Health care service plans and health insurance: third-party payments.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 290 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 290.
You're tracking AB 290
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 290 — Health care service plans and health insurance: third-party payments.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 862, Statutes of 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. These provisions govern, among other things, procedures by health care service plans and insurers with respect to premium payments. This bill would require a health care service plan or an insurer that provides a policy of health insurance to accept payments from specified third-party entities, including an Indian tribe or a local, state, or federal government program. The bill would also require a financially interested entity, as defined, other than those entities, that is making a third-party premium payment to provide that assistance in a specified manner and to perform other related duties, including disclosing to the plan or the insurer the name of the enrollee or insured, as applicable, for each plan or policy on whose behalf a third-party premium payment will be made. The bill would require each plan or insurer to provide to the appropriate department information regarding premium payments by financially interested entities and reimbursement for services to providers, and would set forth standards governing the reimbursement of financially interested providers, including, but not limited to, chronic dialysis clinics, that meet certain criteria. Commencing January 1, 2022, the bill would require reimbursement to contracted providers to be the higher of the Medicare reimbursement rate or the rate determined pursuant to an independent dispute resolution process, as established by the bill, if either party seeks a rate determination pursuant to that process, and would require reimbursement for noncontracted providers to be governed by the terms and conditions of the health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, or the rate determined pursuant to the dispute resolution process, as prescribed. The reimbursement rates and dispute resolution process established by the bill would not apply to reimbursement for an enrollee or insured on behalf of whom a financially interested provider was already making premium payments to a health care service plan or insurer on or before October 1, 2019, except under specified circumstances. The bill would not alter existing obligations and requirements applicable to a health care service plan or health insurer relating to offering, marketing, selling, and issuing a health benefit plan, and cancellation or nonrenewal, as specified. The bill would specify that its requirements do not supersede or modify any privacy and information security requirements and protections in federal and state law regarding protected health information or personally identifiable information. The bill would declare that an enrollee's or insured's loss of coverage due to a financially interested entity's failure to pay premiums on a timely basis would be deemed a triggering event to allow for special enrollment, requiring a health care service plan or health insurer to allow an individual to enroll in or change individual health benefit plans, as specified. Existing law establishes requirements for the licensure and regulation of clinics by the State Department of Public Health, which include certain types of specialty clinics, such as chronic dialysis clinics, as defined. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would prohibit a chronic dialysis clinic from steering, directing, or advising a patient regarding any specific coverage program option or health care service plan contract. The bill would require a chronic dialysis clinic to post a notice requiring questions about Medicare coverage for patients with end stage renal disease to be directed to the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program, as specified. This bill would make certain of its provisions operative, for specified financially interested entities, on July 1, 2020, or upon a finding by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General that compliance by the financially interested entities with those provisions does not violate federal law, as specified. By expanding the requirements applicable to chronic dialysis clinics, and because a willful violation of certain of the bill's requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/13/19 - Chaptered Current pdf October 13, 2019
- Enrolled 09/13/19 - Enrolled pdf September 13, 2019
- Amended 09/05/19 - Amended Senate pdf September 05, 2019
- Amended 07/10/19 - Amended Senate pdf July 10, 2019
- Amended 06/25/19 - Amended Senate pdf June 25, 2019
- Amended 05/17/19 - Amended Assembly pdf May 17, 2019
- Amended 03/05/19 - Amended Assembly pdf March 05, 2019
- Introduced 01/28/19 - Introduced pdf January 28, 2019
- AB290 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 862, Statutes of 2019.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 20. Page 3268.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3252.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 2679.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (July 3).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 15. Page 1801.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 16).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Wood · Primary
- Leyva · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wood
Co-sponsors (1)
- Leyva
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 15 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 16 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 47 | 20 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 25% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 13 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 33% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 15 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 46 | 15 | 0 | 19 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 19% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 290 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. These provisions govern, among other things, procedures by health care service plans and insurers with respect to premium payments. This bill would require a health care service plan or an insurer that provides a policy of health insurance to accept payments from specified third-party entities, including an Indian tribe or a local, state, or federal government program. The bill would also require a financially interested entity, as defined, other than those entities, that is making a third-party premium payment to provide that assistance in a specified manner and to perform other related duties, including disclosing to the plan or the insurer the name of the enrollee or insured, as applicable, for each plan or policy on whose behalf a third-party premium payment will be made. The bill would require each plan or insurer to provide to the appropriate department information regarding premium payments by financially interested entities and reimbursement for services to providers, and would set forth standards governing the reimbursement of financially interested providers, including, but not limited to, chronic dialysis clinics, that meet certain criteria. Commencing January 1, 2022, the bill would require reimbursement to contracted providers to be the higher of the Medicare reimbursement rate or the rate determined pursuant to an independent dispute resolution process, as established by the bill, if either party seeks a rate determination pursuant to that process, and would require reimbursement for noncontracted providers to be governed by the terms and conditions of the health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, or the rate determined pursuant to the dispute resolution process, as prescribed. The reimbursement rates and dispute resolution process established by the bill would not apply to reimbursement for an enrollee or insured on behalf of whom a financially interested provider was already making premium payments to a health care service plan or insurer on or before October 1, 2019, except under specified circumstances. The bill would not alter existing obligations and requirements applicable to a health care service plan or health insurer relating to offering, marketing, selling, and issuing a health benefit plan, and cancellation or nonrenewal, as specified. The bill would specify that its requirements do not supersede or modify any privacy and information security requirements and protections in federal and state law regarding protected health information or personally identifiable information. The bill would declare that an enrollee's or insured's loss of coverage due to a financially interested entity's failure to pay premiums on a timely basis would be deemed a triggering event to allow for special enrollment, requiring a health care service plan or health insurer to allow an individual to enroll in or change individual health benefit plans, as specified. Existing law establishes requirements for the licensure and regulation of clinics by the State Department of Public Health, which include certain types of specialty clinics, such as chronic dialysis clinics, as defined. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would prohibit a chronic dialysis clinic from steering, directing, or advising a patient regarding any specific coverage program option or health care service plan contract. The bill would require a chronic dialysis clinic to post a notice requiring questions about Medicare coverage for patients with end stage renal disease to be directed to the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program, as specified. This bill would make certain of its provisions operative, for specified financially interested entities, on July 1, 2020, or upon a finding by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General that compliance by the financially interested entities with those provisions does not violate federal law, as specified. By expanding the requirements applicable to chronic dialysis clinics, and because a willful violation of certain of the bill's requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 290?
- AB 290 is sponsored by Wood and Leyva.
- What is the current status of AB 290?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 290?
- Track AB 290 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 290
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 290
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →