SB 915 — Mobilehome parks: emergency relief: coronavirus (COVID-19).
Last action — Ordered to inactive file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs the terms and conditions of residency in mobilehome parks. Under existing law, the management of a mobilehome park may not terminate or refuse to renew a tenancy, except pursuant to certain procedures, and upon giving written notice to the homeowner of not less than 60 days. This law, among other things, defines "management" to mean the owner of a mobilehome park or an agent or representative authorized to act on the owner's behalf in connection with matters relating to a tenancy in the park. Existing law defines a "resident" as a homeowner or other person who lawfully occupies a mobilehome. This bill would prohibit the management of a mobilehome park from terminating or attempting to terminate the tenancy of a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, on the grounds of failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement or failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges during a declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the state of emergency or local emergency is terminated, unless necessary to protect the public health and safety. The bill would also prohibit, during this timeframe, the management of a mobilehome park from issuing certain notices relating to rent increases, termination of tenancy, or refusal to renew tenancy. The bill would also prohibit a court from issuing a summons on a complaint for unlawful detainer within this timeframe for failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement or failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges, unless the court finds the action necessary to protect public health and safety. Existing law prohibits the management of a mobilehome park from terminating a tenancy unless for one of specified reasons, including, but not limited to, failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement, as specified, and failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges for at least 5 days from the due date. Existing law requires, after the 5 days of failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges elapses, the management of the mobilehome park to provide the homeowner with a 3-day notice to pay or vacate the tenancy, as prescribed. Under existing law, an act or omission of the homeowner or resident does not constitute a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement unless and until the management has given the homeowner written notice of the alleged rule or regulation violation and the homeowner or resident has failed to adhere to the rule or regulation within 7 days, except as specified. This bill would require a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, to have 7 days from the date they receive a notice of a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park described above to notify the management in writing of their need to have additional time to comply with the notice. The bill, with exceptions, would require management that receives the described notice to grant the homeowner or resident the additional time requested to comply with the rule or regulation, but in no event more than one year. The bill would require a notice of a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement, as specified, issued during a declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the state of emergency or local emergency is terminated, to contain specified language describing these provisions, printed in at least 12-point boldface type at the top of the notice. This bill would authorize a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, to notify management in writing at any time prior to the expiration of a 3-day notice demanding payment of past due rent, utilities, or reasonable incidental charges that they need additional time to make the payment due to hardship from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The bill would require management that received the above-described notice to grant the homeowner or resident one year from the expiration of the 3-day notice to make the payment, unless a different amount of time is mutually agreed upon by the homeowner or resident and the management. The bill would also require a notice for failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges issued during the declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the termination thereof, to contain specified language describing these provisions, in at least 12-point boldface type at the top of the notice. Existing law authorizes the management of a mobilehome park to file a petition for an order to enjoin a continuing or recurring violation of a reasonable rule or regulation of the mobilehome park within the limited jurisdiction of the superior court of the county in which the mobilehome community is located. If a homeowner or resident who provides written notice to the management of the mobilehome park that the homeowner or resident is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, this bill would prohibit the management from seeking to enforce such an order or imposing rent increases or other charges in addition to what is included in the resident's base rent while the homeowner or resident is in compliance with the terms of a specified payment recovery plan. The bill would authorize a homeowner or resident who is prevented by management from exercising the rights provided here to bring a civil action and would authorize a court to order injunctive relief and other relief the court deems proper, as specified. The bill would require management to itemize on the homeowner's or resident's rental invoice any payments made and due under the repayment plan. The bill would also require management to apply any government funds received to offset rent, utilities, or other charges left unpaid due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic as a credit against the outstanding balances of homeowners and residents impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic equally on a per person basis. The bill would also require a specified payment recovery period to be extended through the end of the 2021 calendar year if the homeowner or resident demonstrates that they have continued to suffer economic hardship due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/24/20 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 24, 2020
- Amended 07/27/20 - Amended Assembly pdf July 27, 2020
- Amended 06/18/20 - Amended Senate pdf June 18, 2020
- Amended 05/29/20 - Amended Senate pdf May 29, 2020
- Amended 05/13/20 - Amended Senate pdf May 13, 2020
- Amended 04/15/20 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2020
- Amended 03/05/20 - Amended Senate pdf March 05, 2020
- Introduced 02/03/20 - Introduced pdf February 03, 2020
- SB915 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 44. Noes 15. Page 5454.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Amendments by Assembly Member Kiley tabled on motion by Assembly Member Calderon. (Ayes 54. Noes 17. Page 5169.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 29).
-
July 28 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 3864.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3767.) (June 18).
-
Set for hearing June 18.
-
June 9 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing June 9.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3583.) (May 22).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing May 22.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.
-
March 31 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing March 31.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.
-
Referred to Com. on HOUSING.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Leyva · Primary
- Dodd · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leyva
Co-sponsors (1)
- Dodd
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 17 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 19% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Kamlager | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 17 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 22% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Diep | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 915 do?
- Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs the terms and conditions of residency in mobilehome parks. Under existing law, the management of a mobilehome park may not terminate or refuse to renew a tenancy, except pursuant to certain procedures, and upon giving written notice to the homeowner of not less than 60 days. This law, among other things, defines "management" to mean the owner of a mobilehome park or an agent or representative authorized to act on the owner's behalf in connection with matters relating to a tenancy in the park. Existing law defines a "resident" as a homeowner or other person who lawfully occupies a mobilehome. This bill would prohibit the management of a mobilehome park from terminating or attempting to terminate the tenancy of a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, on the grounds of failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement or failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges during a declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the state of emergency or local emergency is terminated, unless necessary to protect the public health and safety. The bill would also prohibit, during this timeframe, the management of a mobilehome park from issuing certain notices relating to rent increases, termination of tenancy, or refusal to renew tenancy. The bill would also prohibit a court from issuing a summons on a complaint for unlawful detainer within this timeframe for failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement or failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges, unless the court finds the action necessary to protect public health and safety. Existing law prohibits the management of a mobilehome park from terminating a tenancy unless for one of specified reasons, including, but not limited to, failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement, as specified, and failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges for at least 5 days from the due date. Existing law requires, after the 5 days of failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges elapses, the management of the mobilehome park to provide the homeowner with a 3-day notice to pay or vacate the tenancy, as prescribed. Under existing law, an act or omission of the homeowner or resident does not constitute a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement unless and until the management has given the homeowner written notice of the alleged rule or regulation violation and the homeowner or resident has failed to adhere to the rule or regulation within 7 days, except as specified. This bill would require a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, to have 7 days from the date they receive a notice of a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park described above to notify the management in writing of their need to have additional time to comply with the notice. The bill, with exceptions, would require management that receives the described notice to grant the homeowner or resident the additional time requested to comply with the rule or regulation, but in no event more than one year. The bill would require a notice of a failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park that is part of the rental agreement, as specified, issued during a declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the state of emergency or local emergency is terminated, to contain specified language describing these provisions, printed in at least 12-point boldface type at the top of the notice. This bill would authorize a homeowner or resident who is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, to notify management in writing at any time prior to the expiration of a 3-day notice demanding payment of past due rent, utilities, or reasonable incidental charges that they need additional time to make the payment due to hardship from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The bill would require management that received the above-described notice to grant the homeowner or resident one year from the expiration of the 3-day notice to make the payment, unless a different amount of time is mutually agreed upon by the homeowner or resident and the management. The bill would also require a notice for failure to pay rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges issued during the declared state of emergency or local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and during a 120-day time period after the termination thereof, to contain specified language describing these provisions, in at least 12-point boldface type at the top of the notice. Existing law authorizes the management of a mobilehome park to file a petition for an order to enjoin a continuing or recurring violation of a reasonable rule or regulation of the mobilehome park within the limited jurisdiction of the superior court of the county in which the mobilehome community is located. If a homeowner or resident who provides written notice to the management of the mobilehome park that the homeowner or resident is impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, as specified, this bill would prohibit the management from seeking to enforce such an order or imposing rent increases or other charges in addition to what is included in the resident's base rent while the homeowner or resident is in compliance with the terms of a specified payment recovery plan. The bill would authorize a homeowner or resident who is prevented by management from exercising the rights provided here to bring a civil action and would authorize a court to order injunctive relief and other relief the court deems proper, as specified. The bill would require management to itemize on the homeowner's or resident's rental invoice any payments made and due under the repayment plan. The bill would also require management to apply any government funds received to offset rent, utilities, or other charges left unpaid due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic as a credit against the outstanding balances of homeowners and residents impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic equally on a per person basis. The bill would also require a specified payment recovery period to be extended through the end of the 2021 calendar year if the homeowner or resident demonstrates that they have continued to suffer economic hardship due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
- Who sponsors SB 915?
- SB 915 is sponsored by Leyva and Dodd.
- What is the current status of SB 915?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 915?
- Track SB 915 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 915
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 915
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →