Personal information: contractors: cyber insurance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2320 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2320.
You're tracking AB 2320
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2320 — Personal information: contractors: cyber insurance.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977 (IPA) , requires an agency, as defined, to maintain and disclose personal information in accordance with specified conditions and limitations to ensure the security and confidentiality of the personal information. Existing law regulates contracts for goods and services entered into by state agencies. Specified violations of provisions in a state contract is a crime. This bill would require a contract with a contractor doing business with a state agency to require that the contractor maintain cyber insurance if the contractor receives or has access to records containing personal information protected under the IPA. By expanding the scope of existing crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/14/20 - Introduced Current pdf February 14, 2020
- AB2320 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and A. & A.R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Chau · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Chau
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 45% | 27% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2320 do?
- Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977 (IPA) , requires an agency, as defined, to maintain and disclose personal information in accordance with specified conditions and limitations to ensure the security and confidentiality of the personal information. Existing law regulates contracts for goods and services entered into by state agencies. Specified violations of provisions in a state contract is a crime. This bill would require a contract with a contractor doing business with a state agency to require that the contractor maintain cyber insurance if the contractor receives or has access to records containing personal information protected under the IPA. By expanding the scope of existing crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2320?
- AB 2320 is sponsored by Chau.
- What is the current status of AB 2320?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2320?
- Track AB 2320 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2320
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2320
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →