Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2069 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2069.
You're tracking AB 2069
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2069 — Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.
Last action — Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 requires securities offered or sold in this state in an issuer or nonissuer transaction to be qualified through an application filed with the Commissioner of Business Oversight, unless exempt from the qualification requirements. That law exempts, among other transactions, certain transactions not involving any public offering, as prescribed. That law also makes it unlawful, for a person in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, to engage in fraudulent or misleading acts or omissions. This bill would establish a new exemption from the qualification provisions for an offer or sale of any security for which the issuer is a California or foreign corporation that is not a "blind pool" company, as defined by the commisioner, not issuing fractional undivided interests in oil or gas rights or other similar mineral rights, is not an investment company subject to the federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and is not subject to certain reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The bill would require, among other criteria, that the offer or sale be conducted in accordance with certain requirements of federal law limiting the total offering of securities to $300,000 in a 12-month period, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as specified. Existing law authorizes all securities, whether eligible or not for qualification by coordination or notification, to be qualified by permit in accordance with certain provisions. Existing law authorizes an applicant to file a small company application for permit under these provisions if it meets specified conditions, including if the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock by the applicant to be sold in a 12-month period is limited to 1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as prescribed. This bill would increase the amount of that limit on the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock to $5,000,000, under the conditions described above. The bill would also place restrictions on the ability of applicants to participate in a class action or have a jury trial, and would place other related legal limits on applicants. Existing law provides that any person who violates a condition of qualification of the offer or sale of a security is liable to any person acquiring the security sold in violation, who may sue to recover the consideration paid for the security with interest thereon at the legal rate or for damages, as specified. This bill would provide for the recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill would authorize the award of treble damages against any person who violates those conditions of qualification by permit authorized by this bill if the court determines that the violation was willful. Existing law imposes liability on any person who engages in specified unlawful activity to the person who purchases a security from them or sells a security to them, and authorizes the purchaser or seller to sue either for rescission or for damages. The bill would require the court to award reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill also would authorize the court to award treble damages against a person who violates the above provision in an offer or sale of a security, as authorized by this bill, if the court determines the violation was willful.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/04/20 - Introduced Current pdf February 04, 2020
- AB2069 View text html
Action History
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Al Muratsuchi · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2069 do?
- The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 requires securities offered or sold in this state in an issuer or nonissuer transaction to be qualified through an application filed with the Commissioner of Business Oversight, unless exempt from the qualification requirements. That law exempts, among other transactions, certain transactions not involving any public offering, as prescribed. That law also makes it unlawful, for a person in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, to engage in fraudulent or misleading acts or omissions. This bill would establish a new exemption from the qualification provisions for an offer or sale of any security for which the issuer is a California or foreign corporation that is not a "blind pool" company, as defined by the commisioner, not issuing fractional undivided interests in oil or gas rights or other similar mineral rights, is not an investment company subject to the federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and is not subject to certain reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The bill would require, among other criteria, that the offer or sale be conducted in accordance with certain requirements of federal law limiting the total offering of securities to $300,000 in a 12-month period, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as specified. Existing law authorizes all securities, whether eligible or not for qualification by coordination or notification, to be qualified by permit in accordance with certain provisions. Existing law authorizes an applicant to file a small company application for permit under these provisions if it meets specified conditions, including if the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock by the applicant to be sold in a 12-month period is limited to 1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold, as prescribed. This bill would increase the amount of that limit on the total offering of voting common stock and preferred stock to $5,000,000, under the conditions described above. The bill would also place restrictions on the ability of applicants to participate in a class action or have a jury trial, and would place other related legal limits on applicants. Existing law provides that any person who violates a condition of qualification of the offer or sale of a security is liable to any person acquiring the security sold in violation, who may sue to recover the consideration paid for the security with interest thereon at the legal rate or for damages, as specified. This bill would provide for the recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill would authorize the award of treble damages against any person who violates those conditions of qualification by permit authorized by this bill if the court determines that the violation was willful. Existing law imposes liability on any person who engages in specified unlawful activity to the person who purchases a security from them or sells a security to them, and authorizes the purchaser or seller to sue either for rescission or for damages. The bill would require the court to award reasonable attorney's fees, as specified. The bill also would authorize the court to award treble damages against a person who violates the above provision in an offer or sale of a security, as authorized by this bill, if the court determines the violation was willful.
- Who sponsors AB 2069?
- AB 2069 is sponsored by Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2069?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2069?
- Track AB 2069 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2069
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2069
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →