California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 2303 — Resource conservation districts.

Last action — Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district to be formed, as provided, for the control of runoff, the prevention or control of soil erosion, the development and distribution of water, and the improvement of land capabilities. Existing law authorizes a proposal to form a resource conservation district by a petition of registered voters or by the adoption of a resolution of application. Existing law authorizes a county, pursuant to a resolution adopted by a its board of supervisors, to lend any of its available funds to specified districts, including recreation and park districts, as provided. This bill would also authorize a county to lend available funds to a resource conservation district, as provided. (2) Existing law establishes the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, otherwise known as the Williamson Act, and authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation, as specified. Existing law authorizes the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract under certain circumstances, and authorizes the city or county to charge a cancellation fee, as provided. Existing law requires these cancellation fees to be transmitted by the county treasurer to the Controller upon collection, and specifies that those cancellation fees are to be deposited in the General Fund, except for the first $5,000,000 of those cancellation fees in the 2004–05 fiscal year and any other amount as approved in the final Budget Act for each fiscal year thereafter, which are required to be deposited in the Soil Conservation Fund to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support, among other things, a specified soil conservation program and the costs to the Department of Conservation for administering specified provisions of the act pertaining to identifying structures that constitute material breaches of contract and providing an alternate remedy to a contract cancellation petition of the landowner. Instead of making cancellation fee moneys in that fund available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support that soil conservation program and the costs to the department for administering those provisions pertaining to identifying structures that constitute material breaches of contract and providing an alternative remedy to a contract cancellation petition of the landowner, this bill would make that cancellation fee moneys in that fund available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support costs of the Director of Conservation to carry out certain powers and duties. (3) Existing law establishes the State Resource Conservation Commission and the Division of Resource Conservation in the Department of Conservation and prescribes the powers and duties of the commission and the division with regard to the implementation of resource conservation services and programs. Existing law requires the Chief of the Division of Resource Conservation to assist in the formation, organization, and operation of resource conservation districts, as provided. This bill would, among other things, abolish the State Resource Conservation Commission and the Division of Resource Conservation. The bill would authorize the Director of Conservation to have powers and duties pertaining to resource conservation activities and programs, including providing specified funding. The bill would require a resource conservation district to be certified by the department as meeting specified criteria in order to be eligible for this funding. The bill would require the department to, on or before December 31 of each year, to post on its internet website a list of resource conservation districts that have been certified. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the bill would authorize a state agency to enter into an interagency agreement with a resource conservation district for the district to provide conservation services, as specified. The bill would provide grants and other forms of local assistance to resource conservation districts meeting certain requirements. The bill would make conforming changes. (4) Existing law authorizes resource conservation districts to develop districtwide comprehensive annual and long-range work plans to address the full range of soil and related resource problems. Existing law prescribes various requirements for the contents of the plans and reports and when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided. This bill would instead authorize each district to develop a long-range work plan, annual work plan, and annual district report to address the full range of projects that protect, conserve, restore, or enhance natural resources, or improve or enhance adaptation or resilience to climate change, or mitigate or sequester carbon emissions on natural lands and working lands, as defined, as provided. The bill would require districts that prepare long-range work plans and annual work plans to provide, for information purposes only, long-range work plans and annual work plans and updates to these plans to the boards of supervisors of every county with land in the district's jurisdiction, as provided. The bill would update the dates when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided, among other things.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  3. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  4. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  5. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

environment agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2303 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes a resource conservation district to be formed, as provided, for the control of runoff, the prevention or control of soil erosion, the development and distribution of water, and the improvement of land capabilities. Existing law authorizes a proposal to form a resource conservation district by a petition of registered voters or by the adoption of a resolution of application. Existing law authorizes a county, pursuant to a resolution adopted by a its board of supervisors, to lend any of its available funds to specified districts, including recreation and park districts, as provided. This bill would also authorize a county to lend available funds to a resource conservation district, as provided. (2) Existing law establishes the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, otherwise known as the Williamson Act, and authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation, as specified. Existing law authorizes the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract under certain circumstances, and authorizes the city or county to charge a cancellation fee, as provided. Existing law requires these cancellation fees to be transmitted by the county treasurer to the Controller upon collection, and specifies that those cancellation fees are to be deposited in the General Fund, except for the first $5,000,000 of those cancellation fees in the 2004–05 fiscal year and any other amount as approved in the final Budget Act for each fiscal year thereafter, which are required to be deposited in the Soil Conservation Fund to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support, among other things, a specified soil conservation program and the costs to the Department of Conservation for administering specified provisions of the act pertaining to identifying structures that constitute material breaches of contract and providing an alternate remedy to a contract cancellation petition of the landowner. Instead of making cancellation fee moneys in that fund available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support that soil conservation program and the costs to the department for administering those provisions pertaining to identifying structures that constitute material breaches of contract and providing an alternative remedy to a contract cancellation petition of the landowner, this bill would make that cancellation fee moneys in that fund available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support costs of the Director of Conservation to carry out certain powers and duties. (3) Existing law establishes the State Resource Conservation Commission and the Division of Resource Conservation in the Department of Conservation and prescribes the powers and duties of the commission and the division with regard to the implementation of resource conservation services and programs. Existing law requires the Chief of the Division of Resource Conservation to assist in the formation, organization, and operation of resource conservation districts, as provided. This bill would, among other things, abolish the State Resource Conservation Commission and the Division of Resource Conservation. The bill would authorize the Director of Conservation to have powers and duties pertaining to resource conservation activities and programs, including providing specified funding. The bill would require a resource conservation district to be certified by the department as meeting specified criteria in order to be eligible for this funding. The bill would require the department to, on or before December 31 of each year, to post on its internet website a list of resource conservation districts that have been certified. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the bill would authorize a state agency to enter into an interagency agreement with a resource conservation district for the district to provide conservation services, as specified. The bill would provide grants and other forms of local assistance to resource conservation districts meeting certain requirements. The bill would make conforming changes. (4) Existing law authorizes resource conservation districts to develop districtwide comprehensive annual and long-range work plans to address the full range of soil and related resource problems. Existing law prescribes various requirements for the contents of the plans and reports and when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided. This bill would instead authorize each district to develop a long-range work plan, annual work plan, and annual district report to address the full range of projects that protect, conserve, restore, or enhance natural resources, or improve or enhance adaptation or resilience to climate change, or mitigate or sequester carbon emissions on natural lands and working lands, as defined, as provided. The bill would require districts that prepare long-range work plans and annual work plans to provide, for information purposes only, long-range work plans and annual work plans and updates to these plans to the boards of supervisors of every county with land in the district's jurisdiction, as provided. The bill would update the dates when specified plans and reports are required to be adopted or completed, as provided, among other things.
Who sponsors AB 2303?
AB 2303 is sponsored by Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2303?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2303?
Track AB 2303 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2303

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2303

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →