School safety: school facilities and emergency practices: security assessment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1983 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1983.
You're tracking AB 1983
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1983 — School safety: school facilities and emergency practices: security assessment.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of a comprehensive school safety plan for each of its schools, as provided. Existing law requires the schoolsite council of a school, except as provided for a small school district, to write and develop the comprehensive school safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of that particular school. Existing law requires the schoolsite council to consult with a representative from a law enforcement agency in the writing and development of the comprehensive school safety plan. This bill would require the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school, before the commencement of the 2019–20 school year, to contract with a local law enforcement agency to provide a full security assessment of the facilities and emergency practices of each school within its jurisdiction. By imposing additional requirements on governing boards of school districts, county boards of education, and governing bodies of charter schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school to elect not to disclose the contents of the full security assessment. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/01/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 01, 2018
- Amended 03/15/18 - Amended Assembly pdf March 15, 2018
- Introduced 01/31/18 - Introduced pdf January 31, 2018
- AB1983 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 25).
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Waldron · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Waldron
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 0% | 0% | 45% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1983 do?
- Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of a comprehensive school safety plan for each of its schools, as provided. Existing law requires the schoolsite council of a school, except as provided for a small school district, to write and develop the comprehensive school safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of that particular school. Existing law requires the schoolsite council to consult with a representative from a law enforcement agency in the writing and development of the comprehensive school safety plan. This bill would require the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school, before the commencement of the 2019–20 school year, to contract with a local law enforcement agency to provide a full security assessment of the facilities and emergency practices of each school within its jurisdiction. By imposing additional requirements on governing boards of school districts, county boards of education, and governing bodies of charter schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school to elect not to disclose the contents of the full security assessment. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 1983?
- AB 1983 is sponsored by Waldron.
- What is the current status of AB 1983?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1983?
- Track AB 1983 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1983
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1983
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →