California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 290 — Health care service plans and health insurance: third-party payments.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 862, Statutes of 2019.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. These provisions govern, among other things, procedures by health care service plans and insurers with respect to premium payments. This bill would require a health care service plan or an insurer that provides a policy of health insurance to accept payments from specified third-party entities, including an Indian tribe or a local, state, or federal government program. The bill would also require a financially interested entity, as defined, other than those entities, that is making a third-party premium payment to provide that assistance in a specified manner and to perform other related duties, including disclosing to the plan or the insurer the name of the enrollee or insured, as applicable, for each plan or policy on whose behalf a third-party premium payment will be made. The bill would require each plan or insurer to provide to the appropriate department information regarding premium payments by financially interested entities and reimbursement for services to providers, and would set forth standards governing the reimbursement of financially interested providers, including, but not limited to, chronic dialysis clinics, that meet certain criteria. Commencing January 1, 2022, the bill would require reimbursement to contracted providers to be the higher of the Medicare reimbursement rate or the rate determined pursuant to an independent dispute resolution process, as established by the bill, if either party seeks a rate determination pursuant to that process, and would require reimbursement for noncontracted providers to be governed by the terms and conditions of the health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, or the rate determined pursuant to the dispute resolution process, as prescribed. The reimbursement rates and dispute resolution process established by the bill would not apply to reimbursement for an enrollee or insured on behalf of whom a financially interested provider was already making premium payments to a health care service plan or insurer on or before October 1, 2019, except under specified circumstances. The bill would not alter existing obligations and requirements applicable to a health care service plan or health insurer relating to offering, marketing, selling, and issuing a health benefit plan, and cancellation or nonrenewal, as specified. The bill would specify that its requirements do not supersede or modify any privacy and information security requirements and protections in federal and state law regarding protected health information or personally identifiable information. The bill would declare that an enrollee's or insured's loss of coverage due to a financially interested entity's failure to pay premiums on a timely basis would be deemed a triggering event to allow for special enrollment, requiring a health care service plan or health insurer to allow an individual to enroll in or change individual health benefit plans, as specified. Existing law establishes requirements for the licensure and regulation of clinics by the State Department of Public Health, which include certain types of specialty clinics, such as chronic dialysis clinics, as defined. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would prohibit a chronic dialysis clinic from steering, directing, or advising a patient regarding any specific coverage program option or health care service plan contract. The bill would require a chronic dialysis clinic to post a notice requiring questions about Medicare coverage for patients with end stage renal disease to be directed to the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program, as specified. This bill would make certain of its provisions operative, for specified financially interested entities, on July 1, 2020, or upon a finding by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General that compliance by the financially interested entities with those provisions does not violate federal law, as specified. By expanding the requirements applicable to chronic dialysis clinics, and because a willful violation of certain of the bill's requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 862, Statutes of 2019.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 20. Page 3268.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3252.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 2679.).

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).

  10. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (July 3).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  14. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 15. Page 1801.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  19. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 16).

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wood · Primary
  • Leyva · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wood

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Leyva

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 47 Yea · 20 Nay · 12 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 311506
Democratic 16303
Republican 0203
Total 4720012
% of votes cast 59%25%0%15%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Holden — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Fong — Nay
Brough — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Frazier — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Diep — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Gray — Nay
Daly — Nay
Medina — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Burke — Not Voting
Nazarian — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Maienschein — Not Voting
Chau — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 13 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7102
Unaffiliated 131004
Republican 1200
Total 211306
% of votes cast 53%33%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Pan — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Borgeas — Nay
Galgiani — Nay
Bates — Nay
Hill — Nay
Glazer — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Chang — Nay
Dodd — Not Voting
Rubio — Not Voting
Roth — Not Voting
Hueso — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Not Voting
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4100
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bates — Nay
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 5 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1100
Unaffiliated 4101
Republican 0100
Total 5301
% of votes cast 56%33%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Rubio — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 46 Yea · 15 Nay · 19 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 308010
Democratic 15307
Republican 1402
Total 4615019
% of votes cast 58%19%0%24%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Holden — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Levine — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Brough — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Medina — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Daly — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Cooley — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Diep — Not Voting
Gray — Not Voting
Maienschein — Not Voting
Kamlager-Dove — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Waldron — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Not Voting
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Not Voting
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5101
Unaffiliated 7202
Total 12303
% of votes cast 67%17%0%17%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Brough — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Maienschein — Not Voting
Diep — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7101
Democratic 4100
Republican 0001
Total 11202
% of votes cast 73%13%0%13%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Burke — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Chu — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Waldron — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 290 do?
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. These provisions govern, among other things, procedures by health care service plans and insurers with respect to premium payments. This bill would require a health care service plan or an insurer that provides a policy of health insurance to accept payments from specified third-party entities, including an Indian tribe or a local, state, or federal government program. The bill would also require a financially interested entity, as defined, other than those entities, that is making a third-party premium payment to provide that assistance in a specified manner and to perform other related duties, including disclosing to the plan or the insurer the name of the enrollee or insured, as applicable, for each plan or policy on whose behalf a third-party premium payment will be made. The bill would require each plan or insurer to provide to the appropriate department information regarding premium payments by financially interested entities and reimbursement for services to providers, and would set forth standards governing the reimbursement of financially interested providers, including, but not limited to, chronic dialysis clinics, that meet certain criteria. Commencing January 1, 2022, the bill would require reimbursement to contracted providers to be the higher of the Medicare reimbursement rate or the rate determined pursuant to an independent dispute resolution process, as established by the bill, if either party seeks a rate determination pursuant to that process, and would require reimbursement for noncontracted providers to be governed by the terms and conditions of the health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, or the rate determined pursuant to the dispute resolution process, as prescribed. The reimbursement rates and dispute resolution process established by the bill would not apply to reimbursement for an enrollee or insured on behalf of whom a financially interested provider was already making premium payments to a health care service plan or insurer on or before October 1, 2019, except under specified circumstances. The bill would not alter existing obligations and requirements applicable to a health care service plan or health insurer relating to offering, marketing, selling, and issuing a health benefit plan, and cancellation or nonrenewal, as specified. The bill would specify that its requirements do not supersede or modify any privacy and information security requirements and protections in federal and state law regarding protected health information or personally identifiable information. The bill would declare that an enrollee's or insured's loss of coverage due to a financially interested entity's failure to pay premiums on a timely basis would be deemed a triggering event to allow for special enrollment, requiring a health care service plan or health insurer to allow an individual to enroll in or change individual health benefit plans, as specified. Existing law establishes requirements for the licensure and regulation of clinics by the State Department of Public Health, which include certain types of specialty clinics, such as chronic dialysis clinics, as defined. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would prohibit a chronic dialysis clinic from steering, directing, or advising a patient regarding any specific coverage program option or health care service plan contract. The bill would require a chronic dialysis clinic to post a notice requiring questions about Medicare coverage for patients with end stage renal disease to be directed to the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program, as specified. This bill would make certain of its provisions operative, for specified financially interested entities, on July 1, 2020, or upon a finding by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General that compliance by the financially interested entities with those provisions does not violate federal law, as specified. By expanding the requirements applicable to chronic dialysis clinics, and because a willful violation of certain of the bill's requirements by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 290?
AB 290 is sponsored by Wood and Leyva.
What is the current status of AB 290?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 290?
Track AB 290 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 290

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 290

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →