Medi-Cal: managed care plans.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1642 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1642.
You're tracking AB 1642
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1642 — Medi-Cal: managed care plans.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 465, Statutes of 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons through various health care delivery systems, including managed care pursuant to Medi-Cal managed care plan contracts. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing federal regulations require a state that contracts with specified Medicaid managed care plans to develop and enforce network adequacy standards, to ensure that services covered under the Medicaid state plan are available and accessible to enrollees of specified Medicaid managed care plans in a timely manner, and to contract with a qualified external quality review organization (EQRO) to produce annually an external quality review technical report that summarizes findings on access and quality of care. Existing state law establishes, until January 1, 2022, certain time and distance and appointment time standards for specified services consistent with those federal regulations to ensure that Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, and authorizes a Medi-Cal managed care plan to request approval from the department to use alternative access standards for the time and distance standards if specified conditions are met, including that the Medi-Cal managed care plan has exhausted all reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard. Existing state law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to provide annually to the department, or upon the department's request, a report that demonstrates the Medi-Cal managed care plan's compliance with time and distance standards, and requires the EQRO to compile various data, by plan and by county, related to time and distance standards, including the number of requests for alternative access standards in the plan service area for time and distance. This bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan to provide to the department additional information in its request for the alternative access standards, including a description of the reasons justifying the alternative access standards, and to demonstrate to the department how the Medi-Cal managed care plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, such as through the use of Medi-Cal covered transportation. The bill would require the department to evaluate, as part of its review and approval of an alternative access standard, if the resulting time and distance is reasonable to expect a beneficiary to travel to receive care. The bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan that has received approval from the department to utilize an alternative access standard to assist an enrollee who would travel farther than the established time and distance standards in obtaining an appointment with an appropriate provider within established appointment time and distance standards, to arrange for Medi-Cal covered transportation for the enrollee, as determined by the department, and to inform affected members of the approved alternative access standards. This bill would require the information compiled by the EQRO to include the extent to which each Medi-Cal managed care plan uses clinically appropriate telecommunications technology to meet established time and distance standards. (2) Existing law requires the Director of Health Care Services, in accordance with specified procedures, to either terminate a contract with or impose one or more specified sanctions, including civil penalties pursuant to federal law, on a prepaid health plan or Medi-Cal managed care plan if the department makes a finding of noncompliance or for other good cause. This bill would modify criteria for a finding of noncompliance or for other good cause under those provisions. The bill would expand the types of authorized sanctions and bases for sanctions, would raise the maximum limits of certain sanctions based on the number of violations, and would modify the terms of notice. The bill would require the department to use nonfederal moneys collected by the department under these provisions to be deposited into the General Fund for use, and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, would require these moneys to be used to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and to improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program. The bill would condition the implementation of these requirements on receipt of any necessary federal approvals and the availability of federal financial participation. The bill would make technical and conforming changes related to these requirements. (3) Existing law requires the department to implement managed mental health care for Medi-Cal beneficiaries through contracts with county mental health plans. Under existing law, the county mental health plans are responsible for providing specialty mental health services to beneficiaries, and Medi-Cal managed care health plans are responsible for delivering nonspecialty mental health services to beneficiaries. Existing law requires the department to notify the mental health plan of the department's determination that a mental health plan has failed to comply with certain provisions, and authorizes the department to impose sanctions. Existing law authorizes the department, if the department imposes fines or penalties, to offset the fines from certain accounts, including the Mental Health Subaccount. This bill would instead extend the provisions described under paragraph (2) to mental health plans, and would apply those provisions to additional contractors. The bill would authorize the department to temporarily withhold payments of federal financial participation and payments from the above-described accounts until the department determines the contractor has come into compliance.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/02/19 - Chaptered Current pdf October 02, 2019
- Enrolled 09/12/19 - Enrolled pdf September 12, 2019
- Amended 08/30/19 - Amended Senate pdf August 30, 2019
- Amended 07/11/19 - Amended Senate pdf July 11, 2019
- Amended 07/01/19 - Amended Senate pdf July 01, 2019
- Amended 05/16/19 - Amended Assembly pdf May 16, 2019
- Amended 04/23/19 - Amended Assembly pdf April 23, 2019
- Amended 04/01/19 - Amended Assembly pdf April 01, 2019
- Amended 03/18/19 - Amended Assembly pdf March 18, 2019
- Introduced 02/22/19 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2019
- AB1642 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 465, Statutes of 2019.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 3163.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (September 6).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 3040.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 1. Page 2523.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 10).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 2. Page 2101.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (May 16).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1760.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1609.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 9).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Wood · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wood
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 67 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 3% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 6% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1642 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons through various health care delivery systems, including managed care pursuant to Medi-Cal managed care plan contracts. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing federal regulations require a state that contracts with specified Medicaid managed care plans to develop and enforce network adequacy standards, to ensure that services covered under the Medicaid state plan are available and accessible to enrollees of specified Medicaid managed care plans in a timely manner, and to contract with a qualified external quality review organization (EQRO) to produce annually an external quality review technical report that summarizes findings on access and quality of care. Existing state law establishes, until January 1, 2022, certain time and distance and appointment time standards for specified services consistent with those federal regulations to ensure that Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, and authorizes a Medi-Cal managed care plan to request approval from the department to use alternative access standards for the time and distance standards if specified conditions are met, including that the Medi-Cal managed care plan has exhausted all reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard. Existing state law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to provide annually to the department, or upon the department's request, a report that demonstrates the Medi-Cal managed care plan's compliance with time and distance standards, and requires the EQRO to compile various data, by plan and by county, related to time and distance standards, including the number of requests for alternative access standards in the plan service area for time and distance. This bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan to provide to the department additional information in its request for the alternative access standards, including a description of the reasons justifying the alternative access standards, and to demonstrate to the department how the Medi-Cal managed care plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, such as through the use of Medi-Cal covered transportation. The bill would require the department to evaluate, as part of its review and approval of an alternative access standard, if the resulting time and distance is reasonable to expect a beneficiary to travel to receive care. The bill would require a Medi-Cal managed care plan that has received approval from the department to utilize an alternative access standard to assist an enrollee who would travel farther than the established time and distance standards in obtaining an appointment with an appropriate provider within established appointment time and distance standards, to arrange for Medi-Cal covered transportation for the enrollee, as determined by the department, and to inform affected members of the approved alternative access standards. This bill would require the information compiled by the EQRO to include the extent to which each Medi-Cal managed care plan uses clinically appropriate telecommunications technology to meet established time and distance standards. (2) Existing law requires the Director of Health Care Services, in accordance with specified procedures, to either terminate a contract with or impose one or more specified sanctions, including civil penalties pursuant to federal law, on a prepaid health plan or Medi-Cal managed care plan if the department makes a finding of noncompliance or for other good cause. This bill would modify criteria for a finding of noncompliance or for other good cause under those provisions. The bill would expand the types of authorized sanctions and bases for sanctions, would raise the maximum limits of certain sanctions based on the number of violations, and would modify the terms of notice. The bill would require the department to use nonfederal moneys collected by the department under these provisions to be deposited into the General Fund for use, and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, would require these moneys to be used to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and to improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program. The bill would condition the implementation of these requirements on receipt of any necessary federal approvals and the availability of federal financial participation. The bill would make technical and conforming changes related to these requirements. (3) Existing law requires the department to implement managed mental health care for Medi-Cal beneficiaries through contracts with county mental health plans. Under existing law, the county mental health plans are responsible for providing specialty mental health services to beneficiaries, and Medi-Cal managed care health plans are responsible for delivering nonspecialty mental health services to beneficiaries. Existing law requires the department to notify the mental health plan of the department's determination that a mental health plan has failed to comply with certain provisions, and authorizes the department to impose sanctions. Existing law authorizes the department, if the department imposes fines or penalties, to offset the fines from certain accounts, including the Mental Health Subaccount. This bill would instead extend the provisions described under paragraph (2) to mental health plans, and would apply those provisions to additional contractors. The bill would authorize the department to temporarily withhold payments of federal financial participation and payments from the above-described accounts until the department determines the contractor has come into compliance.
- Who sponsors AB 1642?
- AB 1642 is sponsored by Wood.
- What is the current status of AB 1642?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1642?
- Track AB 1642 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1642
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1642
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →