California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 287 — State Highway Route 710.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways and associated property. Existing law designates and describes state highway routes, and also describes the state highway routes in the California freeway and expressway system, including all of Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles. This bill would encourage the Department of Transportation, in coordination with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, to consult with local governments of cities and areas along the State Route 710 North corridor regarding development of the State Route 710 North project area, as specified, and would require the department to seek alternatives for the development of the State Route 710 North project area from those local governments that improve air quality and public health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve traffic safety, address projected traffic volumes, address projected growth in population, and create jobs. The bill would require the department, if appropriate and feasible, to implement any development alternative agreed upon by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and those local governments, in a manner consistent with applicable law. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature on the progress of the State Route 710 North project on or before January 1, 2020. The bill would also limit the portion of Route 710 included in the California freeway and expressway system to the portion between Route 1 and Route 10.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  6. In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  9. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.

  11. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Holden · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Holden

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Reconsideration.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 13001
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Not Voting
Medina — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Chu — Yea
Harper — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Daly — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Baker — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Failed 3 Yea · 1 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3107
Democratic 0003
Total 31010
% of votes cast 21%7%0%71%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Not Voting
Chu — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Friedman — Yea
Harper — Nay
Bocanegra — Not Voting
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Baker — Not Voting
Frazier — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment labor transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 287 do?
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways and associated property. Existing law designates and describes state highway routes, and also describes the state highway routes in the California freeway and expressway system, including all of Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles. This bill would encourage the Department of Transportation, in coordination with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, to consult with local governments of cities and areas along the State Route 710 North corridor regarding development of the State Route 710 North project area, as specified, and would require the department to seek alternatives for the development of the State Route 710 North project area from those local governments that improve air quality and public health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve traffic safety, address projected traffic volumes, address projected growth in population, and create jobs. The bill would require the department, if appropriate and feasible, to implement any development alternative agreed upon by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and those local governments, in a manner consistent with applicable law. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature on the progress of the State Route 710 North project on or before January 1, 2020. The bill would also limit the portion of Route 710 included in the California freeway and expressway system to the portion between Route 1 and Route 10.
Who sponsors AB 287?
AB 287 is sponsored by Holden.
What is the current status of AB 287?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 287?
Track AB 287 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 287

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 287

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →