California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1077 — Collaborative court program incentives.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant in specified cases, including when the defendant is suffering from a mental disorder, specified controlled substances crimes, and when the defendant was, or currently is, a member of the United States military. Existing law imposes various fines, fees, penalties, and assessments on a defendant in a criminal proceeding, including the fine set by statute, restitution fines and fees, and assessments to support the state court system. This bill would require the court, when an indigent defendant enters a collaborative court program, to waive all penalties assessed over the base fines for current and prior nonfelony violations of the Vehicle Code and other misdemeanors or infractions. The bill would also require the court to suspend all remaining fines for an indigent defendant pending successful completion of the collaborative court program and authorize the court to determine how an indigent defendant will satisfy the suspended fines by specified methods that include a complete or partial waiver of the fines. The bill would reinstate all previously waived or suspended fines for a defendant who is removed from a collaborative court program prior to completion and prosecution proceeds or sentencing is imposed. The bill would define terms for its purposes and make legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 2).

  8. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  10. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  12. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Eggman · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Eggman

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1077 do?
Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant in specified cases, including when the defendant is suffering from a mental disorder, specified controlled substances crimes, and when the defendant was, or currently is, a member of the United States military. Existing law imposes various fines, fees, penalties, and assessments on a defendant in a criminal proceeding, including the fine set by statute, restitution fines and fees, and assessments to support the state court system. This bill would require the court, when an indigent defendant enters a collaborative court program, to waive all penalties assessed over the base fines for current and prior nonfelony violations of the Vehicle Code and other misdemeanors or infractions. The bill would also require the court to suspend all remaining fines for an indigent defendant pending successful completion of the collaborative court program and authorize the court to determine how an indigent defendant will satisfy the suspended fines by specified methods that include a complete or partial waiver of the fines. The bill would reinstate all previously waived or suspended fines for a defendant who is removed from a collaborative court program prior to completion and prosecution proceeds or sentencing is imposed. The bill would define terms for its purposes and make legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1077?
AB 1077 is sponsored by Eggman.
What is the current status of AB 1077?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1077?
Track AB 1077 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1077

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1077

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →