California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 819 — Foster care.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 777, Statutes of 2019.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, commonly known as Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) , states the intent of the Legislature to improve California's child welfare system and its outcomes by increasing the use of home-based family care and creating faster paths to permanency resulting in shorter durations of involvement in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, among other things. Existing law, as part of the CCR, requires the State Department of Social Services to implement a resource family approval process, and directs counties and foster family agencies, commencing January 1, 2017, to approve resource families in lieu of licensing and certifying foster homes. Existing law defines a resource family as an individual or family that has successfully met both home environment assessment standards and permanency assessment criteria. Existing law requires the department to review resource family approval standards, including case file documentation. Existing law requires foster family agencies to prepare a written report on an applicant's capacity to foster, adopt, and provide legal guardianship of a child based on information gathered through the resource family application and assessment processes, and requires counties and foster family agencies, when a resource family seeks approval by a subsequent foster family agency or transfer of their approval to a county, to request or provide the above-specified written report, including any updates to the report. This bill would require counties and foster family agencies, when a resource family seeks approval by a subsequent foster family agency or transfer of their approval to a county, to request or provide documents in the resource family file maintained by a county or the resource family case record maintained by a foster family agency, including any updates to the file or record. By imposing additional duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the department to license and regulate various facilities, including community care facilities, residential care facilities for persons with chronic, life-threatening illness, child daycare centers, family childcare homes, and licensed foster family homes or certified family homes, and generally makes violations of these requirements a crime. Existing law requires the department to secure from an appropriate law enforcement agency a criminal record to determine whether an applicant or specified persons have been convicted of a crime, and prohibits the department from approving applicants who have committed specified crimes. Existing law authorizes the department to prohibit a person from being a member of the board of directors, an executive director, or an officer of one of the above-specified facilities if they, among other things, have engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either the people of the state or an individual in or receiving services from the facility or have engaged in acts of financial malfeasance concerning the operation of the facility. Existing law generally prohibits an excluded person from working in a facility or being licensed to operate any facility licensed by the department or from being a certified foster parent or resource family for the remainder of the excluded person's life if the excluded person appealed the exclusion order and there is a decision and order of the department upholding the exclusion order. This bill would state that an excluded person is prohibited from being a resource family. The bill would impose specified criminal background check requirements on individuals who work in a community care facility that is eligible to accept placement of a dependent child. By expanding the requirements on those facilities, the violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law authorizes specified caregivers who are not licensed health care professionals to administer subcutaneous injections of medications to a foster child in placement, as prescribed by the child's physician. This bill would additionally authorize a staff member of a group home who provides direct care and supervision to children and youth residing in the group home to administer those injections to a foster child in placement. (4) Existing law requires the department to establish rates for short-term residential therapeutic programs and foster family agencies that include an interim rate that is effective January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, inclusive, and that becomes inoperative on January 1, 2020. This bill would instead make that interim rate effective January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020, inclusive, and would make it inoperative on January 1, 2021. (5) Existing law authorizes the department to license, no later than January 1, 2019, and contingent upon an appropriation in the annual Budget Act for these purposes, a short-term residential therapeutic program operating as a children's crisis residential program, as defined, and requires the department to regulate those programs. This bill would specify distinct program approval requirements for short-term residential treatment programs that serve only children who are experiencing mental health crises and programs that also serve children who are not experiencing mental health crises. (6) Existing law establishes the Foster Family Home and Small Family Home Insurance Fund within the State Department of Social Services to pay, on behalf of foster family homes, small family homes, and resource families, claims of foster children, their parents, guardians, or guardians ad litem resulting from occurrences peculiar to the foster care relationship and the provision of foster care services. This bill would authorize the Foster Family Home and Small Family Home Insurance Fund to make, on or after January 1, 2020, payments on behalf of tribally approved homes. (7) Existing law authorizes a court to make any reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of a minor or nonminor, if they are adjudged a ward of the court. Existing law, in conformity with federal law, requires a probation agency to determine the appropriate placement for the ward once the court issues a placement order. This bill would authorize a probation agency to make an emergency placement of a minor with a relative or nonrelative extended family member if the probation agency takes specified action, including conducting an in-home inspection and requiring the relative or nonrelative extended family member to submit an application for approval as a resource family. (8) Existing law, as part of the CCR, updated payment rate structures for foster care programs, and requires the home-based family care rate structure to be implemented as of January 1, 2017. Existing law requires that cases in which guardianship has been established in the probate court receive the basic foster care maintenance rate effective and available as of December 31, 2016, instead of the home-based family care rate. This bill would instead require cases in which guardianship has been established in the probate court to receive the basic level rate of the home-based family care rate structure. (9) Existing law requires the state, through the department and county welfare departments, to establish and support a public system of statewide child welfare services, and requires the department to implement a single statewide Child Welfare Services Case Management System (CWS/CMS) to administer and evaluate the state's child welfare services and foster care programs. Existing federal regulations require a child welfare contributing agency, as defined, to provide specified data from the Comprehensive Child Welfare Information Systems and support bidirectional data exchanges to exchange relevant data amongst various systems. This bill would require the department to determine which entities are a child welfare contributing agency for purposes of the federal regulations, and to develop and issue written directives for child welfare contributing agencies on specified matters, including how to submit data to applicable child welfare case management systems. The bill would require each child welfare contributing agency to provide child welfare services data to the statewide child welfare case management system. To the extent that the reporting requirements increase the workload of county agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (10) Existing law requires the department to develop an intensive services foster care program to serve children with specific needs, including intensive treatment and behavioral needs and specialized health care needs, whose needs for safety, permanency, and well-being require specially trained resource parents and intensive professional and paraprofessional services and supports in order to remain in a home-based setting or to avoid or exit congregate care in a short-term residential therapeutic program, group home, or out-of-state residential center. Existing law prohibits more than 2 foster children from being placed in an intensive services foster care resource family home if one or both of the children has intensive needs. Existing law, notwithstanding that provision, authorizes up to 5 foster children to be placed in an intensive services foster care resource family home in order to accommodate sibling group placement. Existing law requires, prior to the placement of a 2nd or subsequent child in an intensive services foster care resource family home, a foster family agency to provide the county placing agency with a written assessment of risks and compatibility. The bill would instead authorize a county placing agency to approve placements for no more than 3 foster children, 2 of whom may be eligible children, in an intensive services foster care resource family home, and would authorize the county to approve additional placements in compelling circumstances, such as to accommodate a preexisting relationship, if specified requirements are met, including that the needs and services plan of each child placed in the home would ensure timely support and services for that child. The bill would condition these additional placements on the approval of the director of the county child welfare department or the chief probation officer of the county probation department. The bill would require the department to adopt regulations to implement the intensive services foster care program, and would authorize the department, until regulations are adopted, to administer the program through the issuance of written directives. The bill would require a foster family agency that intends to operate an intensive services foster care program to provide to the department a description of the program model and how it intends to comply with specified statutory requirements. This bill would also require the department, in consultation with counties and other interested stakeholders, to consider options to expand the number of available resource families who are willing to provide intensive services foster care. (11) If a relative of a dependent child is appointed the legal guardian of the child and the child has been placed with the relative for at least 6 months, existing law requires the court to terminate its dependency jurisdiction and to retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the guardianship, unless the relative guardian objects or upon a finding of exceptional circumstances. This bill would also apply this provision to a nonrelative extended family member. The bill would instead condition the requirement for the court to terminate dependency jurisdiction on the guardian's home maintaining resource family approval for at least 6 months. (12) Existing law, the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, requires a mandated reporter, as defined, to report whenever they, in their professional capacity or within the scope of their employment, have knowledge of or observed a child whom the mandated reporter knows or reasonably suspects has been the victim of child abuse or neglect. Existing law grants civil and criminal immunity to specified individuals, including a mandated reporter, for any report that is required or authorized by the act. This bill would extend civil and criminal immunity to any person who, in good faith, provides information or assistance, in connection with a report, investigation, or legal intervention pursuant to a good faith report of child abuse or neglect under the act. (13) Existing law continuously appropriates funds from the General Fund to defray a portion of the state's share of costs under the CalWORKs program, the AFDC-FC program, and for the placement of hard-to-place adoptive children. This bill would provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for purposes of implementing the bill. (14) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1517 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 686 to be operative only if this bill and AB 686 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16519.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 686 and AB 865 to be operative only if this bill and AB 686, this bill and AB 865, or all 3 bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (15) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 777, Statutes of 2019.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3288.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3252.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2687.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  15. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  18. Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  20. Withdrawn from committee.

  21. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  23. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  25. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  26. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  27. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1590.)

  28. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  29. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 1).

  30. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  31. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  32. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  33. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  34. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  35. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  36. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  37. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 52000
Democratic 22000
Republican 5000
Total 79000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chu — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Salas — Yea
Brough — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Weber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Levine — Yea
Wood — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27000
Democratic 10000
Republican 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Chang — Yea
Pan — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47001
Democratic 24001
Republican 5002
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Voepel — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7000
Unaffiliated 11000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4000
Republican 1000
Democratic 3000
Total 8000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Friedman — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 819 do?
(1) Existing law, commonly known as Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) , states the intent of the Legislature to improve California's child welfare system and its outcomes by increasing the use of home-based family care and creating faster paths to permanency resulting in shorter durations of involvement in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, among other things. Existing law, as part of the CCR, requires the State Department of Social Services to implement a resource family approval process, and directs counties and foster family agencies, commencing January 1, 2017, to approve resource families in lieu of licensing and certifying foster homes. Existing law defines a resource family as an individual or family that has successfully met both home environment assessment standards and permanency assessment criteria. Existing law requires the department to review resource family approval standards, including case file documentation. Existing law requires foster family agencies to prepare a written report on an applicant's capacity to foster, adopt, and provide legal guardianship of a child based on information gathered through the resource family application and assessment processes, and requires counties and foster family agencies, when a resource family seeks approval by a subsequent foster family agency or transfer of their approval to a county, to request or provide the above-specified written report, including any updates to the report. This bill would require counties and foster family agencies, when a resource family seeks approval by a subsequent foster family agency or transfer of their approval to a county, to request or provide documents in the resource family file maintained by a county or the resource family case record maintained by a foster family agency, including any updates to the file or record. By imposing additional duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the department to license and regulate various facilities, including community care facilities, residential care facilities for persons with chronic, life-threatening illness, child daycare centers, family childcare homes, and licensed foster family homes or certified family homes, and generally makes violations of these requirements a crime. Existing law requires the department to secure from an appropriate law enforcement agency a criminal record to determine whether an applicant or specified persons have been convicted of a crime, and prohibits the department from approving applicants who have committed specified crimes. Existing law authorizes the department to prohibit a person from being a member of the board of directors, an executive director, or an officer of one of the above-specified facilities if they, among other things, have engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either the people of the state or an individual in or receiving services from the facility or have engaged in acts of financial malfeasance concerning the operation of the facility. Existing law generally prohibits an excluded person from working in a facility or being licensed to operate any facility licensed by the department or from being a certified foster parent or resource family for the remainder of the excluded person's life if the excluded person appealed the exclusion order and there is a decision and order of the department upholding the exclusion order. This bill would state that an excluded person is prohibited from being a resource family. The bill would impose specified criminal background check requirements on individuals who work in a community care facility that is eligible to accept placement of a dependent child. By expanding the requirements on those facilities, the violation of which is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law authorizes specified caregivers who are not licensed health care professionals to administer subcutaneous injections of medications to a foster child in placement, as prescribed by the child's physician. This bill would additionally authorize a staff member of a group home who provides direct care and supervision to children and youth residing in the group home to administer those injections to a foster child in placement. (4) Existing law requires the department to establish rates for short-term residential therapeutic programs and foster family agencies that include an interim rate that is effective January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, inclusive, and that becomes inoperative on January 1, 2020. This bill would instead make that interim rate effective January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020, inclusive, and would make it inoperative on January 1, 2021. (5) Existing law authorizes the department to license, no later than January 1, 2019, and contingent upon an appropriation in the annual Budget Act for these purposes, a short-term residential therapeutic program operating as a children's crisis residential program, as defined, and requires the department to regulate those programs. This bill would specify distinct program approval requirements for short-term residential treatment programs that serve only children who are experiencing mental health crises and programs that also serve children who are not experiencing mental health crises. (6) Existing law establishes the Foster Family Home and Small Family Home Insurance Fund within the State Department of Social Services to pay, on behalf of foster family homes, small family homes, and resource families, claims of foster children, their parents, guardians, or guardians ad litem resulting from occurrences peculiar to the foster care relationship and the provision of foster care services. This bill would authorize the Foster Family Home and Small Family Home Insurance Fund to make, on or after January 1, 2020, payments on behalf of tribally approved homes. (7) Existing law authorizes a court to make any reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of a minor or nonminor, if they are adjudged a ward of the court. Existing law, in conformity with federal law, requires a probation agency to determine the appropriate placement for the ward once the court issues a placement order. This bill would authorize a probation agency to make an emergency placement of a minor with a relative or nonrelative extended family member if the probation agency takes specified action, including conducting an in-home inspection and requiring the relative or nonrelative extended family member to submit an application for approval as a resource family. (8) Existing law, as part of the CCR, updated payment rate structures for foster care programs, and requires the home-based family care rate structure to be implemented as of January 1, 2017. Existing law requires that cases in which guardianship has been established in the probate court receive the basic foster care maintenance rate effective and available as of December 31, 2016, instead of the home-based family care rate. This bill would instead require cases in which guardianship has been established in the probate court to receive the basic level rate of the home-based family care rate structure. (9) Existing law requires the state, through the department and county welfare departments, to establish and support a public system of statewide child welfare services, and requires the department to implement a single statewide Child Welfare Services Case Management System (CWS/CMS) to administer and evaluate the state's child welfare services and foster care programs. Existing federal regulations require a child welfare contributing agency, as defined, to provide specified data from the Comprehensive Child Welfare Information Systems and support bidirectional data exchanges to exchange relevant data amongst various systems. This bill would require the department to determine which entities are a child welfare contributing agency for purposes of the federal regulations, and to develop and issue written directives for child welfare contributing agencies on specified matters, including how to submit data to applicable child welfare case management systems. The bill would require each child welfare contributing agency to provide child welfare services data to the statewide child welfare case management system. To the extent that the reporting requirements increase the workload of county agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (10) Existing law requires the department to develop an intensive services foster care program to serve children with specific needs, including intensive treatment and behavioral needs and specialized health care needs, whose needs for safety, permanency, and well-being require specially trained resource parents and intensive professional and paraprofessional services and supports in order to remain in a home-based setting or to avoid or exit congregate care in a short-term residential therapeutic program, group home, or out-of-state residential center. Existing law prohibits more than 2 foster children from being placed in an intensive services foster care resource family home if one or both of the children has intensive needs. Existing law, notwithstanding that provision, authorizes up to 5 foster children to be placed in an intensive services foster care resource family home in order to accommodate sibling group placement. Existing law requires, prior to the placement of a 2nd or subsequent child in an intensive services foster care resource family home, a foster family agency to provide the county placing agency with a written assessment of risks and compatibility. The bill would instead authorize a county placing agency to approve placements for no more than 3 foster children, 2 of whom may be eligible children, in an intensive services foster care resource family home, and would authorize the county to approve additional placements in compelling circumstances, such as to accommodate a preexisting relationship, if specified requirements are met, including that the needs and services plan of each child placed in the home would ensure timely support and services for that child. The bill would condition these additional placements on the approval of the director of the county child welfare department or the chief probation officer of the county probation department. The bill would require the department to adopt regulations to implement the intensive services foster care program, and would authorize the department, until regulations are adopted, to administer the program through the issuance of written directives. The bill would require a foster family agency that intends to operate an intensive services foster care program to provide to the department a description of the program model and how it intends to comply with specified statutory requirements. This bill would also require the department, in consultation with counties and other interested stakeholders, to consider options to expand the number of available resource families who are willing to provide intensive services foster care. (11) If a relative of a dependent child is appointed the legal guardian of the child and the child has been placed with the relative for at least 6 months, existing law requires the court to terminate its dependency jurisdiction and to retain jurisdiction over the child as a ward of the guardianship, unless the relative guardian objects or upon a finding of exceptional circumstances. This bill would also apply this provision to a nonrelative extended family member. The bill would instead condition the requirement for the court to terminate dependency jurisdiction on the guardian's home maintaining resource family approval for at least 6 months. (12) Existing law, the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, requires a mandated reporter, as defined, to report whenever they, in their professional capacity or within the scope of their employment, have knowledge of or observed a child whom the mandated reporter knows or reasonably suspects has been the victim of child abuse or neglect. Existing law grants civil and criminal immunity to specified individuals, including a mandated reporter, for any report that is required or authorized by the act. This bill would extend civil and criminal immunity to any person who, in good faith, provides information or assistance, in connection with a report, investigation, or legal intervention pursuant to a good faith report of child abuse or neglect under the act. (13) Existing law continuously appropriates funds from the General Fund to defray a portion of the state's share of costs under the CalWORKs program, the AFDC-FC program, and for the placement of hard-to-place adoptive children. This bill would provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for purposes of implementing the bill. (14) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1517 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 686 to be operative only if this bill and AB 686 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16519.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 686 and AB 865 to be operative only if this bill and AB 686, this bill and AB 865, or all 3 bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (15) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 819?
AB 819 is sponsored by Mark Stone.
What is the current status of AB 819?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 819?
Track AB 819 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 819

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 819

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →