California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 58 — Alcoholic beverages: hours of sale.

Last action — Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Santiago.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2022, and before January 2, 2027, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city that would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 3 a.m., upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hour without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to Cathedral City, Coachella, Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Palm Springs, Sacramento, San Francisco, and West Hollywood. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Santiago.

  2. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 29. Noes 35. Page 3615.)

  3. Ordered to third reading.

  4. Read third time and amended.

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (August 30).

  8. August 14 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  9. (Received at desk July 10 pursuant to JR 61(a)(10)).

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 6. Page 1181.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1088.) (May 16).

  16. Set for hearing May 16.

  17. April 22 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  18. Set for hearing April 22.

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4. Page 332.) (March 12).

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  23. Set for hearing March 12.

  24. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 17.

  27. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Scott D. Wiener · Primary
  • Santiago · Cosponsor
  • Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
  • Mayes · Cosponsor
  • Obernolte · Cosponsor
  • Wendy Carrillo · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 17 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (116)

116 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 116 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 58 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Santiago

Failed 29 Yea · 35 Nay · 15 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2220010
Democratic 61105
Republican 1400
Total 2935015
% of votes cast 37%44%0%19%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Fong — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Burke — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Salas — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Frazier — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Cooley — Nay
Smith — Nay
Gonzalez — Nay
Diep — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Rodriguez — Nay
Daly — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Levine — Nay
Melendez — Nay
McCarty — Nay
Cooper — Nay
Wood — Nay
Medina — Nay
O'Donnell — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mullin — Not Voting
Nazarian — Not Voting
Friedman — Not Voting
Brough — Not Voting
Kamlager-Dove — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Chau — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Nay
Berman, Marc Democratic Not Voting
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Nay
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Nay
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Nay
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Not Voting
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3101
Unaffiliated 10300
Total 13401
% of votes cast 72%22%0%6%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Fong — Yea
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Diep — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Nay
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5101
Unaffiliated 6303
Republican 0101
Total 11505
% of votes cast 52%24%0%24%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Low — Yea
Gray — Yea
Daly — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Salas — Nay
Cooley — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Cooper — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB58 Wiener et al.

Passed 29 Yea · 6 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5202
Unaffiliated 22401
Republican 2000
Total 29603
% of votes cast 76%16%0%8%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rubio — Nay
Bates — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Chang — Nay
Hueso — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Nay
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Nay
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 5100
% of votes cast 83%17%0%0%
How each member voted (6)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bates — Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 6000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (6)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 10 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8401
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 10402
% of votes cast 63%25%0%13%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Dodd — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Chang — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Hueso — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety taxation labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 58 do?
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2022, and before January 2, 2027, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city that would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 3 a.m., upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hour without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to Cathedral City, Coachella, Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Palm Springs, Sacramento, San Francisco, and West Hollywood. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.
Who sponsors SB 58?
SB 58 is sponsored by Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Santiago, Jones-Sawyer, Mayes, Obernolte, and Wendy Carrillo.
What is the current status of SB 58?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 58?
Track SB 58 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 58

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 58

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →