California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1270 — False Claims Act.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the False Claims Act, provides that any person who commits specified acts, including, but not limited to, knowingly presenting a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval or knowingly making or using a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, is liable to the state or to the political subdivision for 3 times the amount of damages that the state or political subdivision sustained because of the act and for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any penalties or damages, and is subject to a civil penalty. That act requires the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority of a political subdivision to diligently investigate violations of those specific acts involving state funds or political subdivision funds, respectively, and authorizes the Attorney General, the prosecuting attorney, or a qui tam plaintiff to bring a civil action against a person who commits those acts. This bill, with respect to whether a false record or statement is material, would require that the materiality test focus on the potential effect of the false record or statement when it is made, not on the actual effect of the false statement when it is discovered. This bill would specify that the amount of damages include consequential damages. This bill would state that these changes are declaratory of existing law. The False Claims Act does not apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code. This bill would apply the False Claims Act to apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code if specified conditions are met, including if damages pleaded in an action under the act exceed $200,000 and that the claim, record, or statement was made on or after January 1, 2020. This bill would require the Attorney General or prosecuting authority, as described, to consult with the taxing authorities to whom the claim was submitted prior to filing or intervening in any action under the act that is based on the filing of false claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority, but not the qui tam plaintiff, to obtain otherwise confidential records relating to taxes, fees, or other obligations under the Revenue and Taxation Code. The bill would prohibit the disclosure of federal tax information to the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority without authorization from the Internal Revenue Service. The bill would require that any such information obtained be kept confidential, except as necessary to investigate and prosecute violations of these provisions. Under the False Claims Act, an employee, contractor, or agent who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of their employment for engaging in lawful acts, as specified, or other efforts to stop violations of the act, is entitled to all relief necessary to make them whole. This bill would specify that the relief described above applies to any current or former employee, contractor, or agent. The bill would extend this relief if these parties are otherwise harmed or penalized by an employer. This bill would define lawful acts to include specified acts that may violate a contract, employment term, or duty owed to an employer or contractor. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 10).

  5. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  7. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and GOV. & F.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 19. Page 1883.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (May 16).

  12. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Read second time and amended.

  15. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 9).

  16. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  17. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on suspense file

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 3002
Democratic 1000
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5000
Unaffiliated 2100
Republican 0100
Total 7200
% of votes cast 78%22%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Borgeas — Nay
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 19 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 331005
Democratic 23200
Republican 0700
Total 561905
% of votes cast 70%24%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Smith — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Brough — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mayes — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Diep — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Cooley — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6100
Unaffiliated 7400
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Brough — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Diep — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6200
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 9300
% of votes cast 75%25%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Chiu — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Holden — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1270 do?
Existing law, the False Claims Act, provides that any person who commits specified acts, including, but not limited to, knowingly presenting a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval or knowingly making or using a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, is liable to the state or to the political subdivision for 3 times the amount of damages that the state or political subdivision sustained because of the act and for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any penalties or damages, and is subject to a civil penalty. That act requires the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority of a political subdivision to diligently investigate violations of those specific acts involving state funds or political subdivision funds, respectively, and authorizes the Attorney General, the prosecuting attorney, or a qui tam plaintiff to bring a civil action against a person who commits those acts. This bill, with respect to whether a false record or statement is material, would require that the materiality test focus on the potential effect of the false record or statement when it is made, not on the actual effect of the false statement when it is discovered. This bill would specify that the amount of damages include consequential damages. This bill would state that these changes are declaratory of existing law. The False Claims Act does not apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code. This bill would apply the False Claims Act to apply to claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code if specified conditions are met, including if damages pleaded in an action under the act exceed $200,000 and that the claim, record, or statement was made on or after January 1, 2020. This bill would require the Attorney General or prosecuting authority, as described, to consult with the taxing authorities to whom the claim was submitted prior to filing or intervening in any action under the act that is based on the filing of false claims, records, or statements made under the Revenue and Taxation Code. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority, but not the qui tam plaintiff, to obtain otherwise confidential records relating to taxes, fees, or other obligations under the Revenue and Taxation Code. The bill would prohibit the disclosure of federal tax information to the Attorney General or the prosecuting authority without authorization from the Internal Revenue Service. The bill would require that any such information obtained be kept confidential, except as necessary to investigate and prosecute violations of these provisions. Under the False Claims Act, an employee, contractor, or agent who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of their employment for engaging in lawful acts, as specified, or other efforts to stop violations of the act, is entitled to all relief necessary to make them whole. This bill would specify that the relief described above applies to any current or former employee, contractor, or agent. The bill would extend this relief if these parties are otherwise harmed or penalized by an employer. This bill would define lawful acts to include specified acts that may violate a contract, employment term, or duty owed to an employer or contractor. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Who sponsors AB 1270?
AB 1270 is sponsored by Mark Stone.
What is the current status of AB 1270?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1270?
Track AB 1270 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1270

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1270

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →