California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 957 — Housing Omnibus.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 620, Statutes of 2019.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires each city, county, and city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan that contains certain mandatory elements, including a housing element. Existing law, until December 31, 2028, requires the housing element to contain, among other components, an inventory of land suitable for residential development, which includes, among other things, residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, including the airspace above sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county, as specified. This bill would instead provide that the inventory of land suitable for residential development, until December 31, 2028, includes, among other things, residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, including sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county, as specified. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) The State Housing Law requires the housing or building department or, if there is no building department, the health department, of every city or county or a specified environmental agency to enforce within its jurisdiction all of the State Housing Law, the building standards published in the California Building Standards Code, and other specified rules and regulations. If there is a violation of these provisions or any order or notice that gives a reasonable time to correct that violation, or if a nuisance exists, an enforcement agency is required, after 30 days' notice to abate the nuisance, to institute appropriate action or proceeding to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate the violation or nuisance. Existing law requires an enforcement agency to provide copies of specified notices of violations to tenants residing in a residential building, and requires an order or notice to repair or abate a violation that results in a substantial endangerment of the health and safety of residents or the public to include specified information and be posted in a conspicuous location on the property. Existing law authorizes the enforcement agency, a tenant, or a tenant association or organization to seek, and the court to order, the appointment of a receiver for the substandard building if the owner of a property with substandard conditions fails to comply within a reasonable time period with the terms of a specified order or notice to repair or abate a violation that results in a substantial endangerment of the health and safety of residents or the public. Existing law requires a petition to the court for the appointment of a receiver to include proof that notice of the petition was served not less than 3 days prior to filing the petition to all persons with a recorded interest in the real property upon which the substandard building exists. This bill would instead require the petition to include proof that notice of the petition was posted in a prominent place on the substandard building and mailed first-class mail to all persons with a recorded interest in the real property upon which the substandard building exists not less than 3 days prior to filing the petition, and would require the petition to be served on the owner, as specified. (3) Existing law establishes the Department of Housing and Community Development in the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law designates the department as the state agency responsible for administering funds received by the state from the federal Housing Trust Fund and requires the department to administer these funds through existing or newly created programs. Existing law requires the department to establish the Housing for a Healthy California Program to create supportive housing opportunities through grants to counties for capital and operating assistance, as specified, or operating reserve grants and capital loans to developers, or both. This bill would authorize the department to provide grants to counties for rental assistance in addition to capital and operating subsidies, and would make conforming changes. (4) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, authorizes a county to use grant funds for specified purposes, including on long-term rental assistance, and defines that term to mean a rental subsidy provided to a housing provider, including a developer leasing affordable housing to assist a tenant to pay the difference between 30% of the tenant's income and fair market rent as determined by the department. Existing law also authorizes a county to recover administrative costs of at least 5% of the total amount awarded. Existing law requires a county to award grants in compliance with federal Housing Trust Fund regulations. This bill would expand the definition of long-term rental assistance to include rental subsidies provided to supportive housing, private-market landlords, and sponsors master leasing private-market apartments, and would make conforming changes. The bill would also authorize a county to recover administrative costs of no more than 5% of the total grant awarded, unless the department approves a higher amount. The bill would limit the amount of long-term rental assistance a county may provide to no more than 2 times the fair market rent for the market area where the county is providing rental assistance. The bill would authorize a county to use program funds on incentives to landlords and would remove the requirement that a county award grants in compliance with federal Housing Trust Fund regulations. (5) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires the department to submit federal Housing Trust Fund allocation plans to the Department of Housing and Urban Development on August 31, 2018, and on or before August 31 for the subsequent 3 years. This bill would require the department to submit an allocation plan only in those years the department chooses to fund operating grants and loans to developers. (6) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires a county to agree to contribute funding for projects assisted through federal Housing Trust Fund grants in order to be eligible for a Housing for a Healthy California Program grant. This bill would remove that requirement in order to be eligible for a program grant. (7) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires the department to establish a ranking criteria to promote housing for persons meeting specified criteria, including those who are chronically homeless, are Medi-Cal beneficiaries, and those who are eligible for Supplemental Security Income. This bill would modify that ranking criteria by no longer requiring the criteria to include an individual that is eligible for Supplemental Security Income, and by requiring the criteria to include those who are eligible for Medi-Cal. (8) Existing law, the No Place Like Home Program (NPLH) , as ratified and amended by Proposition 2, as approved by the voters at the November 6, 2018, statewide general election, provides funding to provide permanent supportive housing, as defined, for the target population, which is defined to include individuals who have a serious mental disorder and who are homeless, chronically homeless, or at risk of chronic homelessness. Existing law makes the Department of Housing and Community Development the administrator of the NPLH and establishes the continuously appropriated No Place Like Home Fund for purposes of the NPLH. Existing law requires the department to develop a competitive application process for the purpose of awarding moneys pursuant to the NPLH, but also authorizes the department to establish an alternative process for allocating funds directly to counties with at least 5% of the state's homeless population and requires the department to adopt guidelines establishing the parameters of an alternative process, if it is established. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to amend Proposition 2 by a 23 vote, so long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act. Existing law authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority and the department to, among other things, enter into contracts to provide services pursuant to the program related to permanent supportive housing. Existing law authorizes the authority to issue taxable or tax-exempt revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000,000 for these purposes and to make secured or unsecured loans to the department in connection with financing permanent supportive housing pursuant to the program. The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) , an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, imposes a 1% tax on that portion of a taxpayer's taxable income that exceeds $1,000,000 and requires that the revenue from that tax be deposited in the Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. Existing law establishes the Supportive Housing Program Subaccount in the Mental Health Services Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the authority to provide funds to meet its financial obligations pursuant to any of the above-described service contracts. Under the NPLH, the state covenants, as specified, with the holders of any of the above-described bonds issued by the authority that it will not alter, amend, or restrict the above provisions relating to the subaccount, among other provisions, in any manner adverse to the interests of those bondholders so long as any of those bonds remain outstanding. This bill would additionally provide that the state covenants with the above-described bondholders that it will not alter, amend, or restrict provisions requiring the deposit of the revenues derived from the additional tax imposed under the MHSA into the Mental Health Services Fund in any manner adverse to the interests of those bondholders, as specified. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 620, Statutes of 2019.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3090.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2286.).

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From Consent Calendar.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  10. From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2).

  13. Referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1770.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  17. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 8).

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

  21. Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Housing and Community Development · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Housing and Community Development

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 52000
Democratic 22000
Republican 5000
Total 79000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chu — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Salas — Yea
Brough — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Weber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Levine — Yea
Wood — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26001
Democratic 10000
Republican 3000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Chang — Yea
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 5000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Moorlach — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bates — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 74 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 43005
Democratic 24001
Republican 7000
Total 74006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Burke — Not Voting
Friedman — Not Voting
Cooley — Not Voting
Ting — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7000
Unaffiliated 11000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 957 do?
(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires each city, county, and city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan that contains certain mandatory elements, including a housing element. Existing law, until December 31, 2028, requires the housing element to contain, among other components, an inventory of land suitable for residential development, which includes, among other things, residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, including the airspace above sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county, as specified. This bill would instead provide that the inventory of land suitable for residential development, until December 31, 2028, includes, among other things, residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, including sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county, as specified. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) The State Housing Law requires the housing or building department or, if there is no building department, the health department, of every city or county or a specified environmental agency to enforce within its jurisdiction all of the State Housing Law, the building standards published in the California Building Standards Code, and other specified rules and regulations. If there is a violation of these provisions or any order or notice that gives a reasonable time to correct that violation, or if a nuisance exists, an enforcement agency is required, after 30 days' notice to abate the nuisance, to institute appropriate action or proceeding to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate the violation or nuisance. Existing law requires an enforcement agency to provide copies of specified notices of violations to tenants residing in a residential building, and requires an order or notice to repair or abate a violation that results in a substantial endangerment of the health and safety of residents or the public to include specified information and be posted in a conspicuous location on the property. Existing law authorizes the enforcement agency, a tenant, or a tenant association or organization to seek, and the court to order, the appointment of a receiver for the substandard building if the owner of a property with substandard conditions fails to comply within a reasonable time period with the terms of a specified order or notice to repair or abate a violation that results in a substantial endangerment of the health and safety of residents or the public. Existing law requires a petition to the court for the appointment of a receiver to include proof that notice of the petition was served not less than 3 days prior to filing the petition to all persons with a recorded interest in the real property upon which the substandard building exists. This bill would instead require the petition to include proof that notice of the petition was posted in a prominent place on the substandard building and mailed first-class mail to all persons with a recorded interest in the real property upon which the substandard building exists not less than 3 days prior to filing the petition, and would require the petition to be served on the owner, as specified. (3) Existing law establishes the Department of Housing and Community Development in the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law designates the department as the state agency responsible for administering funds received by the state from the federal Housing Trust Fund and requires the department to administer these funds through existing or newly created programs. Existing law requires the department to establish the Housing for a Healthy California Program to create supportive housing opportunities through grants to counties for capital and operating assistance, as specified, or operating reserve grants and capital loans to developers, or both. This bill would authorize the department to provide grants to counties for rental assistance in addition to capital and operating subsidies, and would make conforming changes. (4) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, authorizes a county to use grant funds for specified purposes, including on long-term rental assistance, and defines that term to mean a rental subsidy provided to a housing provider, including a developer leasing affordable housing to assist a tenant to pay the difference between 30% of the tenant's income and fair market rent as determined by the department. Existing law also authorizes a county to recover administrative costs of at least 5% of the total amount awarded. Existing law requires a county to award grants in compliance with federal Housing Trust Fund regulations. This bill would expand the definition of long-term rental assistance to include rental subsidies provided to supportive housing, private-market landlords, and sponsors master leasing private-market apartments, and would make conforming changes. The bill would also authorize a county to recover administrative costs of no more than 5% of the total grant awarded, unless the department approves a higher amount. The bill would limit the amount of long-term rental assistance a county may provide to no more than 2 times the fair market rent for the market area where the county is providing rental assistance. The bill would authorize a county to use program funds on incentives to landlords and would remove the requirement that a county award grants in compliance with federal Housing Trust Fund regulations. (5) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires the department to submit federal Housing Trust Fund allocation plans to the Department of Housing and Urban Development on August 31, 2018, and on or before August 31 for the subsequent 3 years. This bill would require the department to submit an allocation plan only in those years the department chooses to fund operating grants and loans to developers. (6) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires a county to agree to contribute funding for projects assisted through federal Housing Trust Fund grants in order to be eligible for a Housing for a Healthy California Program grant. This bill would remove that requirement in order to be eligible for a program grant. (7) Existing law, for purposes of the Housing for a Healthy California Program, requires the department to establish a ranking criteria to promote housing for persons meeting specified criteria, including those who are chronically homeless, are Medi-Cal beneficiaries, and those who are eligible for Supplemental Security Income. This bill would modify that ranking criteria by no longer requiring the criteria to include an individual that is eligible for Supplemental Security Income, and by requiring the criteria to include those who are eligible for Medi-Cal. (8) Existing law, the No Place Like Home Program (NPLH) , as ratified and amended by Proposition 2, as approved by the voters at the November 6, 2018, statewide general election, provides funding to provide permanent supportive housing, as defined, for the target population, which is defined to include individuals who have a serious mental disorder and who are homeless, chronically homeless, or at risk of chronic homelessness. Existing law makes the Department of Housing and Community Development the administrator of the NPLH and establishes the continuously appropriated No Place Like Home Fund for purposes of the NPLH. Existing law requires the department to develop a competitive application process for the purpose of awarding moneys pursuant to the NPLH, but also authorizes the department to establish an alternative process for allocating funds directly to counties with at least 5% of the state's homeless population and requires the department to adopt guidelines establishing the parameters of an alternative process, if it is established. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to amend Proposition 2 by a 23 vote, so long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act. Existing law authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority and the department to, among other things, enter into contracts to provide services pursuant to the program related to permanent supportive housing. Existing law authorizes the authority to issue taxable or tax-exempt revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000,000 for these purposes and to make secured or unsecured loans to the department in connection with financing permanent supportive housing pursuant to the program. The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) , an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, imposes a 1% tax on that portion of a taxpayer's taxable income that exceeds $1,000,000 and requires that the revenue from that tax be deposited in the Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. Existing law establishes the Supportive Housing Program Subaccount in the Mental Health Services Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the authority to provide funds to meet its financial obligations pursuant to any of the above-described service contracts. Under the NPLH, the state covenants, as specified, with the holders of any of the above-described bonds issued by the authority that it will not alter, amend, or restrict the above provisions relating to the subaccount, among other provisions, in any manner adverse to the interests of those bondholders so long as any of those bonds remain outstanding. This bill would additionally provide that the state covenants with the above-described bondholders that it will not alter, amend, or restrict provisions requiring the deposit of the revenues derived from the additional tax imposed under the MHSA into the Mental Health Services Fund in any manner adverse to the interests of those bondholders, as specified. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 957?
AB 957 is sponsored by Committee on Housing and Community Development.
What is the current status of AB 957?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 957?
Track AB 957 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 957

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 957

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →