California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 1 D cosponsors

AB 699 — Credit services organizations.

Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Credit Services Act of 1984, defines and regulates the activities of credit services organizations. Existing law generally defines a credit services organization as a person who, for payment, performs specified credit-related services, such as improving a buyer's credit record and obtaining loans. Existing law requires credit services organizations to obtain a surety bond, as specified, before conducting business and requires that they register with the Attorney General, subject to a fee of $100. Among other things, existing law prohibits a credit services organization from receiving money before full and complete performance of the service the organization has agreed to perform and from failing to perform services agreed upon within 6 months. Existing law requires that credit services be provided pursuant to a written contract, which is required to contain specified statements, and, before the execution of a contract, a credit services organization must provide a prescribed information statement. Existing law requires the contract to contain a notice informing the buyer that the contract can be canceled within 5 days from the date the contract is signed. Existing law authorizes a buyer of services who is injured by a credit services organization's violation of the act, or its breach of contract, to bring an action for damages or injunctive relief, as specified. Existing law also authorizes any person, including a consumer credit reporting agency, to bring an action, as specified, for a violation of the act. This bill would instead require the Department of Business Oversight to register and regulate credit services organizations. The bill would replace the term "buyer" with the term "consumer" for purposes of describing a person utilizing the services of a credit services organization and would prescribe other definitions in this regard. The bill would require a credit services organization to provide a consumer an itemized monthly statement showing each service performed for a consumer, as specified, and would require the organization to perform services agreed upon within 180 days of contracting for those services. The bill would require the information statement and contract to inform the consumer that the contract can be canceled before midnight on the 5th working day after the consumer signs it. The bill would extend prohibitions on counseling a consumer to make untrue statements to other specified parties. Among other things, the bill would prohibit a credit services organization from impersonating a consumer, from failing to identify communications originating from the organization, from submitting a dispute to a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer more than 180 days after the disputed account has been removed, or from failing to provide along with its first written communication to a credit reporting agency or data furnisher sufficient information to investigate a dispute of an account. The bill would also require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit service organization to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. The bill would require a credit services organization to redact specified information in certain written communications. The bill would require a credit services organization to maintain certain information on file for 4 years. The bill would revise information that must be provided before a credit service contract is executed, including a notice regarding the filing of complaints with the Department of Business Oversight or the Attorney General, and would require the Department of Business Oversight to maintain an internet website for this purpose. The bill would revise statements that a credit services contract must include. The bill would prescribe statutory penalties that may be imposed on a credit services organization that willfully and knowingly violates the act. The bill would authorize the Department of Business Oversight to periodically increase the amount of the fee it is authorized to charge for registration of credit services organizations, but the amount of the fee would be prohibited from exceeding that which is reasonable and necessary to satisfy the department's costs in complying with its duties to regulate credit services organizations.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  2. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  3. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 3892.)

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (January 23).

  7. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  12. (pending re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P.)

  13. Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 3769.)

  14. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

  16. Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and P. & C.P.

  17. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 70 Yea · 0 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 45007
Democratic 21001
Republican 4002
Total 700010
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Levine — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fong — Not Voting
Brough — Not Voting
Rendon — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Smith — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Not Voting
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5000
Unaffiliated 10002
Republican 1000
Total 16002
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Fong — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 4000
Republican 0001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Kiley — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Smith — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4001
Democratic 5000
Republican 1001
Total 10002
% of votes cast 83%0%0%17%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Burke — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Weber — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 699 do?
Existing law, the Credit Services Act of 1984, defines and regulates the activities of credit services organizations. Existing law generally defines a credit services organization as a person who, for payment, performs specified credit-related services, such as improving a buyer's credit record and obtaining loans. Existing law requires credit services organizations to obtain a surety bond, as specified, before conducting business and requires that they register with the Attorney General, subject to a fee of $100. Among other things, existing law prohibits a credit services organization from receiving money before full and complete performance of the service the organization has agreed to perform and from failing to perform services agreed upon within 6 months. Existing law requires that credit services be provided pursuant to a written contract, which is required to contain specified statements, and, before the execution of a contract, a credit services organization must provide a prescribed information statement. Existing law requires the contract to contain a notice informing the buyer that the contract can be canceled within 5 days from the date the contract is signed. Existing law authorizes a buyer of services who is injured by a credit services organization's violation of the act, or its breach of contract, to bring an action for damages or injunctive relief, as specified. Existing law also authorizes any person, including a consumer credit reporting agency, to bring an action, as specified, for a violation of the act. This bill would instead require the Department of Business Oversight to register and regulate credit services organizations. The bill would replace the term "buyer" with the term "consumer" for purposes of describing a person utilizing the services of a credit services organization and would prescribe other definitions in this regard. The bill would require a credit services organization to provide a consumer an itemized monthly statement showing each service performed for a consumer, as specified, and would require the organization to perform services agreed upon within 180 days of contracting for those services. The bill would require the information statement and contract to inform the consumer that the contract can be canceled before midnight on the 5th working day after the consumer signs it. The bill would extend prohibitions on counseling a consumer to make untrue statements to other specified parties. Among other things, the bill would prohibit a credit services organization from impersonating a consumer, from failing to identify communications originating from the organization, from submitting a dispute to a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer more than 180 days after the disputed account has been removed, or from failing to provide along with its first written communication to a credit reporting agency or data furnisher sufficient information to investigate a dispute of an account. The bill would also require a consumer credit reporting agency, creditor, debt collector, or debt buyer that knows that a consumer is represented by a credit service organization to communicate with the credit services organization, except as specified. The bill would require a credit services organization to redact specified information in certain written communications. The bill would require a credit services organization to maintain certain information on file for 4 years. The bill would revise information that must be provided before a credit service contract is executed, including a notice regarding the filing of complaints with the Department of Business Oversight or the Attorney General, and would require the Department of Business Oversight to maintain an internet website for this purpose. The bill would revise statements that a credit services contract must include. The bill would prescribe statutory penalties that may be imposed on a credit services organization that willfully and knowingly violates the act. The bill would authorize the Department of Business Oversight to periodically increase the amount of the fee it is authorized to charge for registration of credit services organizations, but the amount of the fee would be prohibited from exceeding that which is reasonable and necessary to satisfy the department's costs in complying with its duties to regulate credit services organizations.
Who sponsors AB 699?
AB 699 is sponsored by Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 699?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 699?
Track AB 699 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 699

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 699

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →