Property taxation: valuation: certificated aircraft.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 791 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 791.
You're tracking SB 791
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 791 — Property taxation: valuation: certificated aircraft.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 333, Statutes of 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the personal property of an air carrier to be taxed at its fair market value, and the California Constitution requires property subject to ad valorem property taxation to be assessed in the county in which it is situated. Existing property tax law, for the 2005–06 fiscal year to the 2016–17 fiscal year, inclusive, specified a formula to determine the preallocated fair market value of certificated aircraft of a commercial air carrier. Existing property tax law provides an allocation formula to be used by each assessor that is generally based on the proportionate amount of time that certificated aircraft spend within the state and within each county during a representative period designated by the State Board of Equalization, as provided. This bill would specify that this allocation formula applies only to fiscal years before the 2020–21 fiscal year and repeals the requirement that the State Board of Equalization designate a representative period. The bill, for the 2020–21 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, would establish a new formula for allocating the taxable value of certificated aircraft based on the time spent in the state in the previous calendar year, with appropriate adjustments for time spent in maintenance in this state. The bill would require the board, after consultation with the California Assessors' Association and representatives of commercial air carriers, to promulgate emergency regulations and produce forms and instructions necessary to implement the allocation formula established by the bill. Previously existing law, until December 31, 2016, required the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to designate, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft in this state in an assessment year, and required the lead county assessor to calculate, based on the above-described statutory formula, the value of the air carrier's personal property and to transmit these calculations to other county assessors, but specified that each county assessor was responsible for assessing and enrolling the taxable value of the property in the assessor's county, as provided. Previously existing law, until December 31, 2016, also required the lead county assessor's office to lead a team to audit the books and records of commercial air carriers, and also required a commercial air carrier that received a notice of the designation of a lead county assessor's office to file one signed property statement with the lead county assessor's office for its personal property at all airport locations and fixtures at all airport locations. This bill would require the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessor's Association, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, on or before March 1, 2020, and on or before each March 1 thereafter, to designate a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft. The bill would also require the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessor's Association, every 3rd year thereafter, to redesignate a lead county assessor's office for these air carriers. The bill, similar to the above-described provisions, would require the lead county assessor's office to, among other things, calculate the unallocated value of the certificated aircraft of each commercial air carrier to which that assessor is designated and transmit these calculations to other county assessors, as provided, and lead a team to audit the commercial air carriers. The bill would reenact the above-described provisions requiring a commercial air carrier to file one property statement with the lead county assessor's office. By adding to the duties of an assessor designated as a lead county assessor for purposes of certificated aircraft valuation for property taxation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/20/19 - Chaptered Current pdf September 20, 2019
- Enrolled 09/11/19 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2019
- Introduced 03/21/19 - Introduced pdf March 21, 2019
- SB791 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 333, Statutes of 2019.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3175.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 30).
-
August 14 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
July 1 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1282.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1109.) (May 16).
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
May 6 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 847.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Governance and Finance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Governance and Finance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 791 do?
- Existing property tax law requires the personal property of an air carrier to be taxed at its fair market value, and the California Constitution requires property subject to ad valorem property taxation to be assessed in the county in which it is situated. Existing property tax law, for the 2005–06 fiscal year to the 2016–17 fiscal year, inclusive, specified a formula to determine the preallocated fair market value of certificated aircraft of a commercial air carrier. Existing property tax law provides an allocation formula to be used by each assessor that is generally based on the proportionate amount of time that certificated aircraft spend within the state and within each county during a representative period designated by the State Board of Equalization, as provided. This bill would specify that this allocation formula applies only to fiscal years before the 2020–21 fiscal year and repeals the requirement that the State Board of Equalization designate a representative period. The bill, for the 2020–21 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, would establish a new formula for allocating the taxable value of certificated aircraft based on the time spent in the state in the previous calendar year, with appropriate adjustments for time spent in maintenance in this state. The bill would require the board, after consultation with the California Assessors' Association and representatives of commercial air carriers, to promulgate emergency regulations and produce forms and instructions necessary to implement the allocation formula established by the bill. Previously existing law, until December 31, 2016, required the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to designate, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft in this state in an assessment year, and required the lead county assessor to calculate, based on the above-described statutory formula, the value of the air carrier's personal property and to transmit these calculations to other county assessors, but specified that each county assessor was responsible for assessing and enrolling the taxable value of the property in the assessor's county, as provided. Previously existing law, until December 31, 2016, also required the lead county assessor's office to lead a team to audit the books and records of commercial air carriers, and also required a commercial air carrier that received a notice of the designation of a lead county assessor's office to file one signed property statement with the lead county assessor's office for its personal property at all airport locations and fixtures at all airport locations. This bill would require the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessor's Association, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, on or before March 1, 2020, and on or before each March 1 thereafter, to designate a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft. The bill would also require the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessor's Association, every 3rd year thereafter, to redesignate a lead county assessor's office for these air carriers. The bill, similar to the above-described provisions, would require the lead county assessor's office to, among other things, calculate the unallocated value of the certificated aircraft of each commercial air carrier to which that assessor is designated and transmit these calculations to other county assessors, as provided, and lead a team to audit the commercial air carriers. The bill would reenact the above-described provisions requiring a commercial air carrier to file one property statement with the lead county assessor's office. By adding to the duties of an assessor designated as a lead county assessor for purposes of certificated aircraft valuation for property taxation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 791?
- SB 791 is sponsored by Committee on Governance and Finance.
- What is the current status of SB 791?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 791?
- Track SB 791 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 791
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 791
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →