Civil actions: pleadings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3323 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3323.
You're tracking AB 3323
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3323 — Civil actions: pleadings.
Last action — Read first time.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof for that allegation shall not be deemed material unless it has actually misled the adverse party to its prejudice in maintaining an action or defense upon the merits. Existing law provides that if it appears a party has been so misled, the court may order the pleading to be amended, upon such terms as may be just. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to this provision.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/21/20 - Introduced Current pdf February 21, 2020
- AB3323 View text html
Action History
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Jesse Gabriel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gabriel, Jesse Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3323 do?
- Existing law provides that variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof for that allegation shall not be deemed material unless it has actually misled the adverse party to its prejudice in maintaining an action or defense upon the merits. Existing law provides that if it appears a party has been so misled, the court may order the pleading to be amended, upon such terms as may be just. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to this provision.
- Who sponsors AB 3323?
- AB 3323 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 3323?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 3323?
- Track AB 3323 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3323
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3323
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →