Postsecondary education.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3374 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3374.
You're tracking AB 3374
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3374 — Postsecondary education.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 129, Statutes of 2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 16, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Commencing with admissions for the 2020–21 academic year, existing law prohibits a campus of the California State University and, if adopted by the Regents of the University of California by appropriate resolution, the University of California, from admitting an applicant by admission by exception, as defined, unless the admission by exception has been approved, prior to the student's enrollment, by at least 3 senior campus administrators, the applicant is a California resident who is receiving an institution-based scholarship to attend the campus, or the applicant is accepted by an educational opportunity program for admission to the campus. Commencing with admissions for the 2020–21 academic year, existing law establishes requirements pertaining to admission by exception at a campus of the California State University and, if adopted by the regents by appropriate resolution, a campus of the University of California, as specified. This bill instead would make these provisions operative commencing with admissions for the 2021–22 academic year. (2) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law classifies any person who is employed to teach adult or community college classes for not more than 67% of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment for regular employees having comparable duties, excluding substitute service, as a temporary employee. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a community college district to employ a qualified individual as a temporary faculty member for a complete academic year, but not less than a complete semester or quarter during an academic year. Existing law requires that the employment of those persons be based upon the need for additional faculty during a particular semester or quarter, as specified. Existing law exempts persons serving as full-time or part-time clinical nursing faculty who meet specified requirements from certain limitations imposed under this provision. A single community college district may employ, for up to 4 semesters or 6 quarters, a person serving as full-time clinical nursing faculty or as part-time clinical nursing faculty teaching not more than 67% of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment for regular employees having comparable duties. This bill would specify that the full-time or part-time clinical nursing faculty referenced above may be employed by a single community college district for up to 4 semesters or 6 quarters within any period of 3 consecutive academic years. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to this and related provisions. (3) Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst's Office to aggregate, analyze, and submit an interim report by January 1, 2019, and a final report by December 1, 2021, to the Legislature on the progress of a financial and professional development grant funding program in achieving its prescribed purpose, based on information submitted by community colleges participating in the grant program. This bill would delete the requirement that the Legislative Analyst's office submit a final report on the progress of the grant program pursuant to these provisions. (4) The California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 provides for the regulation of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education in the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act also establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would make a clarifying change to a definition used under these provisions concerning the Student Tuition Recovery Fund.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/24/20 - Chaptered Current pdf September 24, 2020
- Enrolled 08/31/20 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2020
- Introduced 03/16/20 - Introduced pdf March 16, 2020
- AB3374 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 129, Statutes of 2020.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4378.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4732.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee April 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Higher Education · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Higher Education
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3374 do?
- (1) Commencing with admissions for the 2020–21 academic year, existing law prohibits a campus of the California State University and, if adopted by the Regents of the University of California by appropriate resolution, the University of California, from admitting an applicant by admission by exception, as defined, unless the admission by exception has been approved, prior to the student's enrollment, by at least 3 senior campus administrators, the applicant is a California resident who is receiving an institution-based scholarship to attend the campus, or the applicant is accepted by an educational opportunity program for admission to the campus. Commencing with admissions for the 2020–21 academic year, existing law establishes requirements pertaining to admission by exception at a campus of the California State University and, if adopted by the regents by appropriate resolution, a campus of the University of California, as specified. This bill instead would make these provisions operative commencing with admissions for the 2021–22 academic year. (2) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law classifies any person who is employed to teach adult or community college classes for not more than 67% of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment for regular employees having comparable duties, excluding substitute service, as a temporary employee. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a community college district to employ a qualified individual as a temporary faculty member for a complete academic year, but not less than a complete semester or quarter during an academic year. Existing law requires that the employment of those persons be based upon the need for additional faculty during a particular semester or quarter, as specified. Existing law exempts persons serving as full-time or part-time clinical nursing faculty who meet specified requirements from certain limitations imposed under this provision. A single community college district may employ, for up to 4 semesters or 6 quarters, a person serving as full-time clinical nursing faculty or as part-time clinical nursing faculty teaching not more than 67% of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment for regular employees having comparable duties. This bill would specify that the full-time or part-time clinical nursing faculty referenced above may be employed by a single community college district for up to 4 semesters or 6 quarters within any period of 3 consecutive academic years. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to this and related provisions. (3) Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst's Office to aggregate, analyze, and submit an interim report by January 1, 2019, and a final report by December 1, 2021, to the Legislature on the progress of a financial and professional development grant funding program in achieving its prescribed purpose, based on information submitted by community colleges participating in the grant program. This bill would delete the requirement that the Legislative Analyst's office submit a final report on the progress of the grant program pursuant to these provisions. (4) The California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 provides for the regulation of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education in the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act also establishes the Student Tuition Recovery Fund and requires the bureau to adopt regulations governing the administration and maintenance of the fund, including requirements relating to assessments on students and student claims against the fund, and establishes that the moneys in this fund are continuously appropriated to the bureau for specified purposes. This bill would make a clarifying change to a definition used under these provisions concerning the Student Tuition Recovery Fund.
- Who sponsors AB 3374?
- AB 3374 is sponsored by Committee on Higher Education.
- What is the current status of AB 3374?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 16, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 3374?
- Track AB 3374 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3374
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3374
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →