AB 488 — Mental Health Services Act.

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 488 do?

Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) , an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the continuously appropriated Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to, among other things, implement specified mental health services through contracts with county mental health programs or counties acting jointly. Existing law requires the department to conduct program reviews of performance contracts to determine compliance, as specified. If a county mental health program is not in compliance with its performance contract, existing law authorizes the department to request a plan of correction with a specific timeline to achieve improvements. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission to oversee various parts of the act, as specified. Existing law authorizes the commission to, among other things, obtain data and information from specified entities to utilize in its oversight, review, training and technical assistance, accountability, and evaluation capacity regarding projects and programs supported with MHSA funds. Existing law requires each county mental health program to prepare and submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan, and annual updates, as specified, to the commission and the department within 30 days after adoption. Existing law authorizes the commission, if it identifies a critical issue related to the performance of a county mental health program, to refer the issue to the State Department of Health Care Services. Existing law authorizes the department to withhold mental health funding, upon a determination of noncompliance by the county, as specified, or if a county does not submit a specified annual revenue and expenditure report by the required deadline. Existing law requires that funds be reserved for administrative costs, not to exceed 5% of the total of annual revenues received for the Mental Health Services Fund, for the department and the commission, among other specified entities, to implement duties pursuant to programs under the act, as specified. Existing law requires that those funds be subject to appropriation in the annual Budget Act. This bill would establish the Mental Health Services Fund Transparency and Accountability Office within the California Health and Human Services Agency, as specified. The bill would transfer various functions of the State Department of Health Care Services under the act to the office. Under this bill, the office would succeed to, and be vested with, all the duties, powers, responsibilities, and jurisdiction, vested in the department, regarding oversight of the Mental Health Services Fund, as specified. The bill would also require the office to assume certain duties, including, among others, initiating investigations, advising counties, conducting research, and reporting to the Legislature, by December 31, 2019, of any additional authority it deems necessary to complete its duties and to ensure county compliance with the act, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes to other provisions to reflect the transfer of those mental health responsibilities. Existing law authorizes the act to be amended by a 23 vote of the Legislature if the amendments are consistent with, and further the intent of, the act. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to add provisions to clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations relating to mental health services in California and stating that the provisions of this bill are consistent with, and further the intent of, the act. By amending the provisions of the act, this bill would require a 23 vote of the Legislature.

Who sponsors AB 488?

AB 488 is sponsored by Gallagher, James (Republican), Kiley, Lackey, Tom (Republican), and Steinorth.

What is the current status of AB 488?

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Where can I track AB 488?

Track AB 488 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.