California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

AB 1967 — Zero net energy project budget requests.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The California Constitution requires the Governor to submit a budget for the ensuing fiscal year to the Legislature within the first 10 days of each regular session. Existing law requires that budget to contain a complete plan and itemized statement of all proposed expenditures of the state provided by existing law or recommended by the Governor, and of all estimated revenues, as specified. Existing law requires the budget to be prepared in a specified manner. Existing law requires every state agency and court, for which an appropriation has been made, to submit to the Department of Finance for approval a complete and detailed budget, as specified, at the time and in the form as may be prescribed by the department, setting forth all proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. Existing law requires the department to submit to the committee in each house of the Legislature that considers appropriations and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee copies of the specified budget material submitted to the department by state agencies. Existing Executive Order B-18-12 directs state agencies to take various steps to achieve certain environmental and climate change goals, including to increase the number of state-owned buildings that are zero net energy. This bill would require each state entity, as defined, that makes a budget request for the construction or retrofit of a state-owned building, or campus of buildings, to make that building or campus zero net energy, including a project to meet the state's goals for zero net energy buildings in Executive Order B-18-12, to include a cost–benefit analysis that includes certain information with the request when presenting its budget to the department. The bill would require the department to submit copies of the cost–benefit analysis to the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, the Assembly Committee on Budget, and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee with each zero net energy budget request.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.

  4. Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and NAT. RES.

  5. From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.

  6. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1967 do?
The California Constitution requires the Governor to submit a budget for the ensuing fiscal year to the Legislature within the first 10 days of each regular session. Existing law requires that budget to contain a complete plan and itemized statement of all proposed expenditures of the state provided by existing law or recommended by the Governor, and of all estimated revenues, as specified. Existing law requires the budget to be prepared in a specified manner. Existing law requires every state agency and court, for which an appropriation has been made, to submit to the Department of Finance for approval a complete and detailed budget, as specified, at the time and in the form as may be prescribed by the department, setting forth all proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. Existing law requires the department to submit to the committee in each house of the Legislature that considers appropriations and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee copies of the specified budget material submitted to the department by state agencies. Existing Executive Order B-18-12 directs state agencies to take various steps to achieve certain environmental and climate change goals, including to increase the number of state-owned buildings that are zero net energy. This bill would require each state entity, as defined, that makes a budget request for the construction or retrofit of a state-owned building, or campus of buildings, to make that building or campus zero net energy, including a project to meet the state's goals for zero net energy buildings in Executive Order B-18-12, to include a cost–benefit analysis that includes certain information with the request when presenting its budget to the department. The bill would require the department to submit copies of the cost–benefit analysis to the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, the Assembly Committee on Budget, and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee with each zero net energy budget request.
Who sponsors AB 1967?
AB 1967 is sponsored by Patterson, Joe (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 1967?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1967?
Track AB 1967 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1967

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1967

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →