California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 81 — Public health funding: health facilities and services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2020.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. Existing law requires that the fee be based on the entire net revenue of all skilled nursing facilities subject to the fee. Existing law prohibits the fee from being assessed after July 31, 2020, and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the Director of Health Care Services to promulgate regulations on these provisions, and to implement these provisions by provider bulletin or similar instruction so long as that guidance remains in effect only until July 31, 2020, and that regulations are adopted by that date. Existing law requires the department to request approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to implement these provisions, and authorizes the director to alter the methodology, to the extent necessary to meet the requirements of federal law or regulations or to obtain federal approval. This bill would establish various enforcement mechanisms for the department to collect delinquent quality assurance fees, such as requiring the department to assess interest on a skilled nursing facility that fails to pay all or part of the quality assurance fee within 60 days of the date that payment is due, beginning on the 61st calendar day from the date the payment is due, until the unpaid amount due and any interest is paid in full, and authorizing the department to deduct unpaid assessments, including any interest and penalties owed, attributable to a debtor facility from any Medi-Cal payments made to a related facility or entity by common ownership or control to the debtor facility. In the event of a merger, acquisition, or change of ownership involving a skilled nursing facility, this bill would authorize the department to delay approval of a new Medi-Cal provider agreement or a transfer of an existing Medi-Cal provider agreement to a successor skilled nursing facility until the full amount of the quality assurance fees, penalties, and interest owed by the successor or previous facility owner is recovered in full, to take specified action as a condition of approving a new Medi-Cal provider agreement or a transfer of an existing Medi-Cal provider agreement to a successor skilled nursing facility, and to waive a portion or all of the interest or penalties, or interest or penalties assessed if the department determines that the facility has demonstrated that imposing the full amount of fees has a high likelihood of creating an undue financial hardship for the facility or creates a significant financial difficulty in providing services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. The bill would extend the department's imposition of a uniform quality assurance fee to December 31, 2022, and would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, the Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Reimbursement Act, requires the department to implement a facility-specific reimbursement ratesetting system for certain skilled nursing facilities. Reimbursement rates for freestanding skilled nursing facilities are funded by a combination of federal funds and moneys collected pursuant to the skilled nursing uniform quality assurance fee. Existing law also establishes the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund in the State Treasury, which is a continuously appropriated fund that contains moneys from the assessment of specified administrative penalties and set asides of General Fund moneys, for the purposes of making quality and accountability payments, including supplemental payments. Under the act, the department is required to develop the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Supplemental Payment System (system) , which is utilized to provide supplemental payments to skilled nursing facilities that improve the quality and accountability of care rendered to residents in skilled nursing facilities, and to penalize those facilities that do not meet measurable standards. Under existing law, the rate methodology becomes inoperative after July 31, 2020, and these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the director to promulgate regulations on these provisions, and to implement these provisions by provider bulletin or similar instruction so long as that guidance remains in effect only until July 31, 2020, and that regulations are adopted by that date. This bill would make various changes to the act, including providing that special program services for the mentally disordered that are entitled to receive supplemental payment are exempt from the system. The bill would extend the department's use of the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund to December 31, 2022. The bill would modify parameters of the supplemental payment, and would cease the availability of those payments on January 1, 2023. The bill would require the department to convene a stakeholder process by September 1, 2021 to develop a successor supplemental payment or similar quality-based payment methodology to replace the supplemental payments, starting in calendar year 2023. The bill would make various changes to the Medi-Cal rate reimbursement methodology, including that the reimbursement rates established for the rate period of August 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, inclusive, be no less than the amounts that would otherwise have been established under the reimbursement methodology for the 2019–20 rate year, and that the weighted average Medi-Cal reimbursement rate increase not exceed the applicable federal upper payment limit. The bill would also exempt a unit that provides freestanding pediatric subacute care services in a skilled nursing facility from the quality assurance fee requirements for that rate period and every subsequent calendar year thereafter. The bill would establish annual aggregate rate increases for the 2020 to 2024, inclusive, calendar years, as prescribed, and set forth the annual rate methodologies. The bill would authorize the department to modify any methodology or other provision regarding the reimbursement methodology, to the extent it deems necessary to meet the requirements of federal law or regulations, to obtain or maintain federal approval, or to ensure federal financial participation is available or is not otherwise jeopardized. Before implementing a modification, the bill would require the department to consult with affected providers and stakeholders to the extent practicable, and to notify affected providers, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature within 10 business days of that modification. The bill would require the department to audit the costs and revenues of skilled nursing facilities that are associated with the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, as determined by the department, to determine whether a skilled nursing facility has adequately used increased Medicaid payments associated with the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, as specified, for only allowable costs. The bill would implement the auditing requirement only to the extent any necessary federal approvals are obtained, and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized. The bill would extend the operative date of the act to December 31, 2022, and would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2024. By extending the period of time during which moneys are deposited in the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) , an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF) , a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including children's mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, and prevention and early intervention programs. Existing law requires funds, other than those placed in a prudent reserve, to revert to the state if the funds have not been spent or encumbered within 3 years. This bill would authorize the State Department of Health Care Services to allow counties to determine the percentage of funds to allocate across specified mental health programs for the 2020–21 fiscal year by means of all-county letters or other similar instructions without taking any further regulatory action. The bill would amend the MHSA by making funds that are subject to reversion as of July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020, instead subject to reversion as of July 1, 2021. The MHSA established the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission and requires the counties to prepare and submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan, and annual updates, as specified, to the commission and the department. This bill would authorize a county that is unable to complete and submit a 3-year plan or annual update for the 2020–21 fiscal year due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency to extend the effective timeframe of its currently approved 3-year plan or annual update to include the 2020–21 fiscal year. The bill would require a county to submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan or annual update to the commission and the department by July 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the MHSA to be amended by a 2/3 vote of each house of the Legislature if the amendments are consistent with, and further the intent of, the MHSA. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to add provisions to the act to clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would state the finding of the Legislature that the changes made are consistent with, and further the purposes of, the MHSA. (4) Existing law requires a county to establish and maintain a prudent reserve as part of the 3-year plan to ensure the county program will continue to be able to serve children, adults, and seniors, as specified, and requires the county to allocate funds from the reserve for services in years when the allocation of funds for services are not adequate to serve the same number of individuals as the county had served in the previous fiscal year. This bill would specify that a county may, during the 2020–21 fiscal year, use funds from its prudent reserve for specified services to persons who are served by the MHSA, including housing assistance. (5) This bill would state that its provisions are severable. (6) This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 10. Page 4958.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 4954.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 11. Page 3852.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 24).

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. Ordered to third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 19).

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  17. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  18. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 1168.)

  22. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  23. Ordered to second reading.

  24. Withdrawn from committee.

  25. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 15. Page 1032.)

  26. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 59 Yea · 10 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 19003
Unaffiliated 38706
Republican 2301
Total 5910010
% of votes cast 75%13%0%13%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Weber — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Ting — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Fong — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Brough — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Smith — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Diep — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Not Voting
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB81 BUDGET

Passed 28 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 9001
Unaffiliated 19800
Republican 0300
Total 281101
% of votes cast 70%28%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Roth — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Monning — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Chang — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Bates — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Borgeas — Nay
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Not Voting
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8400
Democratic 5000
Republican 0100
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Monning — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Roth — Yea
Pan — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 9003
Democratic 2003
Total 12006
% of votes cast 67%0%0%33%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Not Voting
Roth — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Not Voting
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 54 Yea · 13 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32808
Democratic 22102
Republican 0403
Total 5413013
% of votes cast 68%16%0%16%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Brough — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
Chiu — Not Voting
Levine — Not Voting
Cooley — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Diep — Not Voting
Low — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Not Voting
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 81 do?
(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. Existing law requires that the fee be based on the entire net revenue of all skilled nursing facilities subject to the fee. Existing law prohibits the fee from being assessed after July 31, 2020, and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the Director of Health Care Services to promulgate regulations on these provisions, and to implement these provisions by provider bulletin or similar instruction so long as that guidance remains in effect only until July 31, 2020, and that regulations are adopted by that date. Existing law requires the department to request approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to implement these provisions, and authorizes the director to alter the methodology, to the extent necessary to meet the requirements of federal law or regulations or to obtain federal approval. This bill would establish various enforcement mechanisms for the department to collect delinquent quality assurance fees, such as requiring the department to assess interest on a skilled nursing facility that fails to pay all or part of the quality assurance fee within 60 days of the date that payment is due, beginning on the 61st calendar day from the date the payment is due, until the unpaid amount due and any interest is paid in full, and authorizing the department to deduct unpaid assessments, including any interest and penalties owed, attributable to a debtor facility from any Medi-Cal payments made to a related facility or entity by common ownership or control to the debtor facility. In the event of a merger, acquisition, or change of ownership involving a skilled nursing facility, this bill would authorize the department to delay approval of a new Medi-Cal provider agreement or a transfer of an existing Medi-Cal provider agreement to a successor skilled nursing facility until the full amount of the quality assurance fees, penalties, and interest owed by the successor or previous facility owner is recovered in full, to take specified action as a condition of approving a new Medi-Cal provider agreement or a transfer of an existing Medi-Cal provider agreement to a successor skilled nursing facility, and to waive a portion or all of the interest or penalties, or interest or penalties assessed if the department determines that the facility has demonstrated that imposing the full amount of fees has a high likelihood of creating an undue financial hardship for the facility or creates a significant financial difficulty in providing services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. The bill would extend the department's imposition of a uniform quality assurance fee to December 31, 2022, and would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2024. (2) Existing law, the Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Reimbursement Act, requires the department to implement a facility-specific reimbursement ratesetting system for certain skilled nursing facilities. Reimbursement rates for freestanding skilled nursing facilities are funded by a combination of federal funds and moneys collected pursuant to the skilled nursing uniform quality assurance fee. Existing law also establishes the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund in the State Treasury, which is a continuously appropriated fund that contains moneys from the assessment of specified administrative penalties and set asides of General Fund moneys, for the purposes of making quality and accountability payments, including supplemental payments. Under the act, the department is required to develop the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Supplemental Payment System (system) , which is utilized to provide supplemental payments to skilled nursing facilities that improve the quality and accountability of care rendered to residents in skilled nursing facilities, and to penalize those facilities that do not meet measurable standards. Under existing law, the rate methodology becomes inoperative after July 31, 2020, and these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the director to promulgate regulations on these provisions, and to implement these provisions by provider bulletin or similar instruction so long as that guidance remains in effect only until July 31, 2020, and that regulations are adopted by that date. This bill would make various changes to the act, including providing that special program services for the mentally disordered that are entitled to receive supplemental payment are exempt from the system. The bill would extend the department's use of the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund to December 31, 2022. The bill would modify parameters of the supplemental payment, and would cease the availability of those payments on January 1, 2023. The bill would require the department to convene a stakeholder process by September 1, 2021 to develop a successor supplemental payment or similar quality-based payment methodology to replace the supplemental payments, starting in calendar year 2023. The bill would make various changes to the Medi-Cal rate reimbursement methodology, including that the reimbursement rates established for the rate period of August 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, inclusive, be no less than the amounts that would otherwise have been established under the reimbursement methodology for the 2019–20 rate year, and that the weighted average Medi-Cal reimbursement rate increase not exceed the applicable federal upper payment limit. The bill would also exempt a unit that provides freestanding pediatric subacute care services in a skilled nursing facility from the quality assurance fee requirements for that rate period and every subsequent calendar year thereafter. The bill would establish annual aggregate rate increases for the 2020 to 2024, inclusive, calendar years, as prescribed, and set forth the annual rate methodologies. The bill would authorize the department to modify any methodology or other provision regarding the reimbursement methodology, to the extent it deems necessary to meet the requirements of federal law or regulations, to obtain or maintain federal approval, or to ensure federal financial participation is available or is not otherwise jeopardized. Before implementing a modification, the bill would require the department to consult with affected providers and stakeholders to the extent practicable, and to notify affected providers, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature within 10 business days of that modification. The bill would require the department to audit the costs and revenues of skilled nursing facilities that are associated with the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, as determined by the department, to determine whether a skilled nursing facility has adequately used increased Medicaid payments associated with the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, as specified, for only allowable costs. The bill would implement the auditing requirement only to the extent any necessary federal approvals are obtained, and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized. The bill would extend the operative date of the act to December 31, 2022, and would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2024. By extending the period of time during which moneys are deposited in the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) , an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF) , a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including children's mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, and prevention and early intervention programs. Existing law requires funds, other than those placed in a prudent reserve, to revert to the state if the funds have not been spent or encumbered within 3 years. This bill would authorize the State Department of Health Care Services to allow counties to determine the percentage of funds to allocate across specified mental health programs for the 2020–21 fiscal year by means of all-county letters or other similar instructions without taking any further regulatory action. The bill would amend the MHSA by making funds that are subject to reversion as of July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020, instead subject to reversion as of July 1, 2021. The MHSA established the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission and requires the counties to prepare and submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan, and annual updates, as specified, to the commission and the department. This bill would authorize a county that is unable to complete and submit a 3-year plan or annual update for the 2020–21 fiscal year due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency to extend the effective timeframe of its currently approved 3-year plan or annual update to include the 2020–21 fiscal year. The bill would require a county to submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan or annual update to the commission and the department by July 1, 2021. Existing law authorizes the MHSA to be amended by a 2/3 vote of each house of the Legislature if the amendments are consistent with, and further the intent of, the MHSA. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to add provisions to the act to clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would state the finding of the Legislature that the changes made are consistent with, and further the purposes of, the MHSA. (4) Existing law requires a county to establish and maintain a prudent reserve as part of the 3-year plan to ensure the county program will continue to be able to serve children, adults, and seniors, as specified, and requires the county to allocate funds from the reserve for services in years when the allocation of funds for services are not adequate to serve the same number of individuals as the county had served in the previous fiscal year. This bill would specify that a county may, during the 2020–21 fiscal year, use funds from its prudent reserve for specified services to persons who are served by the MHSA, including housing assistance. (5) This bill would state that its provisions are severable. (6) This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 81?
AB 81 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 81?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 81?
Track AB 81 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 81

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 81

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →