Energy: appliance standards and State Water Project assessment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 49 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 49.
You're tracking SB 49
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 49 — Energy: appliance standards and State Water Project assessment.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 697, Statutes of 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 11 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Natural Resources Agency every 3 years to update the state's climate adaptation strategy to identify vulnerabilities to climate change by sector, including, among others, water and energy. Existing law requires the agency to annually report to the Legislature on actions taken by each applicable agency to implement the state's climate adaptation strategy. Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , at least every 2 years, to conduct assessments and forecasts of all aspects of energy industry supply, production, transportation, delivery and distribution, demand, and prices to develop and evaluate energy policies and programs that conserve resources, protect the environment, ensure energy reliability, enhance the state's economy, and protect public health and safety. Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System, known as the State Water Project, in accordance with the California Water Resources Development Bond Act to supply water to persons and entities in the state. This bill would require the Natural Resources Agency, in collaboration with the Energy Commission and the Department of Water Resources, to assess the opportunities and constraints for potential operational and structural upgrades to the State Water Project to aid California in achieving its climate and energy goals, and to provide associated recommendations consistent with specified purposes and California's energy goals. The bill would require that the assessment and recommendations include specified elements, including recommendations for state, federal, and other applicable funding sources, as specified. The bill would require that the assessment and recommendations be provided to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature before January 1, 2022. (2) Existing law authorizes the Energy Commission to prescribe, by regulation, energy efficiency standards, including appliance efficiency standards, to reduce the wasteful, uneconomic, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, including the energy associated with the use of water, as specified. This bill would require that those energy efficiency standards also manage energy loads to help maintain electrical grid reliability. The bill would require the Energy Commission to adopt, by regulation, and periodically update, standards for appliances to facilitate the deployment of flexible demand technologies, as specified, and would require that those standards be cost effective and prioritize appliances with specified attributes. The bill would require that the flexible demand appliance standards become effective no sooner than one year after the date of their adoption or updating. The bill would require the Energy Commission to consult with the Public Utilities Commission and load-serving entities to better align the flexible demand appliance standards with demand response programs administered by the state and load-serving entities and to incentivize flexible demand appliances. The bill would authorize the Energy Commission to establish an administrative enforcement process to enforce the flexible demand appliance standards with an administrative civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each violation, or to refer a violation to the Attorney General for an enforcement action in a court. The bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before January 1, 2021, and as necessary thereafter, to include as part of each integrated energy policy report a description of any actions it has taken relating to flexible demand appliance standards and the standards' cost to consumers.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/09/19 - Chaptered Current pdf October 09, 2019
- Enrolled 09/16/19 - Enrolled pdf September 16, 2019
- Amended 09/05/19 - Amended Assembly pdf September 05, 2019
- Amended 08/15/19 - Amended Assembly pdf August 15, 2019
- Amended 08/13/19 - Amended Assembly pdf August 13, 2019
- Amended 07/01/19 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2019
- Amended 05/07/19 - Amended Senate pdf May 07, 2019
- Amended 04/29/19 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2019
- Amended 04/11/19 - Amended Senate pdf April 11, 2019
- Amended 04/02/19 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2019
- Amended 03/11/19 - Amended Senate pdf March 11, 2019
- Introduced 12/03/18 - Introduced pdf December 03, 2018
- SB49 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 697, Statutes of 2019.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 2886.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 2873.)
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2808.) Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 60. Noes 15. Page 3312.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 4.) (August 30).
-
August 21 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Received at desk July 17 pursuant to JR 61(a)(10)).
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 10).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
-
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & E.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 1168.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 1088.) (May 16).
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
May 13 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 843.) (April 24).
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 650.) (April 10).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
Set for hearing April 10.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on E., U. & C. and EQ.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 3.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Skinner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Skinner
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 23% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 8% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 60 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 19% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 18% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 21% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 8% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 49 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the Natural Resources Agency every 3 years to update the state's climate adaptation strategy to identify vulnerabilities to climate change by sector, including, among others, water and energy. Existing law requires the agency to annually report to the Legislature on actions taken by each applicable agency to implement the state's climate adaptation strategy. Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , at least every 2 years, to conduct assessments and forecasts of all aspects of energy industry supply, production, transportation, delivery and distribution, demand, and prices to develop and evaluate energy policies and programs that conserve resources, protect the environment, ensure energy reliability, enhance the state's economy, and protect public health and safety. Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System, known as the State Water Project, in accordance with the California Water Resources Development Bond Act to supply water to persons and entities in the state. This bill would require the Natural Resources Agency, in collaboration with the Energy Commission and the Department of Water Resources, to assess the opportunities and constraints for potential operational and structural upgrades to the State Water Project to aid California in achieving its climate and energy goals, and to provide associated recommendations consistent with specified purposes and California's energy goals. The bill would require that the assessment and recommendations include specified elements, including recommendations for state, federal, and other applicable funding sources, as specified. The bill would require that the assessment and recommendations be provided to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature before January 1, 2022. (2) Existing law authorizes the Energy Commission to prescribe, by regulation, energy efficiency standards, including appliance efficiency standards, to reduce the wasteful, uneconomic, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, including the energy associated with the use of water, as specified. This bill would require that those energy efficiency standards also manage energy loads to help maintain electrical grid reliability. The bill would require the Energy Commission to adopt, by regulation, and periodically update, standards for appliances to facilitate the deployment of flexible demand technologies, as specified, and would require that those standards be cost effective and prioritize appliances with specified attributes. The bill would require that the flexible demand appliance standards become effective no sooner than one year after the date of their adoption or updating. The bill would require the Energy Commission to consult with the Public Utilities Commission and load-serving entities to better align the flexible demand appliance standards with demand response programs administered by the state and load-serving entities and to incentivize flexible demand appliances. The bill would authorize the Energy Commission to establish an administrative enforcement process to enforce the flexible demand appliance standards with an administrative civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each violation, or to refer a violation to the Attorney General for an enforcement action in a court. The bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before January 1, 2021, and as necessary thereafter, to include as part of each integrated energy policy report a description of any actions it has taken relating to flexible demand appliance standards and the standards' cost to consumers.
- Who sponsors SB 49?
- SB 49 is sponsored by Skinner.
- What is the current status of SB 49?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 49?
- Track SB 49 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 49
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 49
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →