Retirement savings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 102 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 102.
You're tracking AB 102
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 102 — Retirement savings.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 21, Statutes of 2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act, establishes the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program and the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust, a trust consisting of a program fund and an administrative fund with trust moneys that are continuously appropriated and administered by the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board. Existing law requires the Treasurer, on behalf of the board, to appoint an executive director who is not a member of the board and who serves at its pleasure. Existing law requires eligible employers to offer a payroll deposit retirement savings arrangement so that eligible employees may contribute a portion of their salary or wages to a retirement savings program account in the program, as specified. Existing law requires the board to take various actions upon implementation of the program and, for up to 3 years following its initial implementation of the program, requires the board to establish managed accounts invested in United States Treasuries, myRAs, or similar investments. Existing law states that the program is implemented as of January 1, 2017. This bill would rename the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act as the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust Act, the body that administers the act as the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board, and would make conforming changes in this regard. The bill would make various changes in the act to reflect that it has been implemented, including eliminating the requirement to establish managed accounts invested in United States Treasuries, myRAs, or similar investments described above. The bill would authorize the board to delegate rulemaking authority to its executive director. The bill would authorize an employee to opt out of participation in the program by telephone and would eliminate a condition relating to contribution amounts that depends on the length of time that an employee has contributed to the program. The bill would grant the board the power to administer the enforcement of employer compliance, including the power to impose specified penalties on employers who fail to allow eligible employees to participate in the program, subject to an appeals and collections process administered by the Franchise Tax Board, as specified below. (2) Existing law authorizes the collection of various debts by the Franchise Tax Board, including fines, state or local penalties, bail, forfeitures, restitution fines, restitution orders, and other amounts imposed by state courts and delinquent tax debt due. Existing law, the Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal) Act, establishes the FI$Cal system, a single integrated financial management system for the state. This bill would authorize penalties imposed on an employer under the CalSavers Retirement Savers Program for failure to comply with the program to be referred by the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) for collection under guidelines prescribed by the FTB. The bill would require the FTB to establish criteria, including a minimum dollar amount subject to referral and collection. The bill, upon written notice to a noncompliant employer, would treat amounts referred to the FTB as final and payable and would authorize the amounts to be collected from the eligible employer by the FTB in any manner authorized for collection of a delinquent income tax liability, except as specified. The bill would establish specified administrative procedures, including an appeals process. The bill would require amounts collected by the FTB to be transmitted to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board for deposit in the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust or remitted by means of the Fi$Cal system. By authorizing amounts collected by the FTB to be transferred to the board for deposit into the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust, a continuously appropriated trust, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor, except as specified, for the FTB or any deputy, agent, clerk, or other officer or employee of the state who has access to returns, reports, or documents filed under the franchise and income tax laws to disclose information regarding income or particulars from those documents. This bill, notwithstanding that provision, would authorize the FTB to disclose information to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board to facilitate the collection of amounts due and the appeals of the determination of the board, as specified. (3) Existing law grants the Employment Development Department (EDD) the power to administer enforcement of employer compliance with the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program. Existing law requires EDD to assess a penalty on any eligible employer that fails to make the program available to employees. Existing law makes these provisions operative when the board notifies the Director of Employment Development that enforcement should proceed and the board and the Director of Employment Development agree to a reasonable implementation timeline. This bill would repeal the above provisions. (4) Existing law, the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. Existing law, the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial, medicinal, and adult-use cannabis activities. MAUCRSA generally divides responsibility for the state licensure and regulation of commercial cannabis activity among the Department of Food and Agriculture, the State Department of Public Health, and the Bureau of Cannabis Control, which are generally referred to as licensing authorities. This bill would require the licensing authorities described above to provide specified information regarding licensees to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board upon request by the board. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/29/20 - Chaptered Current pdf June 29, 2020
- Enrolled 06/26/20 - Enrolled pdf June 26, 2020
- Amended 06/22/20 - Amended Senate pdf June 22, 2020
- Amended 06/13/19 - Amended Senate pdf June 13, 2019
- Introduced 12/03/18 - Introduced pdf December 03, 2018
- AB102 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 21, Statutes of 2020.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 4965.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 4954.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 3856.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 24).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (June 19).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 1178.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 15. Page 1032.)
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 59 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 19% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 13 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 11% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 22 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 54 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 16% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 102 do?
- (1) Existing law, the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act, establishes the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program and the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust, a trust consisting of a program fund and an administrative fund with trust moneys that are continuously appropriated and administered by the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board. Existing law requires the Treasurer, on behalf of the board, to appoint an executive director who is not a member of the board and who serves at its pleasure. Existing law requires eligible employers to offer a payroll deposit retirement savings arrangement so that eligible employees may contribute a portion of their salary or wages to a retirement savings program account in the program, as specified. Existing law requires the board to take various actions upon implementation of the program and, for up to 3 years following its initial implementation of the program, requires the board to establish managed accounts invested in United States Treasuries, myRAs, or similar investments. Existing law states that the program is implemented as of January 1, 2017. This bill would rename the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act as the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust Act, the body that administers the act as the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board, and would make conforming changes in this regard. The bill would make various changes in the act to reflect that it has been implemented, including eliminating the requirement to establish managed accounts invested in United States Treasuries, myRAs, or similar investments described above. The bill would authorize the board to delegate rulemaking authority to its executive director. The bill would authorize an employee to opt out of participation in the program by telephone and would eliminate a condition relating to contribution amounts that depends on the length of time that an employee has contributed to the program. The bill would grant the board the power to administer the enforcement of employer compliance, including the power to impose specified penalties on employers who fail to allow eligible employees to participate in the program, subject to an appeals and collections process administered by the Franchise Tax Board, as specified below. (2) Existing law authorizes the collection of various debts by the Franchise Tax Board, including fines, state or local penalties, bail, forfeitures, restitution fines, restitution orders, and other amounts imposed by state courts and delinquent tax debt due. Existing law, the Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal) Act, establishes the FI$Cal system, a single integrated financial management system for the state. This bill would authorize penalties imposed on an employer under the CalSavers Retirement Savers Program for failure to comply with the program to be referred by the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) for collection under guidelines prescribed by the FTB. The bill would require the FTB to establish criteria, including a minimum dollar amount subject to referral and collection. The bill, upon written notice to a noncompliant employer, would treat amounts referred to the FTB as final and payable and would authorize the amounts to be collected from the eligible employer by the FTB in any manner authorized for collection of a delinquent income tax liability, except as specified. The bill would establish specified administrative procedures, including an appeals process. The bill would require amounts collected by the FTB to be transmitted to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board for deposit in the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust or remitted by means of the Fi$Cal system. By authorizing amounts collected by the FTB to be transferred to the board for deposit into the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust, a continuously appropriated trust, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor, except as specified, for the FTB or any deputy, agent, clerk, or other officer or employee of the state who has access to returns, reports, or documents filed under the franchise and income tax laws to disclose information regarding income or particulars from those documents. This bill, notwithstanding that provision, would authorize the FTB to disclose information to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board to facilitate the collection of amounts due and the appeals of the determination of the board, as specified. (3) Existing law grants the Employment Development Department (EDD) the power to administer enforcement of employer compliance with the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program. Existing law requires EDD to assess a penalty on any eligible employer that fails to make the program available to employees. Existing law makes these provisions operative when the board notifies the Director of Employment Development that enforcement should proceed and the board and the Director of Employment Development agree to a reasonable implementation timeline. This bill would repeal the above provisions. (4) Existing law, the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. Existing law, the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial, medicinal, and adult-use cannabis activities. MAUCRSA generally divides responsibility for the state licensure and regulation of commercial cannabis activity among the Department of Food and Agriculture, the State Department of Public Health, and the Bureau of Cannabis Control, which are generally referred to as licensing authorities. This bill would require the licensing authorities described above to provide specified information regarding licensees to the CalSavers Retirement Savings Board upon request by the board. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors AB 102?
- AB 102 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
- What is the current status of AB 102?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 102?
- Track AB 102 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 102
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 102
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →