California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 538 — Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations and reporting.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 714, Statutes of 2019.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires the Office of Emergency Services to establish a protocol for the examination and treatment of victims of sexual assault and attempted sexual assault and the collection and preservation of evidence therefrom. Existing law requires the office to adopt a standard and a complete form or forms for the recording of medical and physical evidence data disclosed by a victim of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault. This bill would authorize the form to be issued as a paper version or as an electronic version, or as both the paper and electronic version. Existing law requires a qualified health care professional who conducts an examination for evidence of a sexual assault or an attempted sexual assault to use the standard form and to make those observations and perform those tests required to record the data required by the form. Existing law defines qualified health care professional for this purpose to include a physician and surgeon and a currently licensed nurse who is working in consultation with a physician and surgeon who conducts examinations or provides treatment in a general acute care hospital or in a physician and surgeon's office. This bill would include in the definition of "qualified health care professional" a currently licensed nurse practitioner or a physician assistant who is working in consultation with a physician and surgeon and who conducts examinations or provides treatment in a general acute care hospital or in a physician and surgeon's office. Existing law requires a hospital-based training center to be established through a competitive bidding process, to train medical personnel on how to perform medical evidentiary examinations for victims of specified crimes, including, among other things, child abuse or neglect, domestic violence, and sexual assault. This bill would require that center to be identified as the California Clinical Forensic Medical Training Center and would require the center to train qualified health care professionals, as defined above. The bill would require the training to additionally include specified training regarding victims of child sexual abuse, intimate partner violence, and sex trafficking. The bill would require the center to, among other things, develop and maintain updated standardized medical evidentiary examination forms and protocols for examinations of specified crimes, and to provide training and technical assistance for sexual assault forensic examination teams on the science of medical evidentiary examinations, emerging trends, and sound operational practices. Existing law requires any victim of a sexual assault who seeks a medical evidentiary examination to be provided with one, as specified. This bill would authorize data from a medical evidentiary examination, with the patient's identity removed, to be collected for health and forensic purposes in accordance with state and federal privacy laws. Existing law prohibits costs incurred by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for the medical evidentiary examination portion of the examination of the victim of a sexual assault, as described in a specified protocol, when the examination is performed as specified, from being charged directly or indirectly to the victim of the assault. This bill would make that prohibition on charging a victim of sexual assault applicable to costs incurred by a clinic or sexual assault forensic examination team, and would include nurse practitioners and physician's assistants as qualified health care professionals. Existing law requires the cost of a medical evidentiary examination performed by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for a victim of a sexual assault to be treated as a local cost and charged to the local law enforcement agency in whose jurisdiction the alleged offense was committed. Existing law authorizes a local law enforcement agency to seek reimbursement from the Office of Emergency Services for the cost of conducting the medical evidentiary examination portion of a medical examination of a sexual assault victim who does not participate in the criminal justice system and limits the amount that may be charged and reimbursed for that portion of the exam to $300. This bill, instead, would authorize a local law enforcement agency to seek reimbursement for the cost of conducting the medical evidentiary examination of a sexual assault victim who is undecided at the time of an examination whether to report to law enforcement. The bill would repeal the provision limiting the amount that may be charged and reimbursed to $300, and would instead require the Office of Emergency Services to determine the amount that may be reimbursed to offset the cost of a medical evidentiary exam once every 5 years, not to exceed 50% of the most recently determined reimbursement amount. The bill would authorize the Office of Emergency Services to redetermine the amount that may be reimbursed to offset the cost of a medical evidentiary exam, at any time, if the federal government reduces the amount of specified federal grants awarded to the office. Existing law authorizes a minor to consent to hospital, medical, and surgical care related to a sexual assault without the consent of a parent or guardian. This bill would also authorize a minor to consent to, or withhold consent for, a medical evidentiary examination without the consent of a parent or guardian. Existing law requires the collection of physical evidence to conform to specified procedures, including, but not limited to, requiring that a baseline gonorrhea culture and syphilis serology be taken, if indicated by the history of contact, that specimens for a pregnancy test be taken, if indicated by the history of contact, and the taking of both swabs and slides, as specified. This bill, instead, would authorize sexually transmitted infection testing and presumptive treatment to be provided, if indicated by the history of the contact. The bill would require that specimens for a pregnancy test be taken if indicated by the history of contact and age of the victim. The bill would require baseline testing for sexually transmitted infections to be done for a child, a person with a disability, or a person who is residing in a long-term care facility, if forensically indicated. The bill would also require, for victims of sexual assault with an assault history of strangulation, best practices to be followed for a complete physical examination and diagnostic testing to prevent adverse outcomes or morbidity and documentation on a supplemental medical evidentiary examination form. The bill would also delete the requirement to take slides as part of the procedure to collect physical evidence and would make a conforming change. The bill would further require, on or before January 1, 2021, a hospital, clinic, or other emergency medical facility at which medical evidentiary examinations are conducted to implement a system to maintain medical evidentiary examination reports in a manner that facilitates their release only as required or authorized by law.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 714, Statutes of 2019.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3506.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2815.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  11. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  12. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11).

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  16. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1259.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 10).

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Low

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 52000
Democratic 21001
Republican 4001
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chu — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Salas — Yea
Brough — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Weber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Levine — Yea
Wood — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27000
Democratic 10000
Republican 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Chang — Yea
Pan — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47001
Republican 6001
Democratic 24001
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chu — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Salas — Yea
Brough — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Weber — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Levine — Yea
Wood — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7000
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 17001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 538 do?
Existing law requires the Office of Emergency Services to establish a protocol for the examination and treatment of victims of sexual assault and attempted sexual assault and the collection and preservation of evidence therefrom. Existing law requires the office to adopt a standard and a complete form or forms for the recording of medical and physical evidence data disclosed by a victim of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault. This bill would authorize the form to be issued as a paper version or as an electronic version, or as both the paper and electronic version. Existing law requires a qualified health care professional who conducts an examination for evidence of a sexual assault or an attempted sexual assault to use the standard form and to make those observations and perform those tests required to record the data required by the form. Existing law defines qualified health care professional for this purpose to include a physician and surgeon and a currently licensed nurse who is working in consultation with a physician and surgeon who conducts examinations or provides treatment in a general acute care hospital or in a physician and surgeon's office. This bill would include in the definition of "qualified health care professional" a currently licensed nurse practitioner or a physician assistant who is working in consultation with a physician and surgeon and who conducts examinations or provides treatment in a general acute care hospital or in a physician and surgeon's office. Existing law requires a hospital-based training center to be established through a competitive bidding process, to train medical personnel on how to perform medical evidentiary examinations for victims of specified crimes, including, among other things, child abuse or neglect, domestic violence, and sexual assault. This bill would require that center to be identified as the California Clinical Forensic Medical Training Center and would require the center to train qualified health care professionals, as defined above. The bill would require the training to additionally include specified training regarding victims of child sexual abuse, intimate partner violence, and sex trafficking. The bill would require the center to, among other things, develop and maintain updated standardized medical evidentiary examination forms and protocols for examinations of specified crimes, and to provide training and technical assistance for sexual assault forensic examination teams on the science of medical evidentiary examinations, emerging trends, and sound operational practices. Existing law requires any victim of a sexual assault who seeks a medical evidentiary examination to be provided with one, as specified. This bill would authorize data from a medical evidentiary examination, with the patient's identity removed, to be collected for health and forensic purposes in accordance with state and federal privacy laws. Existing law prohibits costs incurred by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for the medical evidentiary examination portion of the examination of the victim of a sexual assault, as described in a specified protocol, when the examination is performed as specified, from being charged directly or indirectly to the victim of the assault. This bill would make that prohibition on charging a victim of sexual assault applicable to costs incurred by a clinic or sexual assault forensic examination team, and would include nurse practitioners and physician's assistants as qualified health care professionals. Existing law requires the cost of a medical evidentiary examination performed by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for a victim of a sexual assault to be treated as a local cost and charged to the local law enforcement agency in whose jurisdiction the alleged offense was committed. Existing law authorizes a local law enforcement agency to seek reimbursement from the Office of Emergency Services for the cost of conducting the medical evidentiary examination portion of a medical examination of a sexual assault victim who does not participate in the criminal justice system and limits the amount that may be charged and reimbursed for that portion of the exam to $300. This bill, instead, would authorize a local law enforcement agency to seek reimbursement for the cost of conducting the medical evidentiary examination of a sexual assault victim who is undecided at the time of an examination whether to report to law enforcement. The bill would repeal the provision limiting the amount that may be charged and reimbursed to $300, and would instead require the Office of Emergency Services to determine the amount that may be reimbursed to offset the cost of a medical evidentiary exam once every 5 years, not to exceed 50% of the most recently determined reimbursement amount. The bill would authorize the Office of Emergency Services to redetermine the amount that may be reimbursed to offset the cost of a medical evidentiary exam, at any time, if the federal government reduces the amount of specified federal grants awarded to the office. Existing law authorizes a minor to consent to hospital, medical, and surgical care related to a sexual assault without the consent of a parent or guardian. This bill would also authorize a minor to consent to, or withhold consent for, a medical evidentiary examination without the consent of a parent or guardian. Existing law requires the collection of physical evidence to conform to specified procedures, including, but not limited to, requiring that a baseline gonorrhea culture and syphilis serology be taken, if indicated by the history of contact, that specimens for a pregnancy test be taken, if indicated by the history of contact, and the taking of both swabs and slides, as specified. This bill, instead, would authorize sexually transmitted infection testing and presumptive treatment to be provided, if indicated by the history of the contact. The bill would require that specimens for a pregnancy test be taken if indicated by the history of contact and age of the victim. The bill would require baseline testing for sexually transmitted infections to be done for a child, a person with a disability, or a person who is residing in a long-term care facility, if forensically indicated. The bill would also require, for victims of sexual assault with an assault history of strangulation, best practices to be followed for a complete physical examination and diagnostic testing to prevent adverse outcomes or morbidity and documentation on a supplemental medical evidentiary examination form. The bill would also delete the requirement to take slides as part of the procedure to collect physical evidence and would make a conforming change. The bill would further require, on or before January 1, 2021, a hospital, clinic, or other emergency medical facility at which medical evidentiary examinations are conducted to implement a system to maintain medical evidentiary examination reports in a manner that facilitates their release only as required or authorized by law.
Who sponsors AB 538?
AB 538 is sponsored by Berman, Marc (Democratic) and Low.
What is the current status of AB 538?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 538?
Track AB 538 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 538

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 538

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →