Transportation improvement fee: revenue bonds.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1351 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1351.
You're tracking SB 1351
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1351 — Transportation improvement fee: revenue bonds.
Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program to address deferred maintenance on the state highway system and the local street and road system. Existing law provides for the deposit of various revenues for the program in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account, including specified portions of revenues from certain fuel excise taxes, a road improvement fee imposed on certain zero-emission vehicles, and the transportation improvement fee. Existing law imposes the transportation improvement fee under the Vehicle License Fee Law with a varying fee between $25 and $175 based on vehicle value and an inflation adjustment, and requires the fee to be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the vehicle registration fee. Existing law requires revenues in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to be annually allocated by first making specified deductions for various specified purposes and then continuously appropriating the remaining revenues in the account 50% for allocation to the Department of Transportation for maintenance of the state highway system or for the State Highway Operation and Protection Program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. This bill would create the Transportation Improvement Fee Subaccount in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account and would transfer the revenues from the transportation improvement fee that are deposited in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the subaccount. The bill would continuously appropriate the revenues in the subaccount to the department and cities and counties as part of the same appropriation made to those entities from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account. The bill would prohibit the revenues in the subaccount from being used to satisfy the above-described deductions from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account, except under specified circumstances. The bill would require the revenues in the subaccount to be used first to satisfy the 50% allocation to the department and would require those revenues to be deposited in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account, which the bill would create in the State Transportation Fund. This bill would continuously appropriate the amounts deposited in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account and pledged by the Transportation Improvement Fee Finance Committee, as specified below, to the Treasurer for the purposes of issuing revenue bonds, as specified, and the amounts that have not been pledged by the committee would be continuously appropriated to the department for the purposes of the maintenance of the state highway system or the State Highway Operation and Protection Program, subject to the terms of the issuing instrument for any outstanding revenue bonds. This bill would create the Transportation Improvement Fee Finance Committee, consisting of specified state officers, solely for the purpose of authorizing the issuance and sale of the above-described revenue bonds and the execution and delivery of ancillary obligations, and executing and entering into an issuing instrument. The bill would authorize the committee, in order to provide security for the revenue bonds and ancillary obligations, to include provisions in an issuing instrument pledging the interests of the state in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account to the payment of the revenue bonds and the payment of ancillary obligations. This bill would authorize the department to designate projects to be funded from the proceeds of revenue bonds that are included in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program adopted by the California Transportation Commission on May 13, 2020, and that have completed environmental clearance and project design. The bill would authorize the department to request the committee to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds to provide funds for the designated projects. This bill would permit the committee to authorize the Treasurer to sell the revenue bonds at public or private sale and to do all things necessary or convenient to carry out the powers and purposes of these provisions. The bill would authorize revenue bonds to be issued on a tax-exempt or taxable basis in a principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000,000, excluding refunding bonds and excluding any net original issuance premium derived from the sale of the bonds. The bill would create the State TIF Revenue Bond Fund in the State Treasury and would require the net proceeds derived from the issuance of revenue bonds to be deposited in the fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the fund to the department and the Treasurer to finance or refinance projects designated by the department and to fund necessary reserves for principal and interest, capitalized interest, credit enhancement or liquidity costs, costs of issuance, and administrative expenses associated with the revenue bonds. This bill would provide that the revenue bonds may not be deemed to constitute a debt or liability of the state or any political subdivision of the state, or a pledge of the full faith and credit of the state or any political subdivision of the state, but shall be paid solely from the funds and revenues pledged for that purpose. This bill would provide that the state covenants with the holders of these revenue bonds, and with those parties who may enter into ancillary obligations, that it will not alter, amend, or restrict the specified provisions of law, including provisions creating the transportation improvement fee, in any manner that would materially adversely impair the interests of those bondholders or parties.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/04/20 - Enrolled Current pdf September 04, 2020
- Amended 08/25/20 - Amended Assembly pdf August 25, 2020
- Amended 08/24/20 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2020
- Amended 08/06/20 - Amended Assembly pdf August 06, 2020
- Amended 07/27/20 - Amended Assembly pdf July 27, 2020
- Amended 03/25/20 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2020
- Introduced 02/21/20 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2020
- SB1351 View text html
Action History
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 5462.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 20).
-
August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
August 18 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (August 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
July 28 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3685.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing June 9.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3622.) (May 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 29.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Beall · Primary
- Frazier · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Beall
Co-sponsors (1)
- Frazier
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 22% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 28 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 25% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 20% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1351 do?
- Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program to address deferred maintenance on the state highway system and the local street and road system. Existing law provides for the deposit of various revenues for the program in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account, including specified portions of revenues from certain fuel excise taxes, a road improvement fee imposed on certain zero-emission vehicles, and the transportation improvement fee. Existing law imposes the transportation improvement fee under the Vehicle License Fee Law with a varying fee between $25 and $175 based on vehicle value and an inflation adjustment, and requires the fee to be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the vehicle registration fee. Existing law requires revenues in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to be annually allocated by first making specified deductions for various specified purposes and then continuously appropriating the remaining revenues in the account 50% for allocation to the Department of Transportation for maintenance of the state highway system or for the State Highway Operation and Protection Program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. This bill would create the Transportation Improvement Fee Subaccount in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account and would transfer the revenues from the transportation improvement fee that are deposited in the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the subaccount. The bill would continuously appropriate the revenues in the subaccount to the department and cities and counties as part of the same appropriation made to those entities from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account. The bill would prohibit the revenues in the subaccount from being used to satisfy the above-described deductions from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account, except under specified circumstances. The bill would require the revenues in the subaccount to be used first to satisfy the 50% allocation to the department and would require those revenues to be deposited in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account, which the bill would create in the State Transportation Fund. This bill would continuously appropriate the amounts deposited in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account and pledged by the Transportation Improvement Fee Finance Committee, as specified below, to the Treasurer for the purposes of issuing revenue bonds, as specified, and the amounts that have not been pledged by the committee would be continuously appropriated to the department for the purposes of the maintenance of the state highway system or the State Highway Operation and Protection Program, subject to the terms of the issuing instrument for any outstanding revenue bonds. This bill would create the Transportation Improvement Fee Finance Committee, consisting of specified state officers, solely for the purpose of authorizing the issuance and sale of the above-described revenue bonds and the execution and delivery of ancillary obligations, and executing and entering into an issuing instrument. The bill would authorize the committee, in order to provide security for the revenue bonds and ancillary obligations, to include provisions in an issuing instrument pledging the interests of the state in the State Highway and SHOPP TIF Account to the payment of the revenue bonds and the payment of ancillary obligations. This bill would authorize the department to designate projects to be funded from the proceeds of revenue bonds that are included in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program adopted by the California Transportation Commission on May 13, 2020, and that have completed environmental clearance and project design. The bill would authorize the department to request the committee to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds to provide funds for the designated projects. This bill would permit the committee to authorize the Treasurer to sell the revenue bonds at public or private sale and to do all things necessary or convenient to carry out the powers and purposes of these provisions. The bill would authorize revenue bonds to be issued on a tax-exempt or taxable basis in a principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000,000, excluding refunding bonds and excluding any net original issuance premium derived from the sale of the bonds. The bill would create the State TIF Revenue Bond Fund in the State Treasury and would require the net proceeds derived from the issuance of revenue bonds to be deposited in the fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the fund to the department and the Treasurer to finance or refinance projects designated by the department and to fund necessary reserves for principal and interest, capitalized interest, credit enhancement or liquidity costs, costs of issuance, and administrative expenses associated with the revenue bonds. This bill would provide that the revenue bonds may not be deemed to constitute a debt or liability of the state or any political subdivision of the state, or a pledge of the full faith and credit of the state or any political subdivision of the state, but shall be paid solely from the funds and revenues pledged for that purpose. This bill would provide that the state covenants with the holders of these revenue bonds, and with those parties who may enter into ancillary obligations, that it will not alter, amend, or restrict the specified provisions of law, including provisions creating the transportation improvement fee, in any manner that would materially adversely impair the interests of those bondholders or parties.
- Who sponsors SB 1351?
- SB 1351 is sponsored by Beall and Frazier.
- What is the current status of SB 1351?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1351?
- Track SB 1351 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1351
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1351
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →