AB 1091 — Child support: suspension.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2020, suspends a money judgment or order for child support for any period exceeding 90 consecutive days in which the person ordered to pay support is incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized, except as specified. Under existing law, a child support obligation suspended under these provisions resumes on the first day of the first full month after the release of the person owing the child support. This bill would delete the repeal date, making these provisions effective indefinitely. The bill would modify when a judgment or order for child support is suspended to any period exceeding 90 consecutive days in which the person ordered to pay support is incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized, and would specify that the suspension applies starting on the first day of that incarceration or involuntary institutionalization. The bill would also modify the end date of the suspension to the 90th day after the release of the person owing support, the start of employment, or the first month the person is in receipt of earned or unearned income, whichever occurs first. The bill would, to the extent authorized by federal law, require the Department of Child Support Services or a local agency to promptly correct the calculation of child support owed, if the department or local agency erroneously collects or attempts to collect any amount of child support that is suspended by operation of these provisions. The bill would modify reporting requirements related to these provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/21/19 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 21, 2019
- Introduced 02/21/19 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2019
- AB1091 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 24).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jones-Sawyer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jones-Sawyer
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Carrillo, Juan | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1091 do?
- Existing law, until January 1, 2020, suspends a money judgment or order for child support for any period exceeding 90 consecutive days in which the person ordered to pay support is incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized, except as specified. Under existing law, a child support obligation suspended under these provisions resumes on the first day of the first full month after the release of the person owing the child support. This bill would delete the repeal date, making these provisions effective indefinitely. The bill would modify when a judgment or order for child support is suspended to any period exceeding 90 consecutive days in which the person ordered to pay support is incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized, and would specify that the suspension applies starting on the first day of that incarceration or involuntary institutionalization. The bill would also modify the end date of the suspension to the 90th day after the release of the person owing support, the start of employment, or the first month the person is in receipt of earned or unearned income, whichever occurs first. The bill would, to the extent authorized by federal law, require the Department of Child Support Services or a local agency to promptly correct the calculation of child support owed, if the department or local agency erroneously collects or attempts to collect any amount of child support that is suspended by operation of these provisions. The bill would modify reporting requirements related to these provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1091?
- AB 1091 is sponsored by Jones-Sawyer.
- What is the current status of AB 1091?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1091?
- Track AB 1091 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1091
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1091
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →