California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 435 — Family law: evidence.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes a hearsay rule that evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated is inadmissible, except as specified. This bill would allow a party in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation to rely on hearsay evidence in establishing the character and value of separate and community property in certain circumstances, including when a hearsay statement is relied upon by an expert in forming the expert's opinion if the hearsay statement is of the type routinely relied upon by the expert and the statement has been evaluated by the expert and determined to be trustworthy. Existing law authorizes the court, in a contested proceeding involving child custody or visitation rights, to appoint a child custody evaluator to conduct a child custody evaluation in cases in which the court determines it is in the best interests of the child. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adopt standards for full and partial court-connected evaluations, investigations, and assessments related to child custody. This bill would require the Judicial Council, by January 1, 2021, to include within those standards, standards for recommendations made by private child custody recommending counseling (CCRC) professionals appointed by the court to make recommendations relating to child custody and visitation rights. Under the bill, a report based on a court-ordered evaluation, private CCRC recommendation, investigation, or assessment prepared in compliance with those standards and any hearsay evidence contained in the report, would be admissible in court and constitute competent evidence if the report is provided to the court and to all parties or their counsel at least 10 days prior to the custody hearing. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2021, to promulgate a statewide rule of court requiring a person conducting an evaluation, investigation, or assessment in a child custody case to make and maintain a detailed record of all interviews conducted during the evaluation, investigation, or assessment process and to maintain the interview records until the case is resolved by final order. Existing law requires the child custody evaluator to file a written confidential report of their evaluation with the court and allows the report to be received in evidence on stipulation of the parties. This bill would allow the report to be received in evidence without regard to the stipulation of the parties. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to establish judicial training programs for individuals who perform duties in domestic violence matters. This bill would require the Judicial Council to promulgate a rule of court requiring training for individuals who conduct court evaluations, investigations, and assessments in child custody cases, as specified.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. April 23 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 6. Page 798.) Reconsideration granted.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  4. Set for hearing April 23.

  5. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  6. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  7. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Moorlach · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Moorlach

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 2 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 1201
Democratic 0400
Total 2601
% of votes cast 22%67%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Monning — Nay
Wieckowski — Nay
Allen — Not Voting
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Nay
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Democratic 4000
Unaffiliated 4000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Allen — Yea
Monning — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 435 do?
Existing law establishes a hearsay rule that evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated is inadmissible, except as specified. This bill would allow a party in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation to rely on hearsay evidence in establishing the character and value of separate and community property in certain circumstances, including when a hearsay statement is relied upon by an expert in forming the expert's opinion if the hearsay statement is of the type routinely relied upon by the expert and the statement has been evaluated by the expert and determined to be trustworthy. Existing law authorizes the court, in a contested proceeding involving child custody or visitation rights, to appoint a child custody evaluator to conduct a child custody evaluation in cases in which the court determines it is in the best interests of the child. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adopt standards for full and partial court-connected evaluations, investigations, and assessments related to child custody. This bill would require the Judicial Council, by January 1, 2021, to include within those standards, standards for recommendations made by private child custody recommending counseling (CCRC) professionals appointed by the court to make recommendations relating to child custody and visitation rights. Under the bill, a report based on a court-ordered evaluation, private CCRC recommendation, investigation, or assessment prepared in compliance with those standards and any hearsay evidence contained in the report, would be admissible in court and constitute competent evidence if the report is provided to the court and to all parties or their counsel at least 10 days prior to the custody hearing. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2021, to promulgate a statewide rule of court requiring a person conducting an evaluation, investigation, or assessment in a child custody case to make and maintain a detailed record of all interviews conducted during the evaluation, investigation, or assessment process and to maintain the interview records until the case is resolved by final order. Existing law requires the child custody evaluator to file a written confidential report of their evaluation with the court and allows the report to be received in evidence on stipulation of the parties. This bill would allow the report to be received in evidence without regard to the stipulation of the parties. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to establish judicial training programs for individuals who perform duties in domestic violence matters. This bill would require the Judicial Council to promulgate a rule of court requiring training for individuals who conduct court evaluations, investigations, and assessments in child custody cases, as specified.
Who sponsors SB 435?
SB 435 is sponsored by Moorlach.
What is the current status of SB 435?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 435?
Track SB 435 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 435

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 435

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →