Local government: investments.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 998 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 998.
You're tracking SB 998
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 998 — Local government: investments.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 235, Statutes of 2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, generally authorizes 2 or more public agencies to agree to jointly exercise a common power. Existing law specifically authorizes 2 or more public agencies that have the authority to invest funds in their treasuries to agree to jointly exercise that common power and describes how funds subject to that agreement may be invested. This bill would authorize a joint powers authority formed as described above to establish the terms and conditions pursuant to which agencies may participate and invest in pool shares. The bill would specify that a federally recognized Indian tribe is eligible to participate in a joint powers authority formed for this purpose, consistent with its status as a public agency under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, or to otherwise invest in pool shares consistent with the terms and conditions established by the joint powers authority. Existing law regulates the investment of public funds by local agencies, as defined. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as specified, that has money in a sinking fund or in its treasury not required for immediate needs to invest the money as it deems wise or expedient in certain securities and financial instruments. In this regard, existing law authorizes investment in prime quality commercial paper issued by entities meeting certain criteria. Existing law prohibits local agencies, other than counties, from investing more than 25% of their moneys in eligible commercial paper and further prohibits these agencies from purchasing more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Existing law authorizes local agencies, as specified, to invest in medium-term notes, which are defined as corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of 5 years or less, issued by specified corporations or by depository institutions. This bill would prohibit a local agency, other than a county or a city and a county, from investing more than 10% of its total investment assets in the commercial paper and the medium-term notes of any single issuer. This bill, until January 1, 2026, for local agencies that have more than $100,000,000 of investment assets under management, would instead prohibit investing more than 40% of their moneys in eligible commercial paper. Existing law generally prohibits a local agency from investing any funds pursuant to specified authorizations in a security that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity. This bill, until January 1, 2026, would create an exception to this prohibition by authorizing a local agency to invest in securities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity, as specified.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/20 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2020
- Enrolled 09/04/20 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2020
- Amended 05/22/20 - Amended Senate pdf May 22, 2020
- Amended 05/06/20 - Amended Senate pdf May 06, 2020
- Introduced 02/13/20 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2020
- SB998 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 235, Statutes of 2020.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5280.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 11).
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3675.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3576.) (May 21).
-
Set for hearing May 21.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Moorlach · Primary
- Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Moorlach
Co-sponsors (1)
- Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Diep | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 998 do?
- Existing law, the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, generally authorizes 2 or more public agencies to agree to jointly exercise a common power. Existing law specifically authorizes 2 or more public agencies that have the authority to invest funds in their treasuries to agree to jointly exercise that common power and describes how funds subject to that agreement may be invested. This bill would authorize a joint powers authority formed as described above to establish the terms and conditions pursuant to which agencies may participate and invest in pool shares. The bill would specify that a federally recognized Indian tribe is eligible to participate in a joint powers authority formed for this purpose, consistent with its status as a public agency under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, or to otherwise invest in pool shares consistent with the terms and conditions established by the joint powers authority. Existing law regulates the investment of public funds by local agencies, as defined. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as specified, that has money in a sinking fund or in its treasury not required for immediate needs to invest the money as it deems wise or expedient in certain securities and financial instruments. In this regard, existing law authorizes investment in prime quality commercial paper issued by entities meeting certain criteria. Existing law prohibits local agencies, other than counties, from investing more than 25% of their moneys in eligible commercial paper and further prohibits these agencies from purchasing more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Existing law authorizes local agencies, as specified, to invest in medium-term notes, which are defined as corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of 5 years or less, issued by specified corporations or by depository institutions. This bill would prohibit a local agency, other than a county or a city and a county, from investing more than 10% of its total investment assets in the commercial paper and the medium-term notes of any single issuer. This bill, until January 1, 2026, for local agencies that have more than $100,000,000 of investment assets under management, would instead prohibit investing more than 40% of their moneys in eligible commercial paper. Existing law generally prohibits a local agency from investing any funds pursuant to specified authorizations in a security that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity. This bill, until January 1, 2026, would create an exception to this prohibition by authorizing a local agency to invest in securities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity, as specified.
- Who sponsors SB 998?
- SB 998 is sponsored by Moorlach and Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 998?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 998?
- Track SB 998 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 998
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 998
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →