Telecommunications service: backup electrical supply rules.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 431 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 431.
You're tracking SB 431
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 431 — Telecommunications service: backup electrical supply rules.
Last action — August 20 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations. Existing law requires the commission to develop and implement performance reliability standards for backup power systems installed on the property of residential and small commercial customers by a facilities-based provider of telephony services upon determining that the benefits of the standards exceed the costs. This bill would require the commission, in consultation with the Office of Emergency Services and the telecommunications industry, by July 1, 2021, to develop and implement backup electrical supply rules, as specified, for telecommunications service, as defined, that is provided within a commission-designated Tier 2 or Tier 3 High Fire Threat District. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of a commission action implementing the bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/27/20 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 27, 2020
- Amended 02/10/20 - Amended Assembly pdf February 10, 2020
- Amended 06/12/19 - Amended Assembly pdf June 12, 2019
- Introduced 02/21/19 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2019
- SB431 View text html
Action History
-
August 20 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
August 18 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
August 11 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (August 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
July 28 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
-
July 14 hearing postponed by committee.
-
(Corrected February 11).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
-
June 19 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on C. & C. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 3. Page 922.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 771.) (April 23).
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Glazer · Cosponsor
- Mike McGuire · Primary
- Henry I. Stern · Cosponsor
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Anna M. Caballero · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Wieckowski · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Bauer-Kahan · Cosponsor
- Levine · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Lena A. Gonzalez · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
- Susan Rubio · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 105 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- McGuire, Mike Democratic
Co-sponsors (16)
- Glazer
- Stern, Henry I. Democratic
- Beall
- Caballero, Anna M. Democratic
- Dodd
- Hill
- Monning
- Nielsen
- Wieckowski
- Wilk
- Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic
- Levine
- Wood
- Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic
- Dahle, Megan Republican
- Rubio, Susan Democratic
Not signed on (105)
105 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 105 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 15% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Low | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 8% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 431 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations. Existing law requires the commission to develop and implement performance reliability standards for backup power systems installed on the property of residential and small commercial customers by a facilities-based provider of telephony services upon determining that the benefits of the standards exceed the costs. This bill would require the commission, in consultation with the Office of Emergency Services and the telecommunications industry, by July 1, 2021, to develop and implement backup electrical supply rules, as specified, for telecommunications service, as defined, that is provided within a commission-designated Tier 2 or Tier 3 High Fire Threat District. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of a commission action implementing the bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 431?
- SB 431 is sponsored by Glazer, McGuire, Mike (Democratic), Stern, Henry I. (Democratic), Beall, Caballero, Anna M. (Democratic), Dodd, Hill, Monning, Nielsen, Wieckowski, Wilk, Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca (Democratic), Levine, Wood, Gonzalez, Lena A. (Democratic), Dahle, Megan (Republican), and Rubio, Susan (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 431?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 431?
- Track SB 431 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 431
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 431
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →