California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 971 — Small water supplier and countywide water shortage contingency planning.

Last action — Referral to Com. on GOV. & F. rescinded due to the shortened 2020 Legislative Calendar.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires every public and private urban water supplier that directly or indirectly provides water for municipal purposes to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan. The act requires an urban water management plan to include a water shortage contingency plan, as provided. Existing law required the Department of Water Resources, in consultation with the State Water Resources Control Board and other relevant state and local agencies and stakeholders, to use available data to identify, no later than January 1, 2020, small water suppliers and rural communities that may be at risk of drought and water shortage vulnerability. Existing law required the department, in consultation with the state board, to propose to the Governor and the Legislature, by January 1, 2020, recommendations and guidance relating to the development and implementation of countywide drought and water shortage contingency plans to address the planning needs of small water suppliers and rural communities, as provided. This bill would require a small water supplier, as defined, with 1,000 to 2,999 service connections, inclusive, to prepare and adopt a small water supplier water shortage contingency plan that consists of specified elements. The bill would require a small water supplier with 15 to 999 service connections, inclusive, to take specified actions related to water shortage planning and response. The bill would require small water suppliers to provide to the public, and to report, the plan and specified water shortage planning information, as prescribed. This bill would require a county at risk of drought or water shortage, as determined by the department and the state board, to take specified actions related to water shortage planning and response, including, among other actions, including drought and water shortage planning information in the county's existing planning processes and establishing a county drought and water shortage task force. By imposing additional duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department, the state board, the Office of Emergency Services, or a relevant state agency to take specified actions to support a county's implementation of these provisions. This bill would impose requirements on the department and the state board to support implementation of the recommendations of the department's County Drought and Advisory Group, including requiring the department to maintain its drought and water shortage risk vulnerability tool for small water suppliers and rural communities, requiring the state board to identify state small water systems, small water suppliers and rural communities, and concentrations of domestic wells in California through a data system similar to the department's data system for public water systems, and requiring the department, in consultation with the state board and relevant state agencies, to establish a standing interagency drought and water shortage task force, as prescribed. The bill would require a county drought and water shortage task force and the interagency drought and water shortage task force to include, among other representatives, representatives from local governments. By imposing additional requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Referral to Com. on GOV. & F. rescinded due to the shortened 2020 Legislative Calendar.

  2. March 24 hearing postponed by committee.

  3. Set for hearing March 24.

  4. Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and GOV. & F.

  5. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  6. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hertzberg · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hertzberg

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 971 do?
Existing law, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires every public and private urban water supplier that directly or indirectly provides water for municipal purposes to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan. The act requires an urban water management plan to include a water shortage contingency plan, as provided. Existing law required the Department of Water Resources, in consultation with the State Water Resources Control Board and other relevant state and local agencies and stakeholders, to use available data to identify, no later than January 1, 2020, small water suppliers and rural communities that may be at risk of drought and water shortage vulnerability. Existing law required the department, in consultation with the state board, to propose to the Governor and the Legislature, by January 1, 2020, recommendations and guidance relating to the development and implementation of countywide drought and water shortage contingency plans to address the planning needs of small water suppliers and rural communities, as provided. This bill would require a small water supplier, as defined, with 1,000 to 2,999 service connections, inclusive, to prepare and adopt a small water supplier water shortage contingency plan that consists of specified elements. The bill would require a small water supplier with 15 to 999 service connections, inclusive, to take specified actions related to water shortage planning and response. The bill would require small water suppliers to provide to the public, and to report, the plan and specified water shortage planning information, as prescribed. This bill would require a county at risk of drought or water shortage, as determined by the department and the state board, to take specified actions related to water shortage planning and response, including, among other actions, including drought and water shortage planning information in the county's existing planning processes and establishing a county drought and water shortage task force. By imposing additional duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department, the state board, the Office of Emergency Services, or a relevant state agency to take specified actions to support a county's implementation of these provisions. This bill would impose requirements on the department and the state board to support implementation of the recommendations of the department's County Drought and Advisory Group, including requiring the department to maintain its drought and water shortage risk vulnerability tool for small water suppliers and rural communities, requiring the state board to identify state small water systems, small water suppliers and rural communities, and concentrations of domestic wells in California through a data system similar to the department's data system for public water systems, and requiring the department, in consultation with the state board and relevant state agencies, to establish a standing interagency drought and water shortage task force, as prescribed. The bill would require a county drought and water shortage task force and the interagency drought and water shortage task force to include, among other representatives, representatives from local governments. By imposing additional requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 971?
SB 971 is sponsored by Hertzberg.
What is the current status of SB 971?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 971?
Track SB 971 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 971

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 971

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →