California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 609 — Professions and vocations.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 377, Statutes of 2019.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Private Investigator Act provides for the licensure and regulation of private investigators and requires the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services to consider, and authorizes the bureau to require, an applicant for licensure as a private investigator to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics. That act authorizes the bureau to specify which courses and course providers satisfy the requirement if the bureau requires an applicant to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics. This bill would require the bureau, if it requires an applicant to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics, to both specify which courses and course providers satisfy the requirement and to make that information available on its internet website. (2) Existing law, the Private Security Services Act, a violation of which is a crime, provides for the regulation of private patrol operators by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a licensee to maintain an accurate and current record verifying that each of their employees has completed specified training related to security officer skills. Existing law requires that a licensee maintain the records for at least 2 years and make the records available to the bureau upon request. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, require that a security guard registrant maintain records verifying completion of certain required trainings, and to similarly maintain the certificate of completion of those trainings for at least 2 years from the date the trainings were completed and provide the bureau those records upon request. (3) Existing law requires a course provider to issue a certificate to a security guard upon satisfactory completion of a required course and permits a private patrol operator to provide additional training programs and courses. Existing law requires that the department develop and approve by regulation a standard course and curriculum for specified security officer skills training. Existing law authorizes those trainings to be administered, tested, and certified by any licensee or any organization or school approved by the department. This bill would instead require that a course provider issue a certificate of completion to a registrant after the registrant completes each training course, and would require each training course to meet certain requirements. This bill would require the bureau to develop and approve by regulation a standard course and curriculum for specified security officer skills training. This bill would authorize certain trainings to be administered, tested, and certified by a certified training facility or an organization or school approved by the bureau. This bill would require that the bureau approve any instructor of an organization or school who is used to administer those trainings. (4) Existing law prohibits an employee of a licensee who performs the function of a security guard or security patrolperson from being issued a registration card without first meeting specified requirements. Existing law requires that an employee who performs the function of a security guard or security patrolperson but is not registered with the bureau, upon accepting employment by a private patrol operator, complete and submit an application for registration, as specified. This bill would instead prohibit a licensee from permitting an employee to perform the functions of a security guard without certifying that the person holds a current and valid security guard registration. This bill would make conforming changes to that effect. (5) Existing law requires the licensee to maintain supplies of applications and fingerprint cards that must be provided by the bureau upon request. Existing law requires an employee, on the first day of employment and at the request of the client thereafter, to display to the client their registration card, as specified. This bill would delete those provisions. (6) Existing law requires that an application be verified and include specified information regarding, among other things, the employer's address and license number. This bill would modify the information required on that application by no longer requiring the employer's address and license number, and by requiring the application to include, among other things, the provider of the course in the exercise of the power to arrest. (7) Existing law requires a registration card to expire by a specified date, and establishes a process for a registrant to renew their registration. Existing law authorizes a registrant whose registration has been renewed but who has not yet received a renewed registration card by the time that their prior registration has expired to, for 90 days after the expiration of the card, continue to meet registration requirements by providing evidence of renewal. This bill would instead authorize a registrant to work as a security guard pending receipt of the renewed registration card if the renewed registration card has not been delivered to the registrant before the expiration of the prior registration, but the bureau has renewed the registration. (8) Existing law requires a firearm training facility, before allowing a person to participate in the course of training in the carrying and usage of firearms, to verify and certify that they have seen documentation verifying that the person is a United States citizen or possesses permanent legal alien status in the United States. This bill would require a firearms training facility to also verify and certify that they have seen the documentation specified above before allowing a person to participate in the requalification course in carrying and using a firearm. (9) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of locksmiths by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and requires an application for a locksmith license to be made in writing and filed with the Chief of the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. This bill would delete the requirement that the application be made in writing. (10) The Alarm Company Act requires the Director of Consumer Affairs to issue a firearms permit to an applicant who is a licensee under the act, a qualified manager of a licensee, a designated branch officer of a licensee, or a registered alarm agent who meets specified requirements. The Private Security Services Act requires the bureau to issue a firearms permit to a licensee, a qualified manager of a licensee, or a registered security guard who meets specified requirements. The Private Investigator Act requires the bureau to issue a firearms permit to an applicant who is a licensee or a qualified manager of a licensee who meets specified requirements. Existing law prohibits the director from renewing a firearms qualification card unless specified requirements are met, including that the applicant has successfully passed a written examination. This bill would require an applicant for a firearms permit under the above-specified provisions to be at least 21 years of age. The bill would, on an ongoing basis, require an applicant for a firearms qualification card to produce evidence to the firearm training facility that the applicant is a citizen of the United States or has permanent legal alien status in the United States. (11) Existing law provides that the powers and duties of the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services under the Alarm Company Act, the Collateral Recovery Act, the Private Security Services Act, the Proprietary Security Services Act, the Private Investigator Act, and under the provisions regulating locksmiths are subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and requires the review to be performed as if the act were scheduled to be repealed as of January 1, 2020. This bill would revise that date to January 1, 2024. (12) Existing law establishes the Private Investigator Fund and directs money derived from the Private Investigator Act to be deposited into that fund and expended for purposes of the act upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would abolish that fund and direct money derived under the act to be deposited into the Private Security Services Fund. The bill would increase the amounts of various fees under the act, including the application and examination fee, the branch office certificate fee, the fee for an original private investigator license, the fee to obtain a certificate of licensure, and the reexamination fee for applicants and qualified managers. The bill would increase the processing fee for the assignment of a license. The bill would establish a fee of $25 for an endorsed verification for licensure, certification, or permit and would limit the reinstatement fee following a suspension to not more than 50% of the renewal fee. The bill would make the provisions revising fees operative on July 1, 2020. (13) This bill would make other conforming and nonsubstantive changes, including deleting obsolete provisions. (14) Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime under the Private Security Services Act, and by expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 377, Statutes of 2019.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2929.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 2908.)

  6. Set for hearing September 12.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2808.) Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 68. Noes 2. Page 3324.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 2.) (August 30).

  13. August 21 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  14. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 1.) (July 9).

  16. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1279.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  19. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1105.) (May 16).

  22. Set for hearing May 16.

  23. May 13 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  24. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 769.) (April 22).

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  27. Set for hearing April 22.

  28. Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 27.

  31. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Glazer · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Glazer

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27000
Democratic 10000
Republican 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Chang — Yea
Pan — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 68 Yea · 2 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 46105
Democratic 20101
Republican 2003
Total 68209
% of votes cast 86%3%0%11%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Salas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Wood — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chu — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Weber — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Diep — Nay
Fong — Not Voting
Brough — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Obernolte — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Nay
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 15 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 4100
Unaffiliated 11101
Total 15201
% of votes cast 83%11%0%6%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Fong — Yea
Brough — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Diep — Nay
Obernolte — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Nay
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12101
Democratic 4000
Republican 1000
Total 17101
% of votes cast 89%5%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Gloria — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Ting — Yea
Holden — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Fong — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent SB609

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27000
Democratic 9000
Republican 2000
Total 38000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beall — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Roth — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Chang — Yea
Pan — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 6000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (6)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 6000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (6)
Member Party Vote
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 609 do?
(1) The Private Investigator Act provides for the licensure and regulation of private investigators and requires the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services to consider, and authorizes the bureau to require, an applicant for licensure as a private investigator to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics. That act authorizes the bureau to specify which courses and course providers satisfy the requirement if the bureau requires an applicant to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics. This bill would require the bureau, if it requires an applicant to submit proof of satisfactory completion of a course in professional ethics, to both specify which courses and course providers satisfy the requirement and to make that information available on its internet website. (2) Existing law, the Private Security Services Act, a violation of which is a crime, provides for the regulation of private patrol operators by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a licensee to maintain an accurate and current record verifying that each of their employees has completed specified training related to security officer skills. Existing law requires that a licensee maintain the records for at least 2 years and make the records available to the bureau upon request. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, require that a security guard registrant maintain records verifying completion of certain required trainings, and to similarly maintain the certificate of completion of those trainings for at least 2 years from the date the trainings were completed and provide the bureau those records upon request. (3) Existing law requires a course provider to issue a certificate to a security guard upon satisfactory completion of a required course and permits a private patrol operator to provide additional training programs and courses. Existing law requires that the department develop and approve by regulation a standard course and curriculum for specified security officer skills training. Existing law authorizes those trainings to be administered, tested, and certified by any licensee or any organization or school approved by the department. This bill would instead require that a course provider issue a certificate of completion to a registrant after the registrant completes each training course, and would require each training course to meet certain requirements. This bill would require the bureau to develop and approve by regulation a standard course and curriculum for specified security officer skills training. This bill would authorize certain trainings to be administered, tested, and certified by a certified training facility or an organization or school approved by the bureau. This bill would require that the bureau approve any instructor of an organization or school who is used to administer those trainings. (4) Existing law prohibits an employee of a licensee who performs the function of a security guard or security patrolperson from being issued a registration card without first meeting specified requirements. Existing law requires that an employee who performs the function of a security guard or security patrolperson but is not registered with the bureau, upon accepting employment by a private patrol operator, complete and submit an application for registration, as specified. This bill would instead prohibit a licensee from permitting an employee to perform the functions of a security guard without certifying that the person holds a current and valid security guard registration. This bill would make conforming changes to that effect. (5) Existing law requires the licensee to maintain supplies of applications and fingerprint cards that must be provided by the bureau upon request. Existing law requires an employee, on the first day of employment and at the request of the client thereafter, to display to the client their registration card, as specified. This bill would delete those provisions. (6) Existing law requires that an application be verified and include specified information regarding, among other things, the employer's address and license number. This bill would modify the information required on that application by no longer requiring the employer's address and license number, and by requiring the application to include, among other things, the provider of the course in the exercise of the power to arrest. (7) Existing law requires a registration card to expire by a specified date, and establishes a process for a registrant to renew their registration. Existing law authorizes a registrant whose registration has been renewed but who has not yet received a renewed registration card by the time that their prior registration has expired to, for 90 days after the expiration of the card, continue to meet registration requirements by providing evidence of renewal. This bill would instead authorize a registrant to work as a security guard pending receipt of the renewed registration card if the renewed registration card has not been delivered to the registrant before the expiration of the prior registration, but the bureau has renewed the registration. (8) Existing law requires a firearm training facility, before allowing a person to participate in the course of training in the carrying and usage of firearms, to verify and certify that they have seen documentation verifying that the person is a United States citizen or possesses permanent legal alien status in the United States. This bill would require a firearms training facility to also verify and certify that they have seen the documentation specified above before allowing a person to participate in the requalification course in carrying and using a firearm. (9) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of locksmiths by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services and requires an application for a locksmith license to be made in writing and filed with the Chief of the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. This bill would delete the requirement that the application be made in writing. (10) The Alarm Company Act requires the Director of Consumer Affairs to issue a firearms permit to an applicant who is a licensee under the act, a qualified manager of a licensee, a designated branch officer of a licensee, or a registered alarm agent who meets specified requirements. The Private Security Services Act requires the bureau to issue a firearms permit to a licensee, a qualified manager of a licensee, or a registered security guard who meets specified requirements. The Private Investigator Act requires the bureau to issue a firearms permit to an applicant who is a licensee or a qualified manager of a licensee who meets specified requirements. Existing law prohibits the director from renewing a firearms qualification card unless specified requirements are met, including that the applicant has successfully passed a written examination. This bill would require an applicant for a firearms permit under the above-specified provisions to be at least 21 years of age. The bill would, on an ongoing basis, require an applicant for a firearms qualification card to produce evidence to the firearm training facility that the applicant is a citizen of the United States or has permanent legal alien status in the United States. (11) Existing law provides that the powers and duties of the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services under the Alarm Company Act, the Collateral Recovery Act, the Private Security Services Act, the Proprietary Security Services Act, the Private Investigator Act, and under the provisions regulating locksmiths are subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and requires the review to be performed as if the act were scheduled to be repealed as of January 1, 2020. This bill would revise that date to January 1, 2024. (12) Existing law establishes the Private Investigator Fund and directs money derived from the Private Investigator Act to be deposited into that fund and expended for purposes of the act upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would abolish that fund and direct money derived under the act to be deposited into the Private Security Services Fund. The bill would increase the amounts of various fees under the act, including the application and examination fee, the branch office certificate fee, the fee for an original private investigator license, the fee to obtain a certificate of licensure, and the reexamination fee for applicants and qualified managers. The bill would increase the processing fee for the assignment of a license. The bill would establish a fee of $25 for an endorsed verification for licensure, certification, or permit and would limit the reinstatement fee following a suspension to not more than 50% of the renewal fee. The bill would make the provisions revising fees operative on July 1, 2020. (13) This bill would make other conforming and nonsubstantive changes, including deleting obsolete provisions. (14) Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime under the Private Security Services Act, and by expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 609?
SB 609 is sponsored by Glazer.
What is the current status of SB 609?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 609?
Track SB 609 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 609

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 609

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →