome park. Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a person or entity proposing a change in use of a mobilehome park to file a report on the impact of the conversion, closure, or cessation of use upon the displaced residents of the mobilehome park that includes, among other things, the availability of adequate replacement housing in mobilehome parks and relocation costs. Existing law requires the person proposing the change in use to provide the report to a resident of each mobilehome park at least 15 days before the hearing on the impact report by the advisory agency or legislative body. Existing law requires the legislative body or advisory agency to review the report before any change of use, and authorizes the legislative body or advisory agency, as a condition of the change of use, to require the person or entity to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to find adequate housing in a mobilehome park. This bill would, instead, require that report to include a replacement and relocation plan that adequately mitigates the impact on the ability of displaced residents of the mobilehome park to be converted or closed to find adequate housing in a mobilehome park. The bill would also require the person or entity proposing the change in use to pay for, and include in that report, an appraisal that determines, as specified, the in-place market value of a mobilehome of a displaced resident who cannot obtain adequate housing in another mobilehome park. The bill would require the person proposing the change in use to provide the report to a resident of each mobilehome in the mobilehome park at least 60 days before the hearing. The bill would require the legislative body or advisory agency, before approving the change of use, to review the report and any additional relevant documentation and to make a finding as to whether or not approval of the park closure and the park's conversion into its intended new use, taking into consideration both the impact report as a whole and the overall housing availability within the local jurisdiction, will result in or materially contribute to a shortage of housing opportunities and choices for low- and moderate-income households within the local jurisdiction. By placing new requirements on local legislative bodies when approving permits for a change of use for mobilehome parks, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the person or entity proposing the change in use to pay to a displaced resident unable to obtain adequate housing in another mobilehome park the in-place market value of the displaced resident's mobilehome. Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, requires an impact report to be filed at the time of filing a tentative or parcel map for a subdivision to be created from the conversion of a mobilehome park or floating home marina to another use that, among other things, addresses the availability of adequate replacement space in mobilehome parks or floating home marinas, and requires the subdivider to make the report available to each resident of the mobilehome park or floating home marina at least 15 days before the hearing on the map filing by the advisory agency or legislative body. Existing law authorizes a legislative body or advisory agency to require the subdivider to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to find adequate space in a mobilehome park or floating home marina. Under existing law, any violation of the Subdivision Map Act is a misdemeanor. This bill would, instead, require the report to meet requirements of the Planning and Zoning Law relating to the conversion of a mobilehome park to another use, as described above. The bill would also apply those requirements to conversion of a floating marina. The bill would require the legislative body or advisory agency to require the subdivider to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to obtain a comparable mobilehome or floating home, or a comparable available space, in a mobilehome park or floating home marina. The bill would also make conforming changes. By placing new requirements on local legislative bodies when approving the conversion of a mobilehome park or floating home marina, and by expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, prescribes various terms and conditions of tenancies in mobilehome parks. Existing law exempts a rental agreement in a mobilehome park that is in excess of 12 months' duration, and that meets other specified requirements, from local ordinances and initiative measures that establish a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent, commonly referred to as rent control. This bill would prohibit the above-described exemption from rent control in mobilehome parks for rental agreements from applying to a rental agreement entered into on or after February 13, 2020. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2025. The bill would declare that these provisions are severable. This bill would make related findings and declarations. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 35, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 16. Page 5451.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 11.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (August 13).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  15. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 20. Page 4755.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 2).

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (May 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 47 Yea · 16 Nay · 16 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2910012
Democratic 18004
Republican 0600
Total 4716016
% of votes cast 59%20%0%20%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Ting — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Burke — Yea
Weber — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chu — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Diep — Nay
Fong — Nay
Brough — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Salas — Not Voting
Gray — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Gloria — Not Voting
Maienschein — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Levine — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 28 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Unaffiliated 18900
Republican 0201
Total 281101
% of votes cast 70%28%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Galgiani — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Allen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Monning — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Beall — Yea
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Bates — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Borgeas — Nay
Chang — Nay
Glazer — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2200
Democratic 5000
Total 7200
% of votes cast 78%22%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Borgeas — Nay
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 20 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 19102
Unaffiliated 321306
Republican 0600
Total 512008
% of votes cast 65%25%0%10%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Smith — Yea
Weber — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Brough — Nay
Diep — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Burke — Nay
Salas — Nay
Fong — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Frazier — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Quirk — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Medina — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 7400
Republican 0100
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
McCarty — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Fong — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Diep — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2782 do?
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, requires the management of a mobilehome park to comply with notice and specified other requirements in order to terminate a tenancy in a mobilehome park due to a change of use of the mobilehome park, including giving homeowners at least 15 days' written notice that the management will be appearing before a local governmental board, commission, or body to request permits for the change of use. This bill would instead require the management to give homeowners at least 60 days' written notice that the management will be appearing before a local governmental board, commission, or body to obtain local approval for the intended change of use of the mobilehome park. Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a person or entity proposing a change in use of a mobilehome park to file a report on the impact of the conversion, closure, or cessation of use upon the displaced residents of the mobilehome park that includes, among other things, the availability of adequate replacement housing in mobilehome parks and relocation costs. Existing law requires the person proposing the change in use to provide the report to a resident of each mobilehome park at least 15 days before the hearing on the impact report by the advisory agency or legislative body. Existing law requires the legislative body or advisory agency to review the report before any change of use, and authorizes the legislative body or advisory agency, as a condition of the change of use, to require the person or entity to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to find adequate housing in a mobilehome park. This bill would, instead, require that report to include a replacement and relocation plan that adequately mitigates the impact on the ability of displaced residents of the mobilehome park to be converted or closed to find adequate housing in a mobilehome park. The bill would also require the person or entity proposing the change in use to pay for, and include in that report, an appraisal that determines, as specified, the in-place market value of a mobilehome of a displaced resident who cannot obtain adequate housing in another mobilehome park. The bill would require the person proposing the change in use to provide the report to a resident of each mobilehome in the mobilehome park at least 60 days before the hearing. The bill would require the legislative body or advisory agency, before approving the change of use, to review the report and any additional relevant documentation and to make a finding as to whether or not approval of the park closure and the park's conversion into its intended new use, taking into consideration both the impact report as a whole and the overall housing availability within the local jurisdiction, will result in or materially contribute to a shortage of housing opportunities and choices for low- and moderate-income households within the local jurisdiction. By placing new requirements on local legislative bodies when approving permits for a change of use for mobilehome parks, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the person or entity proposing the change in use to pay to a displaced resident unable to obtain adequate housing in another mobilehome park the in-place market value of the displaced resident's mobilehome. Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, requires an impact report to be filed at the time of filing a tentative or parcel map for a subdivision to be created from the conversion of a mobilehome park or floating home marina to another use that, among other things, addresses the availability of adequate replacement space in mobilehome parks or floating home marinas, and requires the subdivider to make the report available to each resident of the mobilehome park or floating home marina at least 15 days before the hearing on the map filing by the advisory agency or legislative body. Existing law authorizes a legislative body or advisory agency to require the subdivider to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to find adequate space in a mobilehome park or floating home marina. Under existing law, any violation of the Subdivision Map Act is a misdemeanor. This bill would, instead, require the report to meet requirements of the Planning and Zoning Law relating to the conversion of a mobilehome park to another use, as described above. The bill would also apply those requirements to conversion of a floating marina. The bill would require the legislative body or advisory agency to require the subdivider to take steps to mitigate any adverse impact on the ability of displaced residents to obtain a comparable mobilehome or floating home, or a comparable available space, in a mobilehome park or floating home marina. The bill would also make conforming changes. By placing new requirements on local legislative bodies when approving the conversion of a mobilehome park or floating home marina, and by expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, prescribes various terms and conditions of tenancies in mobilehome parks. Existing law exempts a rental agreement in a mobilehome park that is in excess of 12 months' duration, and that meets other specified requirements, from local ordinances and initiative measures that establish a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent, commonly referred to as rent control. This bill would prohibit the above-described exemption from rent control in mobilehome parks for rental agreements from applying to a rental agreement entered into on or after February 13, 2020. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2025. The bill would declare that these provisions are severable. This bill would make related findings and declarations. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Who sponsors AB 2782?
AB 2782 is sponsored by Umberg, Thomas J. (Democratic), Limón, Monique (Democratic), Voepel, and Mark Stone.
What is the current status of AB 2782?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2782?
Track AB 2782 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2782

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2782

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →