Firearms: transfers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 376 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 376.
You're tracking SB 376
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 376 — Firearms: transfers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 738, Statutes of 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law generally requires any person who sells, leases, or transfers firearms to be a licensed dealer, as specified. Existing law exempts infrequent sales, leases, and transfers from this requirement. Existing law generally prohibits the purchase or receipt of a firearm by, or sale, transfer, or loan of a firearm, to, a person who does not have a firearm safety certificate. Existing law exempts from this requirement, the infrequent loan of a firearm. Existing law defines "infrequent" for purposes of this exemption to mean less than 6 handgun transactions per calendar year, or, for firearms other than handguns, an indefinite number of transactions that are "occasional and without regularity." This bill would redefine "infrequent" to mean less than 6 firearm transactions per calendar year, regardless of the type of firearm, and no more than 50 total firearms within those transactions. Existing law exempts from the dealer requirement, the transfer of a firearm by bequest or intestate succession, or to a surviving spouse. This bill would extend that exemption to the transfer of a firearm to a trust beneficiary, as specified. This bill would also exempt from the requirement specified transfers made by a formerly licensed dealer that is ceasing operations, transfers made to a specified government entity as part of a "gun-buyback" program, and transfers made by a person prohibited from possessing a firearm to a dealer for the purpose of storing that firearm. Existing law provides certain exemptions to prohibitions on openly carrying a firearm, storage of firearms, dealer processing requirements, and off-premises transactions by a licensed dealer, for specified charity auctions and similar events. This bill would clarify that these exemptions also apply to charity raffles. This bill would also remove the limitation on the number of firearm transactions allowed by a charity auction and instead require all firearms sold or otherwise transferred by auction or raffle to be delivered to a licensed dealer for delivery to the recipient. Existing law requires a person manufacturing 100 or more firearms each year in the state to be licensed as a manufacturer. This bill would instead require anybody manufacturing 50 or more firearms to be licensed. Existing law requires a licensed dealer processing the transfer of a firearm to hold the firearm for a designated waiting period before releasing the firearm. Existing law exempts certain firearms transactions that occur as part of a charitable auction, as specified, from this waiting period. This bill would repeal the waiting period exemption for charitable auctions. This bill also makes technical and conforming changes and changes that are declaratory of existing law. A violation of various provisions involving the transfer, manufacture, and carrying of firearms is a crime. By changing the scope of these offenses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make conforming changes to Section 11108.2 of the Penal Code that would be operative only if AB 1669 becomes operative. This bill would make changes to Section 26556 of the Penal Code that would be operative only if AB 1009 becomes operative. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 27966 and 28230 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1009 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1009 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/19 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2019
- Enrolled 09/13/19 - Enrolled pdf September 13, 2019
- Amended 09/06/19 - Amended Assembly pdf September 06, 2019
- Amended 06/11/19 - Amended Assembly pdf June 11, 2019
- Amended 05/17/19 - Amended Senate pdf May 17, 2019
- Amended 03/25/19 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2019
- Introduced 02/20/19 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2019
- SB376 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 738, Statutes of 2019.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 2843.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 3267.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 4.) (August 30).
-
August 14 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
June 25 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 9. Page 1251.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 1098.) (May 16).
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
April 22 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 526.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 2.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Portantino · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Portantino
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 30% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 19 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 24% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 24% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 376 do?
- Existing law generally requires any person who sells, leases, or transfers firearms to be a licensed dealer, as specified. Existing law exempts infrequent sales, leases, and transfers from this requirement. Existing law generally prohibits the purchase or receipt of a firearm by, or sale, transfer, or loan of a firearm, to, a person who does not have a firearm safety certificate. Existing law exempts from this requirement, the infrequent loan of a firearm. Existing law defines "infrequent" for purposes of this exemption to mean less than 6 handgun transactions per calendar year, or, for firearms other than handguns, an indefinite number of transactions that are "occasional and without regularity." This bill would redefine "infrequent" to mean less than 6 firearm transactions per calendar year, regardless of the type of firearm, and no more than 50 total firearms within those transactions. Existing law exempts from the dealer requirement, the transfer of a firearm by bequest or intestate succession, or to a surviving spouse. This bill would extend that exemption to the transfer of a firearm to a trust beneficiary, as specified. This bill would also exempt from the requirement specified transfers made by a formerly licensed dealer that is ceasing operations, transfers made to a specified government entity as part of a "gun-buyback" program, and transfers made by a person prohibited from possessing a firearm to a dealer for the purpose of storing that firearm. Existing law provides certain exemptions to prohibitions on openly carrying a firearm, storage of firearms, dealer processing requirements, and off-premises transactions by a licensed dealer, for specified charity auctions and similar events. This bill would clarify that these exemptions also apply to charity raffles. This bill would also remove the limitation on the number of firearm transactions allowed by a charity auction and instead require all firearms sold or otherwise transferred by auction or raffle to be delivered to a licensed dealer for delivery to the recipient. Existing law requires a person manufacturing 100 or more firearms each year in the state to be licensed as a manufacturer. This bill would instead require anybody manufacturing 50 or more firearms to be licensed. Existing law requires a licensed dealer processing the transfer of a firearm to hold the firearm for a designated waiting period before releasing the firearm. Existing law exempts certain firearms transactions that occur as part of a charitable auction, as specified, from this waiting period. This bill would repeal the waiting period exemption for charitable auctions. This bill also makes technical and conforming changes and changes that are declaratory of existing law. A violation of various provisions involving the transfer, manufacture, and carrying of firearms is a crime. By changing the scope of these offenses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make conforming changes to Section 11108.2 of the Penal Code that would be operative only if AB 1669 becomes operative. This bill would make changes to Section 26556 of the Penal Code that would be operative only if AB 1009 becomes operative. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 27966 and 28230 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1009 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1009 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 376?
- SB 376 is sponsored by Portantino.
- What is the current status of SB 376?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 376?
- Track SB 376 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 376
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 376
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →