California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 90 — Transportation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 17, Statutes of 2020.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under the Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act, also known as the Transportation Development Act, revenues from a 1 / 4 % sales tax in each county are transferred to the county's local transportation fund and available, among other things, for allocation by a transportation planning agency to transit operators, subject to certain financial requirements for an operator to meet in order to be eligible to receive funds. Existing law sets forth alternative ways for an operator to qualify for funding, including a standard under which the allocated funds do not exceed 50% of the operator's total operating costs, as specified, or the maintenance by the operator of a specified ratio of fare revenues to operating cost. If an operator was allocated funds from a local transportation fund during a fiscal year in which it did not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost, existing law requires the operator's eligibility to receive these moneys and specified allocations under the State Transit Assistance Program to be reduced during a subsequent penalty year by the amount of the difference between the required fare revenues and the actual fare revenues collected for the fiscal year that the required ratio was not maintained. This bill would prohibit the imposition of this penalty on an operator that does not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost during the 2019–20 or 2020–21 fiscal year. (2) Existing law requires the transfer of a specified portion of the sales tax on diesel fuel, in addition to various other revenues, to the Public Transportation Account, a trust fund in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law requires funds in the account to be allocated for various public transportation and transportation planning purposes, with specified revenues in the account to be allocated by the Controller to specified local transportation agencies for public transportation purposes, pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates a specified portion of the revenues attributable to the sales tax on diesel fuel and various other revenues to the Controller for allocation to each local transportation agency by formulas based 50% on population and 50% on transit operator revenues. Existing law requires each State Transit Assistance-eligible operator within the jurisdiction of the allocating local transportation agency to receive a proportional share of the revenue-based program funds based on the qualifying revenues of that operator, as defined. The bill would require the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and would authorize the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. The bill would require the Controller to use specified data to calculate those individual operator ratios. Upon allocation of the transit operator revenue-based funds to local transportation agencies pursuant to this provision, the bill would require the Controller to publish the amount of funding allocated to each operator. (3) Existing law requires an operator to receive its entire allocation under the State Transit Assistance Program, and authorizes the operator to use any or all of that allocation for operating purposes, if it meets one of 2 specified efficiency standards. If the operator fails to meet either of those efficiency standards, existing law reduces the amount of the operator's allocation available for operating purposes by a specified percentage and requires that amount to be used by the operator for capital purposes. This bill would exempt an operator from meeting either of those efficiency standards for the 2020–21 and 2021–2022 fiscal years and would authorize the operator to use those funds for operating or capital purposes during that period. (4) Existing law imposes a transportation improvement fee under the Vehicle License Fee Law and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation pursuant to the population-based and transit operator revenue-based formulas. This bill would require the Controller to allocate program funding for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years to recipient transit agencies pursuant to the individual operator ratios published in the above-described transmittal memo. (5) Existing law requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected by the State Air Resources Board as part of a market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and to be available upon appropriation. Existing law continuously appropriates specified portions of the annual proceeds in the fund to various programs, including 5% for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program, which provides operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve mobility. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate available program funding to recipient transit agencies on a formula basis, upon approval of the recipient transit agency's proposed expenditures by the Department of Transportation. This bill would require the Controller to allocate Low Carbon Transit Operations Program funding for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years to recipient transit agencies pursuant to the individual operator ratios published in the above-described transmittal memo. (6) Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Existing law requires a seller or person subject to sales and use tax to file, on or before the last day of the month following each quarterly period, a return for the preceding quarterly period. Existing law provides that if the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (the department) finds that a person's failure to make a timely return or payment is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the person's control, and occurred notwithstanding the exercise of ordinary care and the absence of willful neglect, the person shall be relieved of the penalties for failing to file a return. This bill, beginning January 1, 2020, would require an aircraft jet fuel retailer to provide a quarterly information return, as specified, and would subject a retailer who fails to file that information return or who files an inaccurate information return to a penalty of $5,000. The bill would exempt from those penalties a person who files an inaccurate return if that person's failure is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the person's control, notwithstanding the exercise of ordinary care and the absence of willful neglect. The bill would require the department to post specified information from the returns on its internet website, including the amount of reported revenue derived from the sale, storage, use, or consumption of aircraft jet fuel in the state from specified taxes. (7) Existing law creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement an intercity high-speed rail system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law requires the authority to prepare, publish, adopt, and submit to the Legislature a business plan containing specified elements, by May 1, 2014, and every 2 years thereafter, with a draft of the business plan to be available at least 60 days in advance for public review and comment, followed by at least one public hearing. Existing law requires the authority, on or before March 1, 2017, and every 2 years thereafter, to provide a project update report to the Legislature on the development and implementation of intercity high-speed train service, as specified. This bill would delay the due date of the 2020 business plan to December 15, 2020. After the authority publishes the draft of the business plan, the bill would require the authority to submit any update to the draft business plan to a specified peer review group for review before the authority adopts the business plan. The bill would specify that the 2021 project update report is not required. (8) This bill would appropriate $1,705,000 to the Department of Motor Vehicles from the Air Pollution Control Fund to develop the interface system for the department's vehicle registration system to communicate with the State Air Resources Board's compliance database. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 17, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 4961.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 4954.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 3854.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 24).

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. Ordered to third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 19).

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  16. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  18. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 1172.)

  22. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  23. Ordered to second reading.

  24. Withdrawn from committee.

  25. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 15. Page 1032.)

  26. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 58 Yea · 17 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 21001
Unaffiliated 371103
Republican 0600
Total 581704
% of votes cast 73%22%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Smith — Yea
Weber — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Ting — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Fong — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Brough — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Diep — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB90 BUDGET

Passed 29 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19800
Democratic 10000
Republican 0300
Total 291100
% of votes cast 73%28%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Roth — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Monning — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Chang — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Bates — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Borgeas — Nay
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8400
Democratic 5000
Republican 0100
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Monning — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Roth — Yea
Pan — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 11001
Democratic 2003
Total 14004
% of votes cast 78%0%0%22%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Monning — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 54 Yea · 13 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32808
Democratic 22102
Republican 0403
Total 5413013
% of votes cast 68%16%0%16%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Brough — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
Chiu — Not Voting
Levine — Not Voting
Cooley — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Diep — Not Voting
Low — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Not Voting
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 90 do?
(1) Under the Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act, also known as the Transportation Development Act, revenues from a 1 / 4 % sales tax in each county are transferred to the county's local transportation fund and available, among other things, for allocation by a transportation planning agency to transit operators, subject to certain financial requirements for an operator to meet in order to be eligible to receive funds. Existing law sets forth alternative ways for an operator to qualify for funding, including a standard under which the allocated funds do not exceed 50% of the operator's total operating costs, as specified, or the maintenance by the operator of a specified ratio of fare revenues to operating cost. If an operator was allocated funds from a local transportation fund during a fiscal year in which it did not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost, existing law requires the operator's eligibility to receive these moneys and specified allocations under the State Transit Assistance Program to be reduced during a subsequent penalty year by the amount of the difference between the required fare revenues and the actual fare revenues collected for the fiscal year that the required ratio was not maintained. This bill would prohibit the imposition of this penalty on an operator that does not maintain the required ratio of fare revenues to operating cost during the 2019–20 or 2020–21 fiscal year. (2) Existing law requires the transfer of a specified portion of the sales tax on diesel fuel, in addition to various other revenues, to the Public Transportation Account, a trust fund in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law requires funds in the account to be allocated for various public transportation and transportation planning purposes, with specified revenues in the account to be allocated by the Controller to specified local transportation agencies for public transportation purposes, pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates a specified portion of the revenues attributable to the sales tax on diesel fuel and various other revenues to the Controller for allocation to each local transportation agency by formulas based 50% on population and 50% on transit operator revenues. Existing law requires each State Transit Assistance-eligible operator within the jurisdiction of the allocating local transportation agency to receive a proportional share of the revenue-based program funds based on the qualifying revenues of that operator, as defined. The bill would require the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and would authorize the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. The bill would require the Controller to use specified data to calculate those individual operator ratios. Upon allocation of the transit operator revenue-based funds to local transportation agencies pursuant to this provision, the bill would require the Controller to publish the amount of funding allocated to each operator. (3) Existing law requires an operator to receive its entire allocation under the State Transit Assistance Program, and authorizes the operator to use any or all of that allocation for operating purposes, if it meets one of 2 specified efficiency standards. If the operator fails to meet either of those efficiency standards, existing law reduces the amount of the operator's allocation available for operating purposes by a specified percentage and requires that amount to be used by the operator for capital purposes. This bill would exempt an operator from meeting either of those efficiency standards for the 2020–21 and 2021–2022 fiscal years and would authorize the operator to use those funds for operating or capital purposes during that period. (4) Existing law imposes a transportation improvement fee under the Vehicle License Fee Law and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation pursuant to the population-based and transit operator revenue-based formulas. This bill would require the Controller to allocate program funding for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years to recipient transit agencies pursuant to the individual operator ratios published in the above-described transmittal memo. (5) Existing law requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected by the State Air Resources Board as part of a market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and to be available upon appropriation. Existing law continuously appropriates specified portions of the annual proceeds in the fund to various programs, including 5% for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program, which provides operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve mobility. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate available program funding to recipient transit agencies on a formula basis, upon approval of the recipient transit agency's proposed expenditures by the Department of Transportation. This bill would require the Controller to allocate Low Carbon Transit Operations Program funding for the 2020–21 and 2021–22 fiscal years to recipient transit agencies pursuant to the individual operator ratios published in the above-described transmittal memo. (6) Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Existing law requires a seller or person subject to sales and use tax to file, on or before the last day of the month following each quarterly period, a return for the preceding quarterly period. Existing law provides that if the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (the department) finds that a person's failure to make a timely return or payment is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the person's control, and occurred notwithstanding the exercise of ordinary care and the absence of willful neglect, the person shall be relieved of the penalties for failing to file a return. This bill, beginning January 1, 2020, would require an aircraft jet fuel retailer to provide a quarterly information return, as specified, and would subject a retailer who fails to file that information return or who files an inaccurate information return to a penalty of $5,000. The bill would exempt from those penalties a person who files an inaccurate return if that person's failure is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the person's control, notwithstanding the exercise of ordinary care and the absence of willful neglect. The bill would require the department to post specified information from the returns on its internet website, including the amount of reported revenue derived from the sale, storage, use, or consumption of aircraft jet fuel in the state from specified taxes. (7) Existing law creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement an intercity high-speed rail system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law requires the authority to prepare, publish, adopt, and submit to the Legislature a business plan containing specified elements, by May 1, 2014, and every 2 years thereafter, with a draft of the business plan to be available at least 60 days in advance for public review and comment, followed by at least one public hearing. Existing law requires the authority, on or before March 1, 2017, and every 2 years thereafter, to provide a project update report to the Legislature on the development and implementation of intercity high-speed train service, as specified. This bill would delay the due date of the 2020 business plan to December 15, 2020. After the authority publishes the draft of the business plan, the bill would require the authority to submit any update to the draft business plan to a specified peer review group for review before the authority adopts the business plan. The bill would specify that the 2021 project update report is not required. (8) This bill would appropriate $1,705,000 to the Department of Motor Vehicles from the Air Pollution Control Fund to develop the interface system for the department's vehicle registration system to communicate with the State Air Resources Board's compliance database. (9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 90?
AB 90 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 90?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 90?
Track AB 90 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 90

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 90

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →