AB 958 — The California Organic-to-School Pilot Program.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Office of Farm to Fork within the Department of Food and Agriculture, and requires the office, to the extent that resources are available, to work with various entities, including, among others, the agricultural industry and other organizations involved in promoting food access, to increase the amount of agricultural products available to underserved communities and schools in the state. This bill would create the California Organic-to-School Pilot Program, to be administered by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, through the Office of Farm to Fork. The bill would require the secretary to expend moneys allocated for the program to provide grants for school food authorities to purchase California organic food products for school meals, as specified. The bill would require the secretary to consult with the State Department of Education to determine the recipients and amounts of grants awarded under the program. The bill would require a school food authority that receives a grant under the program to submit a report to the secretary containing specified information and would require the secretary to report to the Legislature on the outcomes of the program. The bill would make the implementation of its provisions contingent on a one-time appropriation being made for its purposes by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or another statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/30/19 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 30, 2019
- Amended 04/02/19 - Amended Assembly pdf April 02, 2019
- Introduced 02/21/19 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2019
- AB958 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 24).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry · Primary
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Robert Rivas · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
- Buffy Wicks · Cosponsor
- Wood · Cosponsor
- Blanca E. Rubio · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic
Co-sponsors (8)
- Eggman
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Rivas, Robert Democratic
- Weber
- Wicks, Buffy Democratic
- Wood
- Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 958 do?
- Existing law establishes the Office of Farm to Fork within the Department of Food and Agriculture, and requires the office, to the extent that resources are available, to work with various entities, including, among others, the agricultural industry and other organizations involved in promoting food access, to increase the amount of agricultural products available to underserved communities and schools in the state. This bill would create the California Organic-to-School Pilot Program, to be administered by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, through the Office of Farm to Fork. The bill would require the secretary to expend moneys allocated for the program to provide grants for school food authorities to purchase California organic food products for school meals, as specified. The bill would require the secretary to consult with the State Department of Education to determine the recipients and amounts of grants awarded under the program. The bill would require a school food authority that receives a grant under the program to submit a report to the secretary containing specified information and would require the secretary to report to the Legislature on the outcomes of the program. The bill would make the implementation of its provisions contingent on a one-time appropriation being made for its purposes by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or another statute.
- Who sponsors AB 958?
- AB 958 is sponsored by Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic), Eggman, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Rivas, Robert (Democratic), Weber, Wicks, Buffy (Democratic), Wood, Rubio, Blanca E. (Democratic), and Garcia, Robert (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 958?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 958?
- Track AB 958 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 958
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 958
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →