California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 908 — Debt collectors: licensing and regulation: Debt Collection Licensing Act.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and defines "consumer debt" and "consumer credit" for purposes of that act. This bill would include placing a telephone call without disclosing the caller's identity, as specified, and sending digital or written communications that do not display the license number of the debt collector in at least 12-point type as prohibited debt collection practices. Existing law establishes the Department of Business Oversight headed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, who, among other things, generally provides for licensure and regulation of persons who are engaged in various consumer financial businesses. This bill would enact the Debt Collection Licensing Act which would, beginning on January 1, 2022, provide for licensure, regulation, and oversight of debt collectors by the commissioner, define terms for its purposes, and make other conforming changes. The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the business of debt collecting in this state without a license and would also require the person to comply with reporting, examination, and other oversight by the commissioner. The bill would require a person applying for a license to, among other things, pay an application fee, sign the application under penalty of perjury, and submit to a criminal background check by the Department of Justice. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require each licensee to, among other things, file reports with the commissioner under oath, maintain a surety bond, and pay to the commissioner its pro rata share of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred in the administration of these provisions, as estimated by the commissioner. The bill would authorize the commissioner to enforce these provisions by, among other things, adopting regulations, performing investigations, suspending a license, issuing orders and claims for relief, and enforcing the provisions, as specified. This bill would authorize the commissioner to use the authority to issue orders and claims for relief in connection with a violation of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or provisions regulating debt buyers, by insured depository institutions and persons who are licensed and regulated pursuant to various provisions of law, including the California Financing Law, the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act, and the Real Estate Law, as specified. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2021, require the commissioner to take all action necessary in order to be prepared to perform these duties commencing January 1, 2022, including, but not limited to, the adoption of necessary regulations. The bill would prohibit the public disclosure of specific information provided by a licensee to the commissioner. The bill would establish the Debt Collection Advisory Committee, consisting of 7 members appointed by the commissioner, within the Department of Business Oversight to advise the commissioner on matters relating to debt collection, as specified. (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 4.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 53. Noes 19. Page 5411.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 20).

  10. August 18 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (August 12).

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

  14. July 27 hearing postponed by committee.

  15. Referred to Com. on B. & F.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 4. Page 3863.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3767.) (June 18).

  21. June 18 hearing: Reconsideration granted.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3766.) (June 18).

  23. Set for hearing June 18.

  24. June 9 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  25. Set for hearing June 9.

  26. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3559.) (May 19).

  28. Referral to Com. on JUD. rescinded due to the shortened 2020 Legislative Calendar.

  29. Set for hearing May 19.

  30. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.

  31. April 1 hearing postponed by committee.

  32. Set for hearing April 1.

  33. Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.

  34. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wieckowski · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wieckowski

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 53 Yea · 19 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 341304
Democratic 19003
Republican 0600
Total 531907
% of votes cast 67%24%0%9%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Daly — Yea
Ting — Yea
Levine — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Burke — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Weber — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gloria — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chu — Yea
Low — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Diep — Nay
Salas — Nay
Gray — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Fong — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Brough — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Cooper — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 31 Yea · 4 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21303
Democratic 10000
Republican 0102
Total 31405
% of votes cast 78%10%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Pan — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Monning — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hill — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chang — Not Voting
Borgeas — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 7400
Republican 0100
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Quirk — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Fong — Nay
Diep — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5000
Unaffiliated 4200
Republican 0100
Total 9300
% of votes cast 75%25%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Weber — Yea
Burke — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Fong — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 29 Yea · 4 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20304
Democratic 9001
Republican 0102
Total 29407
% of votes cast 73%10%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Roth — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Monning — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Chang — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Borgeas — Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Republican 0100
Total 6100
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hill — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 6000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Hill — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 908 do?
(1) Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and defines "consumer debt" and "consumer credit" for purposes of that act. This bill would include placing a telephone call without disclosing the caller's identity, as specified, and sending digital or written communications that do not display the license number of the debt collector in at least 12-point type as prohibited debt collection practices. Existing law establishes the Department of Business Oversight headed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, who, among other things, generally provides for licensure and regulation of persons who are engaged in various consumer financial businesses. This bill would enact the Debt Collection Licensing Act which would, beginning on January 1, 2022, provide for licensure, regulation, and oversight of debt collectors by the commissioner, define terms for its purposes, and make other conforming changes. The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the business of debt collecting in this state without a license and would also require the person to comply with reporting, examination, and other oversight by the commissioner. The bill would require a person applying for a license to, among other things, pay an application fee, sign the application under penalty of perjury, and submit to a criminal background check by the Department of Justice. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require each licensee to, among other things, file reports with the commissioner under oath, maintain a surety bond, and pay to the commissioner its pro rata share of all costs and expenses reasonably incurred in the administration of these provisions, as estimated by the commissioner. The bill would authorize the commissioner to enforce these provisions by, among other things, adopting regulations, performing investigations, suspending a license, issuing orders and claims for relief, and enforcing the provisions, as specified. This bill would authorize the commissioner to use the authority to issue orders and claims for relief in connection with a violation of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or provisions regulating debt buyers, by insured depository institutions and persons who are licensed and regulated pursuant to various provisions of law, including the California Financing Law, the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act, and the Real Estate Law, as specified. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2021, require the commissioner to take all action necessary in order to be prepared to perform these duties commencing January 1, 2022, including, but not limited to, the adoption of necessary regulations. The bill would prohibit the public disclosure of specific information provided by a licensee to the commissioner. The bill would establish the Debt Collection Advisory Committee, consisting of 7 members appointed by the commissioner, within the Department of Business Oversight to advise the commissioner on matters relating to debt collection, as specified. (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 908?
SB 908 is sponsored by Wieckowski.
What is the current status of SB 908?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 908?
Track SB 908 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 908

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 908

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →