Public Utilities Commission: gas corporations: electrical corporations: safety.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 637 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 637.
You're tracking SB 637
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 637 — Public Utilities Commission: gas corporations: electrical corporations: safety.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to investigate the cause of all accidents occurring upon the property of any public utility or directly or indirectly arising from or connected with its maintenance or operation, resulting in loss of life or injury to person or property and requiring, in the judgment of the commission, investigation by it, and authorizes the commission to make any order or recommendation with respect to the investigation that it determines to be just and reasonable. The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. This bill would require the commission to adopt a commissionwide gas corporation and electrical corporation safety program that includes specified elements and would authorize the commission to adopt an organizationwide safety program for other public utilities and specified nonutilities that are also subject to the commission's regulatory jurisdiction. The bill would require gas corporations and electrical corporations to have effective programs to continually identify safety hazards and to analyze, assess, and mitigate or eliminate safety risks. The bill would specify the safety-related responsibilities with respect to gas corporations and electrical corporations of various entities within the commission. The bill would require the commission to perform a detailed safety management assessment for each gas corporation and electrical corporation not less often than every 5 years and would require the commission to take official notice of the safety management assessment in relevant proceedings, including general rate cases. The bill would require the commission, by March 1, 2018, to contract with one or more consultants to determine the effectiveness of its internal safety communications and decisionmaking processes and the incentives for staff in primarily safety-related roles compared to the incentives and opportunities for attorneys, administrative law judges, and staff in primarily nonsafety, energy-policy-related roles. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill placing additional safety duties upon gas corporations and electrical corporations would be a part of the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Existing law requires the commission to appoint an executive director who is responsible for the commission's executive and administrative duties and to organize, coordinate, supervise, and direct the operations and affairs of the commission and expedite all matters within the commission's jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes the executive director to employ those officers, administrative law judges, experts, engineers, statisticians, accountants, inspectors, clerks, and employees as the executive director deems necessary to carry out the provisions of the Public Utilities Act or to perform the duties and exercise the powers conferred upon the commission by law. This bill would require the executive director to provide an engineer to each commissioner to advise him or her on the technical aspects of safety and the technical aspects of other topics within the jurisdiction of the commission. The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to determine whether a proceeding requires a hearing and, if so, to determine whether the matter requires a quasi-legislative, an adjudication, or a ratesetting hearing. For these purposes, quasi-legislative cases are cases that establish policy rulemakings and investigations which may establish rules affecting an entire industry. Existing law generally permits ex parte communications in quasi-legislative cases. The bill would require that any excess of formality in commission policy or administrative practice not be used to prevent commission staff from submitting findings and evidence relevant to safety into the quasi-legislative proceeding record or from presenting arguments to improve safety in quasi-legislative cases. Pursuant to its existing authority, the commission has issued an interim decision adopting a multiattribute approach and directing certain public utilities to take steps toward a more uniform risk management framework. This bill would void a specified order in that interim decision and direct the Safety and Enforcement Division and executive director of the commission to not implement that order. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/27/17 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 27, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- SB637 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
May 25 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
May 8 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 806.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
April 18 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 637 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to investigate the cause of all accidents occurring upon the property of any public utility or directly or indirectly arising from or connected with its maintenance or operation, resulting in loss of life or injury to person or property and requiring, in the judgment of the commission, investigation by it, and authorizes the commission to make any order or recommendation with respect to the investigation that it determines to be just and reasonable. The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. This bill would require the commission to adopt a commissionwide gas corporation and electrical corporation safety program that includes specified elements and would authorize the commission to adopt an organizationwide safety program for other public utilities and specified nonutilities that are also subject to the commission's regulatory jurisdiction. The bill would require gas corporations and electrical corporations to have effective programs to continually identify safety hazards and to analyze, assess, and mitigate or eliminate safety risks. The bill would specify the safety-related responsibilities with respect to gas corporations and electrical corporations of various entities within the commission. The bill would require the commission to perform a detailed safety management assessment for each gas corporation and electrical corporation not less often than every 5 years and would require the commission to take official notice of the safety management assessment in relevant proceedings, including general rate cases. The bill would require the commission, by March 1, 2018, to contract with one or more consultants to determine the effectiveness of its internal safety communications and decisionmaking processes and the incentives for staff in primarily safety-related roles compared to the incentives and opportunities for attorneys, administrative law judges, and staff in primarily nonsafety, energy-policy-related roles. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill placing additional safety duties upon gas corporations and electrical corporations would be a part of the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Existing law requires the commission to appoint an executive director who is responsible for the commission's executive and administrative duties and to organize, coordinate, supervise, and direct the operations and affairs of the commission and expedite all matters within the commission's jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes the executive director to employ those officers, administrative law judges, experts, engineers, statisticians, accountants, inspectors, clerks, and employees as the executive director deems necessary to carry out the provisions of the Public Utilities Act or to perform the duties and exercise the powers conferred upon the commission by law. This bill would require the executive director to provide an engineer to each commissioner to advise him or her on the technical aspects of safety and the technical aspects of other topics within the jurisdiction of the commission. The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to determine whether a proceeding requires a hearing and, if so, to determine whether the matter requires a quasi-legislative, an adjudication, or a ratesetting hearing. For these purposes, quasi-legislative cases are cases that establish policy rulemakings and investigations which may establish rules affecting an entire industry. Existing law generally permits ex parte communications in quasi-legislative cases. The bill would require that any excess of formality in commission policy or administrative practice not be used to prevent commission staff from submitting findings and evidence relevant to safety into the quasi-legislative proceeding record or from presenting arguments to improve safety in quasi-legislative cases. Pursuant to its existing authority, the commission has issued an interim decision adopting a multiattribute approach and directing certain public utilities to take steps toward a more uniform risk management framework. This bill would void a specified order in that interim decision and direct the Safety and Enforcement Division and executive director of the commission to not implement that order. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 637?
- SB 637 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of SB 637?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 637?
- Track SB 637 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 637
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 637
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →