California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 2902 — Fine art: physical alteration or destruction.

Last action — Referred to Com. on JUD.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the California Art Preservation Act (CAPA) , prohibits certain acts relating to the physical alteration or destruction of fine art, defined as an original painting, sculpture, or drawing, or an original work of art in glass, of recognized quality, other than a work prepared under contract for commercial use by its purchaser, including the intentional defacing, mutilating, altering, or destruction of a work of fine art except by an artist who owns and possesses a work of fine art that the artist has created. Existing law requires a trier of fact regarding the question of whether a work of art is of recognized quality to rely on the opinions of artists, art dealers, collectors of fine art, curators of art museums, and other persons involved with the creation or marketing of fine art. This bill would require a trier of fact to additionally rely on the visibility of the work, community recognition awards attributable to the work, and recognition and awards received by the artist of the work. CAPA provides that if a work of fine art cannot be removed from a building without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, the rights and duties described above, unless expressly reserved by an instrument in writing signed by the owner of the building, containing a legal description of the property and properly recorded, shall be deemed waived. The law also provides that if a work of fine art can be removed from a building without substantial harm to the fine art, and in the course of or after removal, the owner intends to cause or allow the fine art to suffer physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction, the rights and duties described above apply unless the owner of the building has provided, or diligently attempted to provide, written notice to the artist or the artist's heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, and the notified parties have failed to remove the work or pay for its removal within 90 days. CAPA contains a similar provision in the case of a work of fine art that can be removed from a building scheduled for demolition without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, and the owner of the building has notified the owner of the work of fine art of the scheduled demolition or the owner of the building is the owner of the work of fine art, and the owner of the work of fine art elects not to remove the work of fine art. This bill would additionally include an interested community and a city art commission in the list of required recipients of the written notice described above and would authorize a court to extend the 90-day period within which a noticed party is required to act to remove the art from the building. CAPA authorizes an organization, defined as a public or private not-for-profit entity or association, in existence at least three years at the time an action is filed under that law, a major purpose of which is to stage, display, or otherwise present works of art to the public or to promote the interests of the arts or artists, to commence an action for injunctive relief to preserve or restore the integrity of a work of fine art from those acts, subject to certain conditions related to whether a work can be safely removed from a building, which are similar those described above. This bill would expand the definition of organization to include an entity in existence for at least one year, a major purpose of which is to preserve the cultural or historical integrity of the community.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  2. Read first time.

  3. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  4. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2902 do?
Existing law, the California Art Preservation Act (CAPA) , prohibits certain acts relating to the physical alteration or destruction of fine art, defined as an original painting, sculpture, or drawing, or an original work of art in glass, of recognized quality, other than a work prepared under contract for commercial use by its purchaser, including the intentional defacing, mutilating, altering, or destruction of a work of fine art except by an artist who owns and possesses a work of fine art that the artist has created. Existing law requires a trier of fact regarding the question of whether a work of art is of recognized quality to rely on the opinions of artists, art dealers, collectors of fine art, curators of art museums, and other persons involved with the creation or marketing of fine art. This bill would require a trier of fact to additionally rely on the visibility of the work, community recognition awards attributable to the work, and recognition and awards received by the artist of the work. CAPA provides that if a work of fine art cannot be removed from a building without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, the rights and duties described above, unless expressly reserved by an instrument in writing signed by the owner of the building, containing a legal description of the property and properly recorded, shall be deemed waived. The law also provides that if a work of fine art can be removed from a building without substantial harm to the fine art, and in the course of or after removal, the owner intends to cause or allow the fine art to suffer physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction, the rights and duties described above apply unless the owner of the building has provided, or diligently attempted to provide, written notice to the artist or the artist's heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, and the notified parties have failed to remove the work or pay for its removal within 90 days. CAPA contains a similar provision in the case of a work of fine art that can be removed from a building scheduled for demolition without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, and the owner of the building has notified the owner of the work of fine art of the scheduled demolition or the owner of the building is the owner of the work of fine art, and the owner of the work of fine art elects not to remove the work of fine art. This bill would additionally include an interested community and a city art commission in the list of required recipients of the written notice described above and would authorize a court to extend the 90-day period within which a noticed party is required to act to remove the art from the building. CAPA authorizes an organization, defined as a public or private not-for-profit entity or association, in existence at least three years at the time an action is filed under that law, a major purpose of which is to stage, display, or otherwise present works of art to the public or to promote the interests of the arts or artists, to commence an action for injunctive relief to preserve or restore the integrity of a work of fine art from those acts, subject to certain conditions related to whether a work can be safely removed from a building, which are similar those described above. This bill would expand the definition of organization to include an entity in existence for at least one year, a major purpose of which is to preserve the cultural or historical integrity of the community.
Who sponsors AB 2902?
AB 2902 is sponsored by Kalra, Ash (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2902?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2902?
Track AB 2902 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2902

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2902

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →