California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 522 — Business entities: filings.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2020.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, namely the General Corporation Law, the Social Purpose Corporations Act, the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law, the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, the Nonprofit Religious Corporation Law, and the Cooperative Corporation Law, among other things, prohibits the Secretary of State from filing articles of incorporation that set forth a name likely to mislead the public or that is the same as, or so similar as tends to deceive, the name of specified domestic and foreign corporations, except that a corporation is authorized to adopt a name that is substantially the same as a specified existing domestic or foreign corporation, upon proof of consent by that corporation and a finding by the secretary that the public, under the circumstances, is unlikely to be misled. This bill would eliminate the above-described exception. Existing law, the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, exempts a domestic or foreign professional corporation's name from specified naming requirements in the General Corporation Law as long as the name of the professional corporation contains, and is restricted to, the name or last name of specified persons, including, but not limited to, present, prospective, or former shareholders. The act prohibits the Secretary of State from using specified naming requirements in the General Corporation Law to refuse to file articles of incorporation or issue a certificate of qualification, as applicable, that sets forth a name that does not comply with those requirements. However, under existing law, the name is prohibited from being substantially the same as the name of a domestic corporation, the name of a foreign corporation qualified to render professional services in this state that is authorized to transact business in this state, or a name that is under reservation for another corporation. This bill would delete the exemption and make the domestic and foreign professional corporations subject to the naming requirements of the General Corporation Law. Existing law, the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, requires the name of a limited partnership be distinguishable from the names of other domestic and foreign limited partnerships that have previously filed a certificate or registered, as applicable, with the Secretary of State and from reserved names. An exemption to these requirements authorizes a limited partnership to apply to the Secretary for authorization to use a name that does not comply with those requirements, and the Secretary is required to authorize the use of the noncomplying name if certain conditions are met. This bill would delete the exception and would prohibit the name from being one that the Secretary determines is likely to mislead the public. The bill would also authorize enjoining the use of a name violating these provisions notwithstanding the Secretary filing the certificate of limited partnership. Existing law, the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, prohibits the name of a limited liability company from being one that the Secretary of State determines is likely to mislead the public and requires the name to be distinguishable from the names of other domestic and foreign limited liability companies that are authorized to transact business in this state and from reserved names. An exemption to this prohibition authorizes a limited liability company to apply to the Secretary for authorization to use a name that does not comply with those requirements, and the Secretary is required to authorize the use of the noncomplying name if certain conditions are met. This bill would delete the exception and would also authorize enjoining the use of a name violating these provisions notwithstanding the Secretary of State filing the limited liability company's articles. Existing law specifies the formal requirements for filings with the Secretary of State by general, nonprofit, sole organized, and cooperative corporations. This bill would require, with respect to general, nonprofit, and cooperative corporations, that general filings with the Secretary of State contain the corporate name and number as they appear in the Secretary of State's records. This bill would impose similar requirements for the filings of amendments to articles of incorporation and declarations of dissolution by sole organized corporations.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5282.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  9. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 18).

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. July 27 hearing postponed by committee.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

  13. Referred to Com. on B. & F.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3130.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  18. Set for hearing January 21.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3098.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & F.I. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3088.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.

  22. Set for hearing January 15 in B. & F.I. pending receipt.

  23. Set for hearing January 14.

  24. Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F.I.

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  26. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  27. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  28. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hertzberg · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hertzberg

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 48003
Democratic 21001
Republican 6000
Total 75004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Weber — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Gray — Yea
Salas — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Ting — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Brough — Yea
Fong — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Diep — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chau — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gloria — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Daly — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Smith — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Not Voting
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Republican 2001
Unaffiliated 27000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Galgiani — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Allen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Roth — Yea
Chang — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 11000
Republican 1000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Chau — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Diep — Yea
Fong — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5000
Unaffiliated 6000
Republican 1000
Total 12000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Weber — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 24002
Democratic 10000
Republican 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Roth — Yea
Hill — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Atkins — Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Democratic 4001
Unaffiliated 3000
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 522 do?
Existing law, namely the General Corporation Law, the Social Purpose Corporations Act, the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law, the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, the Nonprofit Religious Corporation Law, and the Cooperative Corporation Law, among other things, prohibits the Secretary of State from filing articles of incorporation that set forth a name likely to mislead the public or that is the same as, or so similar as tends to deceive, the name of specified domestic and foreign corporations, except that a corporation is authorized to adopt a name that is substantially the same as a specified existing domestic or foreign corporation, upon proof of consent by that corporation and a finding by the secretary that the public, under the circumstances, is unlikely to be misled. This bill would eliminate the above-described exception. Existing law, the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, exempts a domestic or foreign professional corporation's name from specified naming requirements in the General Corporation Law as long as the name of the professional corporation contains, and is restricted to, the name or last name of specified persons, including, but not limited to, present, prospective, or former shareholders. The act prohibits the Secretary of State from using specified naming requirements in the General Corporation Law to refuse to file articles of incorporation or issue a certificate of qualification, as applicable, that sets forth a name that does not comply with those requirements. However, under existing law, the name is prohibited from being substantially the same as the name of a domestic corporation, the name of a foreign corporation qualified to render professional services in this state that is authorized to transact business in this state, or a name that is under reservation for another corporation. This bill would delete the exemption and make the domestic and foreign professional corporations subject to the naming requirements of the General Corporation Law. Existing law, the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, requires the name of a limited partnership be distinguishable from the names of other domestic and foreign limited partnerships that have previously filed a certificate or registered, as applicable, with the Secretary of State and from reserved names. An exemption to these requirements authorizes a limited partnership to apply to the Secretary for authorization to use a name that does not comply with those requirements, and the Secretary is required to authorize the use of the noncomplying name if certain conditions are met. This bill would delete the exception and would prohibit the name from being one that the Secretary determines is likely to mislead the public. The bill would also authorize enjoining the use of a name violating these provisions notwithstanding the Secretary filing the certificate of limited partnership. Existing law, the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, prohibits the name of a limited liability company from being one that the Secretary of State determines is likely to mislead the public and requires the name to be distinguishable from the names of other domestic and foreign limited liability companies that are authorized to transact business in this state and from reserved names. An exemption to this prohibition authorizes a limited liability company to apply to the Secretary for authorization to use a name that does not comply with those requirements, and the Secretary is required to authorize the use of the noncomplying name if certain conditions are met. This bill would delete the exception and would also authorize enjoining the use of a name violating these provisions notwithstanding the Secretary of State filing the limited liability company's articles. Existing law specifies the formal requirements for filings with the Secretary of State by general, nonprofit, sole organized, and cooperative corporations. This bill would require, with respect to general, nonprofit, and cooperative corporations, that general filings with the Secretary of State contain the corporate name and number as they appear in the Secretary of State's records. This bill would impose similar requirements for the filings of amendments to articles of incorporation and declarations of dissolution by sole organized corporations.
Who sponsors SB 522?
SB 522 is sponsored by Hertzberg.
What is the current status of SB 522?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 522?
Track SB 522 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 522

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 522

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →