California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 1182 — Post-release supervision of offenders.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were not imprisoned for a violent felony, a serious felony, or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole for a period of 6 months, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person is to be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days and have not committed any new offenses. The bill would require those persons, if they have not been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person be retained. Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a serious felony or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole continuously for one year since release from confinement, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person is to be retained. The bill would require those persons, if they have not been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for one year, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a violent felony, and who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years and have been on parole continuously for 2 years since release from confinement, or who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years and have been on parole continuously for 3 years since release from confinement, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person is to be retained. Existing law requires that a person who has been released to county postrelease supervision, that has been on postrelease supervision for 6 consecutive months without a violation of their conditions of postrelease supervision, may be considered for discharge. This bill would instead require those persons to be reviewed and considered for discharge. This bill would additionally define "good cause" for these purposes. The bill would require the department or the county agency responsible for postrelease supervision, when good cause is found, to draft and adopt a supervision plan to address the issues that gave rise to the good cause finding, as specified. By imposing additional duties on a county agency, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  8. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1182 do?
Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were not imprisoned for a violent felony, a serious felony, or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole for a period of 6 months, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person is to be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days and have not committed any new offenses. The bill would require those persons, if they have not been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person be retained. Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a serious felony or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole continuously for one year since release from confinement, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person is to be retained. The bill would require those persons, if they have not been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for one year, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a violent felony, and who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years and have been on parole continuously for 2 years since release from confinement, or who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years and have been on parole continuously for 3 years since release from confinement, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person be retained. This bill would instead require those persons, if they have been scored as low or moderate risk by the department's risk assessment tool, to be released if they have been on parole continuously for 180 days, have been compliant with the terms and conditions of their parole, and have not committed any new offenses, unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation determines, for good cause, that the person is to be retained. Existing law requires that a person who has been released to county postrelease supervision, that has been on postrelease supervision for 6 consecutive months without a violation of their conditions of postrelease supervision, may be considered for discharge. This bill would instead require those persons to be reviewed and considered for discharge. This bill would additionally define "good cause" for these purposes. The bill would require the department or the county agency responsible for postrelease supervision, when good cause is found, to draft and adopt a supervision plan to address the issues that gave rise to the good cause finding, as specified. By imposing additional duties on a county agency, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 1182?
AB 1182 is sponsored by Carrillo, Juan (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 1182?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1182?
Track AB 1182 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1182

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1182

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →