California 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2377 — Residential facilities.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 146, Statutes of 2020.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensing and regulation by the State Department of Social Services of community care facilities. Under existing law, community care facilities include, among others, various types of adult residential facilities. Existing law also provides for the regulation by the department of residential care facilities for persons with chronic life-threatening illness. This bill would require an applicant or licensee of an adult community care facility or a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness to maintain an email address of record with the department and notify the department in writing of the email address and any change to that address, as specified. Existing regulations of the department define an "adult residential facility" as a facility of any capacity that provides 24-hour-a-day nonmedical care and supervision to persons 18 to 59 years of age, inclusive, and, under specified conditions, to persons 60 years of age and older. Existing law requires the licensee of an adult residential facility that has submitted a closure plan to inform the city and county in which the facility is located of the proposed closure, including whether the licensee intends to sell the property or business, no later than 180 days before the proposed closure, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the act is a misdemeanor. Existing law separately licenses and regulates residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFE) , which provide housing and other specified services for persons 60 years of age and older. Among other things, existing law requires an RCFE, prior to transferring a resident to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license or change in use of the facility, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, and minimize possible trauma by taking specified actions relating to resident notification and transfer and relocation planning, as prescribed, including providing written notice to the resident or the resident's responsible person 60 days prior to the eviction. Among other provisions, existing law requires an RCFE, if 7 or more residents of the facility will be transferred as a result of the forfeiture of a license or the change in the use of a facility, to submit a proposed closure plan for the affected residents to the department for review, and requires the department to approve or disapprove the plan. Existing law requires an RCFE to refund to a resident any paid preadmission fees, according to a prescribed schedule. Existing law imposes civil penalties for a violation of these requirements by an RCFE, of $100 per violation per day. Existing law requires the licensee of an RCFE to notify the city and county in which the facility is located, current residents, and other designated parties, in writing, of specified events relating to the facility and the licensee. This bill would establish similar procedures and requirements for the licensee of a licensed adult residential facility when notifying the city and county of a proposed closure or other event, and when transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license or a closure of the facility for another reason. The bill would additionally give the city or county the first opportunity to make an offer to purchase the property and continue the operation of the adult residential facility within 60 days after a licensee who is also the owner has notified the city or county of an intent to sell the property, as specified. The bill would authorize the city or county to either take over operation of the facility under those circumstances, or enter into a long-term lease for its operation with a nonprofit or for-profit entity with a history of providing adult residential facility services, as specified. The bill would require a lease entered into pursuant to the bill to include a requirement that the lessee maintain licensure of the property as an adult residential facility. Because a violation of the bill's requirements by certain residential facilities would be a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 146, Statutes of 2020.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5386.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  11. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 20).

  12. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  16. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 64. Noes 6. Page 4764.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 3).

  21. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  25. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.

  29. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  30. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chiu · Primary
  • Skinner · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Chiu

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Skinner

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 72 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 45006
Democratic 21001
Republican 6000
Total 72007
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Weber — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Gray — Yea
Salas — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Ting — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Brough — Yea
Fong — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Diep — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Chau — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gloria — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Daly — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Smith — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Chu — Not Voting
Obernolte — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Not Voting
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Unaffiliated 27000
Republican 2001
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Galgiani — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Allen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Roth — Yea
Chang — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5100
Republican 0100
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bates — Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Republican 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bates — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 64 Yea · 6 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 22000
Unaffiliated 41406
Republican 1203
Total 64609
% of votes cast 81%8%0%11%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Smith — Yea
Weber — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Diep — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Low — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Ting — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Cunningham — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Brough — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Fong — Not Voting
Quirk — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 8003
Republican 0001
Total 14004
% of votes cast 78%0%0%22%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
McCarty — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Diep — Yea
Fong — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Voepel — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3001
Democratic 3000
Republican 0001
Total 6002
% of votes cast 75%0%0%25%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Mathis — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2377 do?
Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensing and regulation by the State Department of Social Services of community care facilities. Under existing law, community care facilities include, among others, various types of adult residential facilities. Existing law also provides for the regulation by the department of residential care facilities for persons with chronic life-threatening illness. This bill would require an applicant or licensee of an adult community care facility or a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness to maintain an email address of record with the department and notify the department in writing of the email address and any change to that address, as specified. Existing regulations of the department define an "adult residential facility" as a facility of any capacity that provides 24-hour-a-day nonmedical care and supervision to persons 18 to 59 years of age, inclusive, and, under specified conditions, to persons 60 years of age and older. Existing law requires the licensee of an adult residential facility that has submitted a closure plan to inform the city and county in which the facility is located of the proposed closure, including whether the licensee intends to sell the property or business, no later than 180 days before the proposed closure, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the act is a misdemeanor. Existing law separately licenses and regulates residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFE) , which provide housing and other specified services for persons 60 years of age and older. Among other things, existing law requires an RCFE, prior to transferring a resident to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license or change in use of the facility, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, and minimize possible trauma by taking specified actions relating to resident notification and transfer and relocation planning, as prescribed, including providing written notice to the resident or the resident's responsible person 60 days prior to the eviction. Among other provisions, existing law requires an RCFE, if 7 or more residents of the facility will be transferred as a result of the forfeiture of a license or the change in the use of a facility, to submit a proposed closure plan for the affected residents to the department for review, and requires the department to approve or disapprove the plan. Existing law requires an RCFE to refund to a resident any paid preadmission fees, according to a prescribed schedule. Existing law imposes civil penalties for a violation of these requirements by an RCFE, of $100 per violation per day. Existing law requires the licensee of an RCFE to notify the city and county in which the facility is located, current residents, and other designated parties, in writing, of specified events relating to the facility and the licensee. This bill would establish similar procedures and requirements for the licensee of a licensed adult residential facility when notifying the city and county of a proposed closure or other event, and when transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license or a closure of the facility for another reason. The bill would additionally give the city or county the first opportunity to make an offer to purchase the property and continue the operation of the adult residential facility within 60 days after a licensee who is also the owner has notified the city or county of an intent to sell the property, as specified. The bill would authorize the city or county to either take over operation of the facility under those circumstances, or enter into a long-term lease for its operation with a nonprofit or for-profit entity with a history of providing adult residential facility services, as specified. The bill would require a lease entered into pursuant to the bill to include a requirement that the lessee maintain licensure of the property as an adult residential facility. Because a violation of the bill's requirements by certain residential facilities would be a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2377?
AB 2377 is sponsored by Chiu and Skinner.
What is the current status of AB 2377?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2377?
Track AB 2377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2377

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2377

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →