California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2124 — Guardianships.

Last action — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, under which a minor may be adjudged to be a dependent of the court if the minor has been abused or neglected, as specified. Other existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, authorizes a probate court, upon hearing of a petition by a parent, relative, or other person, to appoint a guardian of a minor in accordance with specified provisions of law governing the custody of a minor child. Existing law authorizes a court hearing a guardianship petition, if the proposed ward is or may be abused or neglected, to refer the matter to the local child welfare services agency to initiate an investigation to determine whether proceedings in juvenile court should be commenced. This bill, except as provided below, would require, rather than authorize, the court to immediately refer the matter to the local child welfare services agency for investigation under those circumstances. The bill would prohibit the guardianship proceedings from being completed until the investigation is completed and a report is provided to the juvenile court. However, the bill would prohibit the probate court from referring the matter to the local child welfare services agency if it finds on the record that the parents, the proposed guardian, and the child, if 12 years of age or older, knowingly and voluntarily consent to the establishment of a guardianship in probate court, unless the probate court determines that the child is at risk of abuse or neglect in the home of the proposed guardian. The bill would require the consent by the parties to be in writing, as specified. Existing law requires a proceeding in the juvenile court to declare a child to be a dependent child of the court to be commenced by a social worker's filing of a petition with the court. Under existing law, if a person applies to a social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings and the social worker fails to file a petition within 3 weeks after the application, the person may, within one month after making the application, apply to the juvenile court to review the decision of the social worker, and the court may either affirm the decision of the social worker or order the social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings. This bill would also require the juvenile court to review the decision of a social worker not to file a petition if the probate court has referred the matter to the juvenile court. The bill would require the court to order the social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings if it appears that the child would be abused or neglected if residing in the home of the parents and the juvenile court appears best able to serve the family and protect the child. The bill would require the court to consider certain factors when making this determination, including whether the parents, child, or caregiver would benefit from support or services, a juvenile court guardianship, or any other child welfare services. Existing law authorizes a juvenile court, if the court finds that the child is abused or neglected, and the parent has advised the court that the parent is not interested in family maintenance or family reunification services, in addition to or in lieu of adjudicating the child a dependent child of the court, to order a legal guardianship and appoint a legal guardian, as specified. Existing law establishes the state-funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) , which provides aid on behalf of eligible children who are placed in the home of a relative guardian. Existing law requires aid in the form of state-funded Kin-GAP to be provided on behalf of any child under 18 years of age and to any eligible youth under 19 years of age who has had a kinship guardianship established, as described above, and who meets other requirements, including that the child or youth has been adjudicated a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, has been residing for at least 6 consecutive months in the approved home of the prospective relative guardian, and has had the dependency jurisdiction or wardship terminated, as specified. This bill would require the state-funded Kin-GAP aid to be provided on behalf of any child under 18 years of age and to any eligible youth under 21 years of age who has had a kinship guardianship established as described above. The bill would, for purposes of providing this aid, eliminate the requirements that the child has also been adjudicated a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, has been residing for at least 6 consecutive months in the approved home of the prospective relative guardian, and has had the dependency jurisdiction or wardship terminated, as specified. The bill would repeal obsolete cross-references and make other technical changes. By imposing a higher level of service on county officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  2. Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  5. Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.

  6. From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.

  7. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

civil-rights labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2124 do?
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, under which a minor may be adjudged to be a dependent of the court if the minor has been abused or neglected, as specified. Other existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, authorizes a probate court, upon hearing of a petition by a parent, relative, or other person, to appoint a guardian of a minor in accordance with specified provisions of law governing the custody of a minor child. Existing law authorizes a court hearing a guardianship petition, if the proposed ward is or may be abused or neglected, to refer the matter to the local child welfare services agency to initiate an investigation to determine whether proceedings in juvenile court should be commenced. This bill, except as provided below, would require, rather than authorize, the court to immediately refer the matter to the local child welfare services agency for investigation under those circumstances. The bill would prohibit the guardianship proceedings from being completed until the investigation is completed and a report is provided to the juvenile court. However, the bill would prohibit the probate court from referring the matter to the local child welfare services agency if it finds on the record that the parents, the proposed guardian, and the child, if 12 years of age or older, knowingly and voluntarily consent to the establishment of a guardianship in probate court, unless the probate court determines that the child is at risk of abuse or neglect in the home of the proposed guardian. The bill would require the consent by the parties to be in writing, as specified. Existing law requires a proceeding in the juvenile court to declare a child to be a dependent child of the court to be commenced by a social worker's filing of a petition with the court. Under existing law, if a person applies to a social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings and the social worker fails to file a petition within 3 weeks after the application, the person may, within one month after making the application, apply to the juvenile court to review the decision of the social worker, and the court may either affirm the decision of the social worker or order the social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings. This bill would also require the juvenile court to review the decision of a social worker not to file a petition if the probate court has referred the matter to the juvenile court. The bill would require the court to order the social worker to commence juvenile court proceedings if it appears that the child would be abused or neglected if residing in the home of the parents and the juvenile court appears best able to serve the family and protect the child. The bill would require the court to consider certain factors when making this determination, including whether the parents, child, or caregiver would benefit from support or services, a juvenile court guardianship, or any other child welfare services. Existing law authorizes a juvenile court, if the court finds that the child is abused or neglected, and the parent has advised the court that the parent is not interested in family maintenance or family reunification services, in addition to or in lieu of adjudicating the child a dependent child of the court, to order a legal guardianship and appoint a legal guardian, as specified. Existing law establishes the state-funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) , which provides aid on behalf of eligible children who are placed in the home of a relative guardian. Existing law requires aid in the form of state-funded Kin-GAP to be provided on behalf of any child under 18 years of age and to any eligible youth under 19 years of age who has had a kinship guardianship established, as described above, and who meets other requirements, including that the child or youth has been adjudicated a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, has been residing for at least 6 consecutive months in the approved home of the prospective relative guardian, and has had the dependency jurisdiction or wardship terminated, as specified. This bill would require the state-funded Kin-GAP aid to be provided on behalf of any child under 18 years of age and to any eligible youth under 21 years of age who has had a kinship guardianship established as described above. The bill would, for purposes of providing this aid, eliminate the requirements that the child has also been adjudicated a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, has been residing for at least 6 consecutive months in the approved home of the prospective relative guardian, and has had the dependency jurisdiction or wardship terminated, as specified. The bill would repeal obsolete cross-references and make other technical changes. By imposing a higher level of service on county officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2124?
AB 2124 is sponsored by Mark Stone.
What is the current status of AB 2124?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2124?
Track AB 2124 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2124

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2124

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →