California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 2691 — Dog training services and facilities: requirements.

Last action — Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes procedures, as administered by the State Department of Public Health, for the care and maintenance of pets boarded at a pet boarding facility, including, but not limited to, sanitation, provision of enrichment for the pet, health of the pet, and safety. Existing law similarly regulates the sale of dogs by pet breeders. This bill would establish parallel requirements for dog trainers, dog training facilities, and dog training facility operators, as defined. The bill would require a dog trainer to disclose in writing certain information to a purchaser of dog training services, including whether the trainer is licensed or certified by an animal training organization. The bill would require a trainer to maintain a written record on the health, status, and disposition of each dog trained at the training facility for a period of at least one year after the completion of training, and would specify various unlawful acts, such as failing to maintain facilities where the dogs are kept or trained in a sanitary condition and failing to wash hands before and after handling an infectious or contagious dog. A violation of those provisions would subject the trainer to civil fines, prohibition from engaging in the business of dog training, or both, as specified. The bill would impose requirements on a dog training facility operator related to the condition of the facility, including, but not limited to, ensuring that the interior building surfaces, including walls and floors, are constructed in a manner that permits them to be readily cleaned and sanitized, and maintaining an area for isolating sick dogs from healthy dogs. The bill would also require the facility operator to adhere to specified animal care requirements and to provide purchasers written information regarding the daily operations of the facility. The bill would authorize an animal control officer, humane officer, or peace officer who detects a violation of these provisions to issue a notice to correct to the dog training facility operator, specifying each violation and the required corrective action. A violation would constitute an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 for the first violation and by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for each subsequent violation, except that the bill would make a violation of the same provision within 5 years an infraction on the 2nd violation, and a misdemeanor on the 3rd or subsequent violation. The bill would provide that a dog training facility operator that causes or allows harm or injury, to a dog, or allows a dog to be subject to an unreasonable risk of harm or injury is guilty of a misdemeanor. By creating new crimes, and by increasing duties of local enforcement officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.

  2. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  3. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2691 do?
Existing law establishes procedures, as administered by the State Department of Public Health, for the care and maintenance of pets boarded at a pet boarding facility, including, but not limited to, sanitation, provision of enrichment for the pet, health of the pet, and safety. Existing law similarly regulates the sale of dogs by pet breeders. This bill would establish parallel requirements for dog trainers, dog training facilities, and dog training facility operators, as defined. The bill would require a dog trainer to disclose in writing certain information to a purchaser of dog training services, including whether the trainer is licensed or certified by an animal training organization. The bill would require a trainer to maintain a written record on the health, status, and disposition of each dog trained at the training facility for a period of at least one year after the completion of training, and would specify various unlawful acts, such as failing to maintain facilities where the dogs are kept or trained in a sanitary condition and failing to wash hands before and after handling an infectious or contagious dog. A violation of those provisions would subject the trainer to civil fines, prohibition from engaging in the business of dog training, or both, as specified. The bill would impose requirements on a dog training facility operator related to the condition of the facility, including, but not limited to, ensuring that the interior building surfaces, including walls and floors, are constructed in a manner that permits them to be readily cleaned and sanitized, and maintaining an area for isolating sick dogs from healthy dogs. The bill would also require the facility operator to adhere to specified animal care requirements and to provide purchasers written information regarding the daily operations of the facility. The bill would authorize an animal control officer, humane officer, or peace officer who detects a violation of these provisions to issue a notice to correct to the dog training facility operator, specifying each violation and the required corrective action. A violation would constitute an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $250 for the first violation and by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for each subsequent violation, except that the bill would make a violation of the same provision within 5 years an infraction on the 2nd violation, and a misdemeanor on the 3rd or subsequent violation. The bill would provide that a dog training facility operator that causes or allows harm or injury, to a dog, or allows a dog to be subject to an unreasonable risk of harm or injury is guilty of a misdemeanor. By creating new crimes, and by increasing duties of local enforcement officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 2691?
AB 2691 is sponsored by Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2691?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2691?
Track AB 2691 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2691

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2691

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →