Tenancy: eviction: for cause.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2925 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2925.
You're tracking AB 2925
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2925 — Tenancy: eviction: for cause.
Last action — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 16. Noes 36. Page 5655.).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law governs the hiring of residential dwelling units and establishes provisions for the renewal or termination of a hiring of residential real property for an unspecified term. Existing law requires that an owner of a residential dwelling generally give at least 60 days' notice prior to termination or, in the case of a tenant or resident that has resided in the dwelling for less than one year or if certain other conditions apply, 30 days' notice prior to termination. Existing law provides that a tenant of real property is guilty of unlawful detainer in certain circumstances, including that the tenant continues in possession of the property after the expiration of the term for which it is let to him or her, as provided. This bill would prohibit a landlord from terminating a tenancy, or seeking to recover possession from a tenant who continues in possession of property after the expiration of the term for which it is let, as described above, except for cause, as set forth with particularity in the notice. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature to encourage or incentivize cities to enact just cause eviction ordinances in order to prevent unnecessary displacement of tenants. The bill would state that its provisions are in addition to, and do not supersede or preempt, any other state or local law regulating the grounds for eviction or the termination of a tenancy.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/29/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 29, 2018
- Amended 05/07/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 07, 2018
- Amended 04/24/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 24, 2018
- Amended 03/22/18 - Amended Assembly pdf March 22, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB2925 View text html
Action History
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 16. Noes 36. Page 5655.).
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5435.)
-
Assembly Rule 69(b) suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 5434.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (May 1).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Co-sponsors (3)
- Bloom
- Chiu
- Skinner
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 28 | 0 | 16 |
| Democratic | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 36 | 0 | 26 |
| % of votes cast | 21% | 46% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Gloria | — | Not Voting |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Not Voting |
| Wood | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2925 do?
- Existing law governs the hiring of residential dwelling units and establishes provisions for the renewal or termination of a hiring of residential real property for an unspecified term. Existing law requires that an owner of a residential dwelling generally give at least 60 days' notice prior to termination or, in the case of a tenant or resident that has resided in the dwelling for less than one year or if certain other conditions apply, 30 days' notice prior to termination. Existing law provides that a tenant of real property is guilty of unlawful detainer in certain circumstances, including that the tenant continues in possession of the property after the expiration of the term for which it is let to him or her, as provided. This bill would prohibit a landlord from terminating a tenancy, or seeking to recover possession from a tenant who continues in possession of property after the expiration of the term for which it is let, as described above, except for cause, as set forth with particularity in the notice. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature to encourage or incentivize cities to enact just cause eviction ordinances in order to prevent unnecessary displacement of tenants. The bill would state that its provisions are in addition to, and do not supersede or preempt, any other state or local law regulating the grounds for eviction or the termination of a tenancy.
- Who sponsors AB 2925?
- AB 2925 is sponsored by Bloom, Chiu, Skinner, and Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2925?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2925?
- Track AB 2925 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2925
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2925
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →